All right, so welcome on the it must be the 31st of July for many of you and the 1st of August for
some of us. Great to have you. What does it feel like, Josh? It's a whole new month. Yeah,
yeah thank you guys. I see some very familiar names. Sasha, Josh, thank you guys for showing
up. Wayne, thank you so much for showing up. You guys give me the fuel to to carry on, to fight
the good fight. I appreciate it. Indeed, that's very good Albert and we give fuel to each other.
This is your twice a week injection of fuel, of vitamins for the mind and the soul. So well done
for being here. Thank you. All right, Albert, get into it. Okay, okay. So we'll have Q&A at the end
and when Albert gets close then go to the reactions and we'll handle Q&A in the normal way
in order. So Albert, over to you. Okay, thank you so much. So the first half of this conversation
is going to be with respects to FOIA philosophy and strategies and I was just discussing earlier
and what an impeccable timing Del Bigtree and Aaron Seary have regarding this last FOIA on Thursday.
But I might get into that a little bit later but this first FOIA of this, this bears, this child,
this two-year-old Alaskan child who died supposedly six hours after the vaccination bleeding from
the ears, nose, and mouth and died within six hours of the vaccination per that report. And that
report was only available for the first few minutes in the downloadable files. And what happened was
they must have, and this was during Thanksgiving of last year, 2021, on the first day back from
vacation, so they must have had their holiday crew in there screwing things up for them. They released
all these reports ahead of time, actually released like 15,000 reports. Short story was that this one
particular report was never published. Me and my, I call him my Yoda, Wayne of BearsAnalysis.com.
We worked together, he helped me, he's very professional. He said, hey, don't shout,
don't make a video about it. Let's wait till next week and see if they, see how many of these 15,000
reports they publish again. So sure enough, they published exactly all of them minus the
one child, two-year-old Alaskan baby. So Aaron Seary, we got that information to Aaron Seary.
He saw the value of that. He filed a FOIA and got the response back saying no records. Well,
lo and behold, unbeknownst to me, Mr. Surya, who I'm going to introduce here from France,
as it turns out, has done a bunch of FOIAs and did a FOIA on this particular one where he actually
got a positive response. And it was actually an email thread from John Su and whatever his last
name is, Shimaburuku, saying that, you know, acknowledging that this VAERS ID number existed
and whether it was, that they believed it was fake and they were going to get their subordinates to
vet it. But that's not the point, whether it was fake or not, because the point was that
it was never published yet it already had a VAERS ID number. So that just points to shed some light
onto the other 25,000 VAERS ID numbers that have never been published. You know, the VAERS ID
numbers are very easy to follow because they're sequential by increments of one, but co-mingled
altogether with all the various VAX types. Anyways, takes a little work, but I follow
that like an eagle. And so I know that there's 25,000 unpublished reports. But with that,
there was strategy involved. Surya reached out to me like out of the blue and he told me about this.
Well, we turned around and of course we got this to Aaron Ceres firm to say, hey, you know,
hopefully this will help. But anyways, I'm going, this is Mr. Surya from France. We're going to begin
to talk about how he was successful, where in this case, Aaron Sury wasn't this time.
And he had, and I was listening to Surya's philosophy and ideology and his email,
he's cobbled together like the internal emails of like everybody at the CDC based on previous
FOIAs that he's done. And he uses that and he's very specific, like show me the email communications
between this email and that email. So I don't want to get ahead of myself, but Mr. Surya,
if you can enlighten us, please. Sure. I hope everybody can hear me.
Yes. Okay, great. So I will introduce myself briefly. My name is Surya Arbi. I'm a French guy
who tries to, I try to harass your American federal agencies with FOIA. And sometimes I can get
successful. So can I just share my screen in order to make everybody to be able to see my slide?
Yes. Hang on. Hi, everyone.
Okay. You're on Surya. Sure. That's great.
It's done. It should appear in a few seconds. Just let me know when it's okay. Yes. All good.
Okay. I have 21 slides. I will try to go faster. So all the presentation, it's 10 PM here and I have
to go to bed because I'm completely tired and I have to wake up early tomorrow. So let's start.
I will discuss only the methodology I've used and not the results because the results,
a lot of FOIA just lead to nowhere, but sometimes you can get successful. I've been denied,
I filed a lot of requests which have been denied in the end, but I could find a trick in order to
get in their internal systems and I will explain how I did it. Just to for the introduction,
I'm not only doing FOIAs in targeting US agencies. I'm doing FOIAs nearly everywhere in Europe,
in France at the European Medicine Agency. I'm targeting the English regulator. I have
good results with the TGA, the drug agency based in Australia.
So let's start. Quickly, you probably all know about the surveillance systems which are used
to monitor vaccine safety on a global scale. The passive monitoring is based on VIAs,
Vaccine Averse Event Supporting System in the US, EUDRA Vigilance in Europe. It's globally the same.
It's passive monitoring with underreporting and some of the data has poor quality inside the
systems. On the other side, you have active surveillance based on larger linked databases
or administrative claims or based on electronic health records. In the US, it's mostly based on
the vaccine safety data link managed by the CDC and several HMOs. Under the authority of the FDA,
there are two other systems, BEST, Biologics Effectiveness and Safety, and there is another
system named PRISM, Post-License Rapid Immunization Safety Monitoring. So let's talk a little bit about
what Albert introduced just before. You all know that the VIAs database is publicly available,
but sometimes they manipulate the data and they delete some stuff. So as Albert explained just a
few minutes before, it could identify a specific VIAs ID, the team led by Aaron Searifide for your
request and the CDC ended up with a no record found. I know this sentence by heart because I guess
the CDC guys just make copy paste of this sentence. No, the CDC could not locate any responsive record
to your request. So I decided to use another strategy as in the PDF file showing this report,
we add the ID appearing. So I grabbed the ID and I filed a FOIA request and I explicitly stated
that I wanted to retrieve any email containing this specific string of character
in any part of the email, either or body. And I could grab some responsive records because we
had a PDF file in some attachments of an internal discussion inside the CDC between Tom Shimabukuro,
the head of the COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Task Force, John Su, the guy who is responsible for the VIAs,
and Kevin Malone who is, I don't even know his exact position, but he is on the judicial side.
So sometimes when you try to look for very specific things, just try to look for specific
keywords or specific string of characters embedded in the email and the file of your request
explicitly stating that you want to query the body or the header of the mail. And it will work
great, not only for VIAs IDs, also for other stuff I will show later. So Albert gave me a bunch of
other VIAs IDs which are missing and I have currently another FOIA request which is still
in process to see if they are discussing of those several VIAs IDs in their internal discussions.
But I'm not sure because you know all the VIAs management is outsourced. There is an external
contractor and I'm not sure I will be able to grab a lot of interesting things in their emails.
A few words about what's going on in the EU. We have something close to the VSD but much larger.
An NGO has been created, it's named VAC4EU. There is a huge project named Access. It's a consolidated
database with more than 130 million people. It's some kind of a very very big VSD. In Europe we have
something called the ENCEPP, European Network for Centres of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance.
It's fully under the control of the European medicine agencies. They've posted some protocols
so I know what they are supposed to do. And they have a website, there is a searching tool
and you will be able to see many many many many studies which are registered in this registry.
And what is fun, I just put in my slide some kind of extract. I will be able to share the
PDF if you want it. And what is a little bit strange is that I could see that there are some
American studies which I suppose are required by the FDA. The FDA has probably required those study
to be done by the manufacturers. You can see on the bottom,
on this slide, the next one. Yeah on the top the first one, post-marketing safety of SARS-CoV-2,
mRNA vaccine in the US, active surveillance, SCRI. So this has been required by the FDA. It's probably
done only in the US but I don't know what it has been registered in the European registry.
But I'm pretty sure that the FDA knows about the existence of this study.
There is another one on the bottom, post-emergency use active safety surveillance study among
individuals in the Veterans Affairs Health System receiving TRIZO-BioNTech. So I'm pretty sure that
the FDA is supposed to retrieve all the preliminary reports and the reports related to the study. And
there is the same with COVID-19 vaccine in the US health care workers. I don't know if anyone
has ever heard about this stuff but at least it's supposed to exist. It has been registered in a
European registry. I don't know why. Maybe it's part of the submission because in Europe,
in the US, you have the EU emergency use authorization. In Europe, it's not called EUA,
it's called conditional marketing authorization. But on a global scale, it's the same. And as the
clinical trials are not finished, the manufacturers are supposed to put in their submission projects
of future studies, observational studies to be completed to assess vaccine safety and vaccine
effectiveness. In the US, I love this slide. I love this picture. I grabbed this from a presentation
given by Tom Shimabukuro last year or maybe in 2020. It has been shown at a meeting
organized by the ACIP and it's a global overview of all the surveillance systems they have.
So you already know about the vaccine safety data link. There is a database on Medicare
for veteran administration. I don't think the FDA has a direct link with the DMED but there are also
many other systems and the FDA is supposed to have full visibility on that.
So I tried to file FOIA requests for that. Most of them ended up to be denied. I faced the usual
exemptions B3, B4, B5, you know, and they raised a confidentiality agreement between the CDC and
several HMOs. Maybe you've heard about the very first study which has been published on the vaccine
safety. In the US, the immunization campaign began with the elderly and the genesis health care system.
I filed a FOIA request to retrieve all emails between the investigators located at the Brown
University and the NIH and I also filed another unrelated FOIA request to the CDC and I could see
through this unrelated FOIA request that there were some discussions between Tom Shimabukuro
because the CDC co-founded with the NIH this study and I could see that there were some
discussions between some Tom Shimabukuro, all the investigators based at the Brown University and
an employee of the NIH. So I filed a FOIA request at the NIH to retrieve all emails between
this employee, Tom Shimabukuro and all the investigators as far as I know of. It's still
in process but it's very long. I guess someone in the hierarchy is probably blocking the release
of the documents. Okay about all the surveillance systems, there are many. To me the most interesting
is the VSD because there is a specific project, VSD project 1342. It's called RCA, Rapid Cycle Analysis
they are supposed to perform statistical analysis of a pre-specified set of adverse
event of specific contrast every week and sometimes they kept some safety signals
in their own slides shown at the ACIP. They say that it's not statistically significant.
Actually when you do the math it's highly statistically significant. We could see at
the beginning of March in 2021 that there was a huge problem with strokes and pulmonary embolism
and even VTE, venous thromboembolism. There is another project done on the VSD. It's some kind
of self-control studies but they will test all possible time windows at risk. I could retrieve
all the protocols. There is something that has gone completely unnoticed even Brian Hooker and
Mary Oland from CHD missed that but the FDA released a press release on the 12th July 2021
in which they state that they had an observed number of events which is greater than the expected
ones for four adverse events of specific interest especially with the Pfizer vaccine
in those who are older than 65 years old in the Medicare database. So they do not provide any
numerical results. They just say that they have the signal. They wrote specific protocols
so they've designed some self-controlled studies. The methodology is named SCCS,
self-controlled case series and the four adverse events of specific interest are acute myocardial
infarction, pulmonary embolism, autoimmune thrombocytopenia and DIC disseminated intravascular
coagulation. So they wrote the protocol. I'm sure the study has been done. For the moment they've
not been published in the literature while the FDA on the other side published the one on the
myocarditis and pericardialitis. So I'm pretty sure, 99% sure, that they found the problem and
they probably won't be published as this study in the literature because in this study
they are supposed to test two time windows at risk, one at 28 days post vaccination and the
other one at 56 days post vaccinations. So there are other systems, BEST and PRISM. I talked about
those a few minutes ago quickly. There are a lot of problems with the DOD and the DMED database.
I filed many, many, many FOIA requests as a defense, health agency and so on, Medicare, HHS and
and a lot of American agencies. The best results I could get the agencies which are the most
responsive to me are the CDC and the NIH. I filed tens of FOIA requests to the FDA and it led to
nowhere unfortunately. So the CDC posted a lot of protocols on their own websites so I decided to
make a table because on the protocols sometimes there are project numbers and as you can see there
are some project numbers which are missing. Some missing numbers are 1344, 1347 and 1349.
So when you want to file a FOIA request to the CDC and you want to be successful, for example if
you file a FOIA request requesting for example the full list of the projects they've done on the
vaccine safety data link. If you just file a FOIA request like that they will just reply with a
link to their website with the list of publication and that's it. Obviously I don't care about their
website. I want to know the full list of the projects they've done but I mean the internal
list. So the right methodology to query the system is to identify a record you don't have
but you know that it does exist. For example in my FOIA request I've requested the
title descriptions and protocols of VSD projects 1344, 1447 and 1449. This is my point of entry
and then in the same FOIA request there is another request embedded in it. I've requested
in the same FOIA request the full list of the project done on the vaccine safety data link
since the inception of the database and they replied. They acknowledged to give me the full
list of the VSD projects they've done since the beginning of the 90s and they gave me an excel
sheet with more than 300 lines and I have the status of each project if it has been completed,
ongoing, inactive and so on. As you can imagine many amongst those projects have never been
published and sometimes just by reading the description you see that they identified some
huge issue mostly with leukemia, post immunization leukemias for example.
So targeting the agencies is a good thing but don't forget all industry funded studies because
those reports are being sent to the agencies and sometimes you can grab some interesting
information. I know that industry funded studies have a weak credibility but sometimes you can grab
some interesting things. Some other things which I've noticed
it's about the clinical trial started by the NIH on allergic reactions and I'm not sure if anyone
could hear about that but there is a press release on the NIH website talking about that.
They are studying menstrual issues, you know it's huge, a lot of women are being armed by that.
I just asked by email to the press department of the NIH the grant numbers and the names of
the investigators and they gave me everything. Sometimes it's just dropping an email to the
right department. A lot of things which can be interesting to retrieve also are all the
regulatory documents when the product is under development you have the DSER,
development safety updates report when it's gone into post marketing it's called PSER,
periodic safety updates report. I know that in Europe I'm not sure if it's the case in the US
but when the PSER pharmacophagence report is submitted by a manufacturer to the agency
then at least in Europe the agency designates a rapporteur and is supposed to write a report
on the PSER. I could grab some investigator brochures I gave that to Peter Doshi,
CSR and experts reports related to that. What I like to request is all the minutes and meeting
notes of pharmacovigilance technical committees. I could grab in Australia I could retrieve
an expert panel review, it's a full report of a pharmacovigilance investigation done on Gardasil
and so on. I will provide some details about how I file my FOIA request and the methodology I use.
The first question you have to ask is what do you want to investigate? Do you want to investigate
people or do you want to investigate a scientific study? If you want to investigate a scientific
study usually the first FOIA request I file is about asking the protocol. When I have the
protocol I have all the deadlines and I have the list of all the documents and reports which
are planned to be submitted. Then when I have the protocol I just read it and if there are some
reports planned I just request. Usually I request all preliminary reports, all reports, all
correspondencies, all emails, all numerical statistical tables and usually the job is done.
If you want to investigate people, if you don't know what's going on, just ask for emails.
Sometimes asking for emails is not enough so you have to ask for correspondencies on a global scale
including emails. Now at the CDC they've been busted 20 years ago by Mary Holland and Lynn Redwood.
I'm not sure if everybody knows that but Mary could grab hundreds of pages of
emails of the CDC guys Thomas Verstraten and Frank DiStefano and now as they have been
busted twice with that they tend to avoid writing too much and their mailbox is nearly empty.
You won't find anything hot in their mailboxes so my next step is to ask for, I will find
FOIA requests just to see if those records exist but a chat log of the internal collaboration
tools. I know that for the VSD all the results are discussed through Zoom meetings which occurred,
they are supposed to occur every week so I will file a FOIA request just to ask for the recordings
and transcripts. Maybe, okay my request will be denied but if my requests are denied I will
know that those records do exist. If they just reply no record found okay it's just that
those documents and those recordings are not are not backed up. So for my FOIA request I've tried
two strategies broad requests and narrow requests. If you file a FOIA request which is too large
usually the CDC or the agency will get back to you and they say oh your request is
too broad you have to narrow it. For example I've been in touch with Elisabeth Bram from
from our own series office and I've asked her if she already filed a FOIA request to look into the
internal emails of the CDC for her own name just to see if internally they discuss about all those
FOIA litigations about our own series and so on. So she asked me to file a FOIA request for that,
I did it and the CDC get back to me and they said hey there are too many emails please narrow
your request. I said okay okay okay let's start my search in 2019. Then the CDC got back to me again
and they said hey there are too many emails please narrow your request again. So I still narrowed my
request and I'm still waiting for the results is still in process, is still stuck in the in-process
status. So for the broad requests usually you can file a FOIA request and request
for all records, all reports, all records related to blah blah blah blah. If you want to
to file some FOIA requests which are very specific for example for emails the best strategy I found
I followed Brian Hooker's advice about that. Specify your time frame for example for the time period
from the 1st January 2020 to the 31st December 2020. For those specific mailboxes please provide
all emails containing this list of keywords and it worked for the missing VARs ID we've shown
a few minutes ago. If you target an individual or list of individuals the best you can do is to
request some specific emails related to specific mailboxes.
So if you're blind and you don't know what's going on try to query emails and keywords,
look for keywords into those emails. If you're completely blind I tried something which was
extremely successful. I've identified some specific individual of specific interest for me as a CDC
and I said I filed a FOIA request requesting all headers for all emails sent and received by those
individuals for a specific week. Actually it was in February or March of 2021
and I was successful. The CDC gave me an excel sheet with more than 700 lines which is huge.
Some of them were redacted but this is through this excel sheet that I could see that
related to the studies done on the elderly funded by the NIH. I could see a line where I saw that
the investigators based at the Brown University were talking with Tom Shimabukuro and I could
grab the full list of recipients. There is a specific trick. Elizabeth Bram told me that the
agency can refuse to release some documents if they are considered to be drafted. So it seems that
when a scientific study is published the underlying data cannot be considered to be drafted anymore
and in the file I could retrieve about the full list of the project done on the vaccine safety
data link they gave me the status. So when a project is labeled as completed it's not a draft
anymore. So to me it's doable to file FOIA requests maybe doing a filing appeal after that
and going to the litigation. Maybe the agency will lose in the end.
So usually as I explained before if you want to retrieve some broad information and you
don't want to be kicked out by the FOIA guys the best strategy I've used is to query
a document or an information you are sure that it does exist and then in the same FOIA request
embed another request related to something bigger. This is exactly the strategy I
followed to retrieve the full list of the project done on the VSD. I've identified
very specific numbers. I knew that those projects do exist and in the same request
I have requested everything else in the database and I was successful.
So I could have some successes. Yes even if 90% of my FOIA requests lead to nowhere sometimes
I could get some successes. Mostly in Australia I filed many FOIA requests. For one of them I
could grab all the vaccination reporting cards used in the clinical trials. To me the most
interesting thing is another FOIA request I filed before I requested all pharmacovigilance reports
and investigation done by the TGA which is the Australian Drug Agency and among all the documents
they provided to me they gave me this expert report of their pharmacovigilance investigations.
It's a huge document it's more than 100 pages long.
And I'm done. I just discussed the methodology I've used. Feel free to ask any question. I've
not discussed too much the results because actually the results I could get sometimes
I could get successful. Most of my FOIA requests have led to nowhere but it's not the most
important. The most important is how you can file FOIA requests correctly
in order to avoid the horrible sentences they copy paste every day. We could not locate any
responsive record to your request. I've read this sentence so many times I'm fed up with that.
But right now I found some tricks to try to enter the system and I'm quite proud about the
results I could get. That's it. So I'm over now and if you have any question feel free to ask.
Surya can you stop share? Sure sure sure. Done. So Albert do you want because Surya has to go to bed
do you want people to ask Surya questions before you continue? Absolutely absolutely ask Surya
all the questions. Josh over to you.
I actually Stephen do you have any questions or should we go to Josh?
Okay Josh you go. Thank you Surya this is you. Hi sorry Josh just two seconds could I ask Surya
whether in France they have equivalents to FOIA in you know and getting this information from
the CDC and in Australia as a matter of interest Surya do you have that possibility in France or
not? Yes we have an equivalent of FOIA but it sucks. You have an equivalent? Yes yes we have an
equivalent of FOIA but it's extremely difficult and in most cases they never reply and it takes
more than one year to retrieve some documents and it's extremely boring and annoying.
I don't want to file in France because I've tried for many years and to me
the equivalent of the French FOIA it's a waste of time. How do you find it in the UK
just as a matter of interest? Oh I filed some FOIA requests to the MHRA the drug agency.
I had good results at the beginning but I guess now they are completely overloaded
because I filed some FOIA requests at the end of the last year maybe November or December and
they never replied. Maybe I should try to file again. Yes so which countries so you've got the
US and Australia you mentioned are those the only two countries worth doing these FOIA requests?
Those are the two countries where I got the best results in terms of responsiveness of the agencies.
Have you tried New Zealand? Yes I tried to file a FOIA request at the University of Auckland I guess
but they replied but it was a load of bullshit. Yeah I was just wondering whether
in New Zealand you might find some whistleblowers? Okay. So do you ever get the
feeling that the people you're communicating with at these agencies are actually whistleblowers
behind the words which they say to you?
Do you understand me? Yes but I'm not sure I would be able to provide a response.
You can't prove it but do you ever get the feeling that the people you're communicating with are
telling you more than they need to? To be honest you can't be sure sometimes they forget to redact
some stuff but you can't be sure if this is a mistake or if they just want to drop some
information. Maybe not to be honest I don't know. Yeah but so it's impossible to know.
So because of the huge bureaucracy in the NIH and the CDC you think that America is the best
place to go fishing or Australia? To me the most interesting information is based in the US.
Right that's interesting isn't it? Yeah because all the civilian systems are out there.
I'm 100% sure that they see everything related to the
virus. Everybody knows that those COVID-19 shots are pure crap. There are vaccine injuries
everywhere and I know that the CDC sees everything. How do I know that? Because in
their own publication sometimes they keep some safety signals. They don't talk about that.
But sometimes just by looking at the figures provided in the article for example there is
a recent publication about the risk of Guillain-Barriss-Andreau and they acknowledge the risk with
the Johnson & Johnson vaccine and they say that there is no issue with the mRNA vaccines but they
use a 21 days time window at risk. I know because it's written in their own protocol that they use
another time window at risk of 42 days and you just have to look at the figures
published in the article that there is a huge problem with the mRNA vaccines and GBS into the
42 days time window at risk. So if I see it they do. Yeah so just as a matter of interest
I don't understand it in America because so Professor Philippe Sanz who's a professor
of law at University College London, he wrote a book called A Torture Team and it was about the
lawyers who were responsible for the change in the law in the US regarding torture and he said
I think in a video I saw, no maybe not somewhere else, but he was astonished how many, so when he
was writing his book they knew he was writing a book about torture and all the people who were
most responsible for what had happened were very happy to be interviewed by him and he was
astonished by their openness. So I don't understand how on the one hand all kinds of
terrible things are going on in the US but decent people even when they're in the firing line are
prepared to give evidence to people like Professor Philippe Sanz. He duly wrote a book by the way which
I highly recommend called Torture Team. Okay I didn't know that. I'm sure that at the CDC to me
everything or at least some things are explained just by corruption and by the most incredible
thing to me it's when I've learned that Frank Di Stefano's son he has autism. The guy has cheated
and manipulated data on all the stuff related to vaccine safety and especially autism and his own
son has autism. It's just incredible. I didn't know that Brian O'Cut wrote me this information
into an email and I don't understand why, to be honest I don't understand why they are doing that.
I guess most if not all people in the call here know about the story of William Thompson and the
MMR autism paper published in pediatrics in 2004. Now I don't know what they are doing, what they do
but they do. Yeah very good. Great question Stephen, well done. Now to you Josh.
So before we let Surya go to bed he doesn't need sleep. You don't need sleep.
Well done. Thank you. I just hope that my English was not too horrible. Your English is fantastic
and it's better every time I speak with you. Okay. Surya, sorry I think I have a question that many
people have which is you have all these amazing FOIA data. Is there a place where people you
know have you tried to make it publicly available? Is there a place where people can go?
I have a drop box into which I put some documents but if it's required to be honest the amount of
hot stuff is quite limited but I can share without any problem. No problem I will
put it on a drop box public link and I will share to anyone who is interested.
That's great. I will say that both Google documents and drop box can be,
the links can be cut. I'll try to find another solution. Yeah all right excellent. Thank you
for everything you do. Great. Thank you. Thank you Josh. Sasha.
Yes thank you sir. Actually I had the same question so some way of sharing this information
I'm working with also a number of law firms and people who have filed FOIAs and we need some
additional FOIAs filed for example. So maybe some expertise on that is very important because for
example there is very little that has been made available for Moderna and you know so that's one
place to dig and the other one is manufacturing information so module three from the licensing
application, DLA application, standard application. So module three for any of them. I know it's
probably the most difficult thing to get but that's critically important to take them all down.
So that's that was kind of my request and yeah I'd like to see what you have so that we avoid
duplication of efforts. Sure. Very good and Sasha's point is very relevant everybody for all these court
cases the government takes every single dirty trick it can and so that need to get the
incontrovertible evidence is so important and the digging that needs to be done and Gail McCray in
the chat has been talking about that we're working with David Martin all of that work
just accept there's a lot of work to get past the dirty tricks of government. Glenn.
Hi. One of my first questions is around the ability to cross reference things
since you've come up with so many different topics and had them associated with various kinds of
titles and keywords. I use the term cross reference because I think it's a very important
different topics and had them associated with various kinds of titles and keywords.
Are you aware of the of the regulations that gov system that records all of the public comment
submissions under regulations that gov and that entire database is keyword driven.
So it's very easy to go into it and it's three different cycles there was the five to eleven
year olds in October there was the six months to five year olds in February and then that got
repeated again in June. So when one goes into that system and does things like just does a search on
death or on a search on heart you get you get thousands of entries and so there may be some
things that people were angry about and knew about and posted them there but did otherwise
didn't make them public and because you can submit anonymously there's also you know maybe
opportunities there to cross match things of high interest. Okay I was not aware about that.
Yeah so last October had over 130 000, February had over 50 000,
June had a hundred over 150 000 but they only posted I mean they posted zero before the meeting
so that's a whole nother cover-up issue. So they ended up posting around 40 000 but that was
over a week past all of the meetings and decision points but so they are there they just didn't show
up ahead of time. The other question I had is and to Sasha also as we see more and more of this kind
of cover-up is is there any thinking process around having a uniform way of reporting it
so that it looks familiar to people that start pouring through the different materials.
Sasha recently did a report on Moderna relative to the the six-month to five-year-olds that I
thought was a very spectacular detail of you know in an excellent way of highlighting things
as she drilled into to you know she went past all the the noise and then found both items that were
intentionally absent or intentionally lied about. So the more we the public could start seeing
cover-up reporting in a consistent way I think that could be powerful.
Very good Glenn.
Very good all right Stephen before we let Surya go to bed or Albert do you have any questions of
Surya or Stephen and then Albert Surya you can go to bed and Albert will continue.
Yeah yeah I just wonder Surya are you in contact with lawyers in the UK, US, Australia?
Only Elizabeth from our own series office but I guess they are completely overloaded
now. Elizabeth Brown. She asked me a lot with my very first fire request.
So have you got evidence in your opinion which would be useful to lawyers?
Read the criminal fraud whatever you want to call it.
For the moment no I don't think so.
Concealment of crime?
Some good evidence on that.
No I'm not sure to have any single event for something to be used by lawyers.
What about regulatory failure?
Yeah currently in Europe I have a strange feeling all the things that happen just like if the law
didn't count anymore. This is where you know a few years ago when someone would break the law
for example manufacturers they would be punished in the end and a huge fine would be applied but
now it's I'm not sure if it's correct but it's a lawless world.
Surya it's important to lodge the evidence there so that when the time is up.
Yeah sure sure sure. If I grab anything interesting I will keep it but for the
moment I don't have any single event for that. Okay well Albert has stuff which is interesting.
Are you sure that if Albert were to look at your stuff that he wouldn't find something
interesting for the lawyers? Yeah I forgot one thing. I've asked my friends in Netherlands
to query all the mailboxes between Miriam Sturkenboom who is one of the greatest experts
in the world in pharmacoepidemiology and she has contracts with the EMA. Yeah I will tell you the
anecdote because I forgot about that but it's fun. I filed a FOIA request to the EMA requesting
all emails between Miriam Sturkenboom these great experts and several individuals at the EMA and
for the three first individuals a few weeks after my request the EMA got back to me and they said
oh we have no emails for those individuals. Okay but the last one if you don't say that you have
no emails it means that the emails do exist and a few months after that the EMA contacted me because
they received a FOIA request from an academic partner related to me and actually it was a
FOIA request filed by Miriam Sturkenboom about me about my own request and it seems that she didn't
like at all that a guy like me would be able to dig into her own mailbox at least about her own
conversations between a guy named Xavier Kurtz at the EMA and her. So I asked some friends in the
Netherlands to file a FOIA request directly to our university UMC Utrecht and to retrieve all
emails between her mailbox based at this university and the EMA and I guess they also
filed another FOIA request to retrieve all emails between her and all manufacturers
Pfizer, Moderna and so on. Maybe we will be able to find some odd stuff in it.
Sorry you mentioned disseminated intravascular coagulation. Absolutely we all
all those hematological events I guess there are problems everywhere. It's not only pulmonary
embolism and thrombotron deep venous thrombosis it's all kind of blood clots. So in the disseminated
intravascular coagulation have you seen any mention of paradoxical hemorrhage? No I don't think so.
I just can say about that that there is a very recent publication from a team based in
Scandinavia. They don't talk too much about it in the paper but it has been published in
the journal named Java Network Open in June and they found many statistically significant issues
with Pfizer and Moderna especially about blood clots and cardiovascular events.
Yeah have you got any numbers for these like deep venous thrombosis pulmonary embolism
or not? You haven't got any numbers for them no? In which way? From the stuff you've got from the
CDC and where ever. Okay I will have to show you something just give me one minute
AC I will share my screen if I can do.
Yes you can so yeah. Yeah and I wanted to ask you so have you this is just a very interesting
point that I'm interested in have you heard any mention of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis?
Oh yes yes yes there is a study I've investigated done in Scotland and there is a huge issue the
team doesn't discuss about that because they acknowledge the problem with the AstraZeneca
shot but not the Pfizer shot but if you look into the tables the numerical tables they give
they add three cases with the Pfizer vaccine within the 28 days window and
there are three cases of what? Cervical venous sinus? Yes yes CVT and there is zero case in the
in the control window. Right well. I filed FOIA request about that they gave me 250 pages of
documents and when I filed a FOIA request to retrieve all the stuff they were supposed to do
in the 28 days window actually they told me that they could not provide anything to me because
when they computed the confidence intervals they were too wide so they did not publish about that
but if actually their statistical model is wrong if you if you use a model based on a
Poisson distribution it's highly statistically significant. So Surya would you be interested in
an exchange of emails that I had together with Sukrit Bhakdi and others from the kind of
predecessor to this group. Sure. It's called Doctors for Covid Ethics and in the beginning of
2021 we wrote three times to the European Medicines Agency. Did you reply? Yes okay not
satisfactorily and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis was actually mentioned there
and the importance of anybody with headache was a potential victim of cerebral venous sinus
thrombosis and it was ignored. Completely. They had the email to me it's full cover up and full lockdown.
Sure yeah but the thing is those emails still exist and I think are important evidence because
they were warned about what's going on. So that was why I was asking about cerebral venous sinus
thrombosis. It sounds like a really rare thing but the point is that any headache
that should have been suspected and it should have been ruled out. Yeah it could be a CVT or stroke
or even yeah and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis as well. I'm sure there is a problem with
demyelination not only gbs but central demyelination. I've heard about transverse
mellitus and MS. I hope that everybody can see my slide. This slide has been shown by Tom
Shimabukuro in March 2021 and it's as you can see it's preliminary results of the VSD sequential
vaccinated concurrent comparator. For those who don't know what it is they use two different
methodologies. They compare the number of observed cases in vaccinated and it's compared to hysterical
comparator. It's some kind of a common observed to expected and they compare vaccinated individuals
to themselves but over two different time windows. On this slide they've used a primary
time window set to 21 days so it means that those individuals within the risk interval
are compared to the individuals in the control intervals meaning those individuals,
vaccinees who are between 22 and 41 days after the vaccination. And you can see that on this
line myocarditis pericarditis we have two observed cases versus zero expected. For stroke hemorrhagic
just below we have seven observed cases versus zero expected and for pulmonary embolism we have 19
observed cases versus zero expected. And for all those three lines they say that it's not statistically
significant. It's absolutely impossible to fail to reach statistical significance when you have 19
cases versus zero expected. You can use a Poisson distribution you can't put zero as expected so
you can put 0.1 and you will see that it's absolutely impossible. So just on this slide
the data log point is set at mid-13th February 2021. It has been shown in March
so it was clear in their own slides that for at least the three adverse events of specific
interest that they saw the problems. The myocarditis could be detected in February
two versus zero. Problems of strokes and the biggest safety signal it's a blood clot pulmonary
embolism. It has been embedded in venous thromboembolism just on the top. You can see that
they have in the VSD 23 observed cases versus 12 expected. If you use a Poisson distribution
you can see that it's also highly statistically significant. So they just lie when they say that
the statistical signal has not been triggered.
What distribution are they using? I don't know I would be curious to know their statistical
model. I'm sure it's wrong. Well it must be the same one they use in the JAMA paper they published
in September. To me the JAMA paper I could say it's fun because I filed a comment on the JAMA
and I've been censored within 15 minutes after posting the comments because they only show the
data with a 21 days time window at risk. In their own papers they state that they have
other analysis which are not presented. So I just posted a comment stating that it would be great
to have the other round of analysis they've done and described in the protocols and I've been rejected.
I'm surprised. Peter Doshi I filed my comment on the advice of Peter Doshi
and when I told him that I've been immediately censored he told me that I was not the first
one to report this kind of behaviour. Okay Stephen are you down because Shima's got his
hand up as well. Yes yeah go ahead. So Surya stop your share. Sure oh yes immediately.
Thank you Surya. Thank you for listening and one question please. Sure. There is this particular
famous document in Japanese about the bio distribution of the Pfizer shot.
I was wondering was it obtained as a result of a FOIA request in Japan or in the US?
As far as I know of yes I guess it's Peter Doshi who filed the FOIA request in Japan and he got the
document. Thank you I thought it was very interesting this FOIA request in Japan.
They also have a similar document that somebody got through a FOIA request in Australia.
Yes but in Australia they tend to over-redact everything.
Okay Stephen so can we let Surya go to bed before we get back to the comments. That's great thank
you all. Hang on wait wait Surya Stephen okay. Can you form a new French resistance?
Oh I'm afraid about all this FOIA stuff I'm afraid that I'm quite alone.
You're afraid what? That I'm quite alone. Quite alone yeah. Yeah all right let him go to bed.
No one in France knows about you. No one in France knows about you.
I tend to be quite I don't want to be exposed too much.
I'm the same yeah Charles the same. All right that's that's the way.
Hang out for a little bit Surya until you go to bed to turn this on in your pillow while you're
laying on your pillow. But thank you Surya so much. You know and just like you know just like
myself when Surya and I talk we you know we need help. We need angel money to keep us afloat.
We need to like you know stay working. So I know Surya didn't mention any of that but yeah he
I mean what a resource. When he reached out to me and I found him and I realized oh my god
and started hearing like his deep deep story there. I hear I'm just staying in my lane with
the VAERS stuff and you know I actually put together and submitted some VAERS ID numbers
that had been deleted but not just any old VAERS ID numbers. These particular VAERS ID numbers were
there's about 10 or 10 to 12 of them and they were either written by a contactable physician
which would be highly probable that they are authentic and not a false report because it says
in the report you know this is a contactable physician and or the death that was deleted
was not there wasn't another another person that fit that description assuming that it was like
a duplicate because that those are the two premises that they can delete reports. So assuming that
it's a it's a duplicate I go look for the twin duplicate and I couldn't even find like a 31
year old female that passed away in May on you know in in January at all of two that you know
2022 or something like that. So I gave him some very specific ones and that's what Surya made
mention to that we he's got a few in in the works of that but he said you know he doesn't have high
hopes that he's going to be successful but point being Surya's in his outfit he's not he's not like
a lone ranger and he's not completely unknown because Brian Hooker knows about him and you know
Josh knows about him so I mean he gets gets around a little bit you know in the down low but yeah what
a resource I think if you guys can reach out to your attorney friends and let them know that this
guy exists this group exists in France and and start start connecting the dots and we could all
start pushing in the same direction that would be helpful. So Albert so you think that Surya is
sitting on evidence which would be useful to lawyers do you? I do. Well he doesn't think that so
yeah but I think you're right. I think he has got a lot of evidence you know to the right person I
guess to the right person it's valuable you know I think that one that that that has my name on it
and there's analysis name on it about the the Alaskan death and you know that bears one is
is valuable but anyways yeah thank you thank you Surya thank you to the group.
So I'm ready to I'm ready to kick off my my half my portion I'll be fast if I can share my screen
I'm just gonna jump right in and get going oh yes I need I'm disabled. Yeah um is Charles there
because I don't think I can let's have a look. Uh oh maybe he went to the bathroom.
Um let's just see whether I can do it nope I'm still on this yeah we'll have to wait
till he comes back Albert. Okay well no worries I was I was just gonna run through a PowerPoint
presentation of about uh 10 slides real fast I just wanted to get them on screen just for
replay purposes um somebody asked if Tom Renz uh really be helped by getting info on what questions
how to ask. Yeah you know I um I've spoken to Tom Renz personally on the phone a couple of times
um a while back in the beginning and um I actually told him about the fire the um the bears report
that I submitted myself on behalf of my uncle who stroked he's still alive but he stroked on his uh
30 days after his second Moderna shot and I videotaped the whole thing like a how-to that's
what it originally started you know how to submit uh a uh a bears report and uh so I went through
the whole process I didn't realize that you have to send an additional email to info.gov to cdc at
info.gov no info at cdc.gov to request your finalized uh record and um you know so I realized oh my
gosh there's so many people that file reports that do not do that and then therefore they don't know
which one is their report and I think that people on the other side they know which ID numbers are
in process that nobody's requested for a finalized ID number that's a part of the secret sauce I
think right there for them they know which ones that they can pluck off and never publish at all
but anyways the the second part and the more important part of that story is that when I
got the report back they they omitted uh words and phrases out of my first-hand account write-up
and they also invented symptoms and smqs basically diagnoses that my uncle did not have
he wasn't psychosis he didn't have no psychosis anyway didn't have Parkinson's
yet that appeared in the report and they invented that stuff and I will testify under oath
and attestation in court that that is not true my uncle is was was as fit as a as a horse um
but anyways I told Tom Renz about that one and everybody you know everybody gets excited about
that but nobody follows up with me but I'm here I'm no I haven't heard of anybody wanting to
uh making a case like that I believe that that VAERS themselves filed a false claim a false
report on my behalf on the patient's behalf you invented stuff I wonder how much I wonder how
many other reports you you concoct but anyways I digress I'm just trying to use up time before
yeah is Charles here I wonder uh Charles are you there oh yeah I'm here I'm here I'm trying to
trying to get my screen to share my screen good sorry Albert I uh I have to go to you know that
well-known place talk to a man about a horse correct okay you can now share your screen
Albert okay got it here I go I'm just jumping in jumping in here
here we go fast let me put it in presentation mode
this presentation mode okay so I'm just going to run down um this is this is hot off the press
this is the the um this week's data including this week's drop on Friday from VAERS this is
from the wonder system and uh immediately I draw your eye to the very bottom of the screen this
is a big problem now approaching almost 900,000 reports that they consider that that is actually
classified as none of the above and I know that there's a lot of new faces in the zoom so I'll
explain this quickly again but when these reports are filed and and health care workers or the
patients themselves they don't check the boxes off they give very detailed information like yeah I
had a heart attack and my I have blood clots in my calves and blah blah blah all that stuff but they
forget to check off the boxes of what you know did they land in the ER did they get hospitalized
is it a permanent disability I mean my uncle who didn't die he I checked off like four boxes for
him because he landed in the ER then was admitted to the hospital it was life-threatening and he's
not the same so he's got permanent disability so he had like four different different boxes checked
off which is the reason why down at the bottom the 111 percent there's way more you know there's 1.5
million events reported against the official 1.3 million unique patients because uh basically 11
percent of these uh patients these unique ID numbers are checked off more than one and so
checked off more than once in these boxes so um this is just a summary I took the bottom
um I said show me all the reports but by territory so you know Wyoming is the last on the list and
then I put here as you can see our American what we consider our American territories
and this is just by events so from here we can't tell how many deaths but uh you see the foreign
how much how much constitutes the foreign now over 500,000 records but this part is frustrating
um you know 100 115,000 reports that we don't know where in the continental United States
um that you know they're from the patients from uh the you know the male female gender thing
um you know however many that says uh three three percent and let me go to the next one
okay so here's the money shot here this one is pretty incredible so the same report now by age
for COVID-19 you can see I draw your eye to the bottom there's 400,000 reports 29 call that 30
we'll speak in round numbers 30 400,000 records that have an unknown age um I did some quick
calculations and just the kids 17 and under that's 52,000 reports and this is a snapshot from my
dashboard where you could see that I've I basically for those that don't know many times a lot of times
uh the age is is clearly documented in the in the write-up of the of the actual report
but the but the age field is left empty is blank um they don't you know bears doesn't help us out
and and and populate you know make a supervisory decision and populate the age field with with age
because it's clearly written in the document no they they let it go um leaving us all you know
needing uh analytics experts to figure out you know something like this to say well I have found
over 200 and I don't know what that what the difference is uh from 122,000 to 400,000 I mean
over 250,000 or so records where I've actually been able to see the age and then populate the
age field um let me move this thing out of the way um so what I'm saying here and that I have
579 kids that the actual report doesn't tell me the specific age but they tell me that this is a
neonate this is an infant this is a fetus this is a child this is an adolescent this is a teenager
something like that so so I can't put the actual number age in there but I just type it in this is
a child this is a baby so 579 so so for kids 17 and under you know my my um quick math plus the
579 I got I got 64,500 kids to to their 52,000 see so I got I got almost 12,000 additional kids
that I in effect pulled out of this unknown this unknown age bucket and you know that that makes a
big difference uh when you're when you're doing analysis based on age stratified uh data um
so also with that there is a very big problem of under I call it undercoding Greg part of
cooper might call it under counting but we know that there are very serious adverse events in that
now approaching 900 reports of none of the above you can see that I have so in my dashboard I have
basically captured and reclassified in my dashboard I've upcoded them so I've upcoded
chest pains um as an example here my color code says I've upcoded them to emergency so I've found
them in none of the above uh or office visit and I've classified all the chest pains or this many
chest pains to to um emergency there's there's death in none of the above I mean just for starters
there's cardiac arrests um thrombo cytopenia is the myocarditis in none of the above there's a ton
of kids with chest pain and they classify it as none of the above not serious so there's there's
my starter kit 56 000 and I think I could squeeze out another another 40 000 and make it 100 000
that's that's part of my part of my work there and um now on to the right side manufacturer
and lot mismatches this this goes to the um to you know to the toxic lot um analysis plenty of
reports that tell us the manufacturer is moderna but then they give us a Pfizer lot
and then I have it by you know I color I have it color coded that I could say well you know I have
so many reports that I've actually changed and some of these were permanent disabilities you know
of course a lot of them were office visit none of the above but they're serious we got to re
read the code re-upcode some of these but there's my list right there and so I have right now I
think I have a little more than this I probably have 6 000 now but so I have 6 000 reports that
I can each and every one of them I I can't lose it in my dashboard I can look at every single one
and say I change this to that I change that to that and that's what my that's what my that's the
the power of my of my dashboard now I hope I invited Jessica Rose um I had the the distinct
honor of of um talking to her over this zoom meeting at the blackout this was the pan data stuff
earlier this week um excellent report and I you know I love to take her analysis and then try to
duplicate it and find the same thing and and I asked her a question and I hope she doesn't mind
but I asked her I said what do you do to cleanse your data for the age stratified stuff you know
do you is there some kind of uh you know in between or how does it work or do how many do
you have to exclude from this from this because you know we just saw that what was it almost 30
30 percent of the entire database is unknown age what do you do well she she told me that she
doesn't she doesn't cleanse at all she has to she has to omit those omit a third of the database
and that's where I want to be a supplement to to her and to people like her all around the world
who's doing this who can use the dashboard but more importantly for people like Jessica um
download the master file and get that jump start so we don't have to duplicate our efforts
so wow 30 percent of unknown ages um this is just a snapshot a cover of my um of my dashboard and
right here um I'm just showing this is my entire 32 year dashboard where I isolated just unknown
vax types this is another big issue you can see right here that um on based on the historical data
we had no more than um a few hundred claims a year historically and then all of a sudden
when the when the vax when the jab rollout started in 2020 most of this uh histogram bar here for 2020
by vac state is the last half of december so that most of that is um you know is is probably
covet 19 even though you know you may not I may not be able to prove all of that but I've definitely
peeled that peeled out a couple of thousand reports already that where it says in the write-up or if
not the write-up it gives like a moderna lot number or a pfizer lot number so you can see
unknown vax type we got to we got to focus our laser beam light on the unknown vax type and get
to these ones because you know if the clue doesn't tell us it chances are it's probably um a covet a
covet jab based on this historical data but uh you know I just I just point that out
um mass deletions is a big thing they've been mass deleting uh claims um everybody it seems
like most people know now that they're doing that uh they've got a total of over 22,000 total
but just in the last 16 weeks they've deleted 15,000 reports um you know I've done an analysis
saying the not so early warning system and here is the uh the blurb right here that you find every
time you go to download uh every week to download their data you'll see that it's that this blurb
right here de-identified bears data are available four to six weeks after reports is received so that
means they have up to up to four to six weeks because they definitely receive reports and then
turn around and publish them like real quick within eight days they don't they don't hold
on to everything for four to six weeks and then and then um and then publish it but then again
there's a ton of reports that they take well over six weeks matter of fact this last drop there was
over 80 there was like about 80 reports that were basically held in their possession of the
emergencies I'm sorry it was 68 emergencies that's that's what it was 68 emergency reports
that were brought up this Friday that were held in their possession over six months 198 days before
they actually published it and we the people actually saw it that my friends is called
throttling they that's what they do um apart from apart from mass deletions um
here's just a snapshot from my Microsoft Excel uh reports deletion deletion reports so I keep track
on the Excel spreadsheet as well as my Tableau dashboard and I try to duplicate everything I
can do in Excel I try to duplicate it in Tableau but you can see right here um you know the
frequency here they they've came down a little bit but I kind of feel like the frog in the pot
of water where I'm saying now oh they've only deleted 300 reports this week which was like
used to be kind of their average but even that is too much you know 300 reports a week that's
ridiculous when they have four to six weeks to to rigorously authenticate a claim you know
make the sausage and determine is this a false report or is this a duplicate okay it it looks
it looks authentic let's publish it therefore they don't have to delete uh reports and if they do at
least at least we the people know that that report once existed and now they deleted it and um you
know we should be able to find the twin duplicate but no I you know I've said this a bunch of times
before I could find maybe only 10 percent I've spot checked about 2 000 reports and I could only
find maybe 10 percent of those 2 000 with the twin duplicate
so jumping over to foreign there's so much foreign data there's that 500 000
reports and there is a two-digit country code embedded in one of those columns of data it's
called the split type data but anyways it you know with that I'm off to the races I can determine
at least what country they came from so you know the international community that's watching this
video um there's plenty of data in there and you can you know use the dashboard to walk it down
and see you know what what's going on by country and you know you can click on this worldometer
picture right here and it'll launch you launch you to the worldometer so you can see um you know
this action right here where you can get the the population of the countries and here's a little
blurb that says the foreign countries like why do we get foreign data I've been you know I've been
trying to figure this out for for months a year now and I've had this I mean
uh US manufacturers that were reported to their foreign subsidiaries so you know I think all the
governments are the subsidiary of big pharma that's how I read that uh but it says under FDA
regulations if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that
is both so I get I take it that it's both serious and unexpected it has to be both of those things
unexpected in other words does not appear in the product labeling like uh sure okay well you know
begs the question why are you giving us all this low level stuff then all this none of the above
in office visits if it's supposed to be serious and unexpected that's another question for later
but um that would that would explain why the foreign lots look a lot more kind of toxic
than the domestic lots and there are there are lots that go both domestically and international
um you know they kind of cross over like that unexplainable but even with that said
and uh you know I always think of Simon when I see this one because he was the one who told me like
Belgian look at Belgian and their permanent disabilities the size of Belgian uh you know
11 million people and they're giving us in the system uh 6400 permanent disabilities you know
against ours the USA we got 13 000 permanent disabilities but look how much bigger we are
than Belgium is so you know in this blurb here I'm thinking hey you know what I think the foreign
data is probably more truthful than our American data we got too many barriers over here um but
anyways that's what this that's what this one was about um I'm gonna eventually do an analysis and
use the matrix the percentages of of these this foreign data and apply it to the domestic data
and I bet you that would be more realistic of what's going on as far as uh the the reports
I always throw this one out this this slide out follow-up reports do not appear people
no follow-up reports and that wasn't always the case um they did they did um append append the
the the VAERS record with follow-up data um in 2000 all the way to the end of 2010 and it says
it in the CDC's blurb itself but here is the report here is the blurb the official blurb that
says that follow-up reports do not appear and they say it five times five different ways they
don't they don't they don't delete reports and put a report back on there although they do it but not
for not because the patient died so now they're going to delete the original one and repost
repost it now as a death uh that I haven't really seen that at all um but you know they continue to
receive uh continuous updates including revisions new reports and proceed for preceding time
periods yeah but they don't make it public follow-up reports do not appear so you know
as an example the 12 000 this this number is a little higher now but the 12 000 underage kids
um that are in there is none of the above they're just they're just recorded as an
administration error because they were underage my god underage if it you know they develop
myocarditis down the road we're not going to know about it I mean that's that's one way man
that's one way to stack the deck in their favor um so here's the here's the series here's the
latest thing this on Thursday this came out um you know the FOIA and everybody's uh you know
including myself Craig Particooper Sasha's in there of course we are um looking at the data
chopping up the data that that they just gave us and um trying you know we're trying to see how
toxic the lots are again um at least they gave us the sizes of the lot and I was telling somebody
and I want to verify this with Sasha and Craig Particooper am I seeing this right or am I
doing the formulas right because it's looking like you know we we we you know I've heard it say that
doses and this is doses of shipped not in not administered into arms but just shipped I guess
to refrigerators um or at least manufactured that um you know the the lot sizes were anything from
like 700 000 to a million to a million and a half doses per lot um these numbers are are much higher
so I don't know if my math is right but you know the total I got 425 million doses which
I explained to a close friend you know how much how much does this constitute did how many how
many lots did they not give us and um you know over here my my uh my heat map each column this
is kind of looking like how bad is your batch right um but each column has its own color condition
a heat map so you can see you know just staring at this that something like a two a third of the
way down this this um lot en6202 uh the relative toxicity now I got my own formula for that it's
pretty pretty awesome I think I'm pretty good with that relative toxicity but this one relatively
speaking is is toxic is pretty toxic but it only has 2,700 total events but against that it has
106 deaths it's proportionate amount of permanent disability so that's how the the whole color you
got to stare at it for a while for the colors to kind of make sense to you but um that's what
that's what that was about that's what I was doing since Thursday um
and this is a this is a shot from my from my dashboard um and it's just just an example I
took Moderna and I took just Moderna with expiration dates by uh for the month of March
and I can start to see it like like this and you can scooch from left to right so you can really
get creative and view and pivot on this data a thousand different ways that's why I like
dashboards I you know one picture just isn't enough for me I gotta keep I gotta make it turn
it into like a movie like moving pictures um but that's just a sample um I was hoping uh
Surya was still awake but this was the this was the this is the smoking gun right here this was
the two-year-old Alaskan kid death that um you know Highwire and Aaron Ciri uh reported on
and although Aaron Ciri is a Highwire's attorney it was my work I caught that lightning in a bottle
that day and then of course uh my my yoda my my master yoda uh Wayne from various analysis dot
info you know help help me in the sense that like he vetted it he goes yep he asked me questions
when when the other ones the other people do you know shoot me off these other some of these other
people like oh I don't know I didn't get that I didn't get that well you weren't the you weren't
the first one I did download it in the first few minutes you must have downloaded like five
minutes after or an hour after it dropped I downloaded it in the first minute that's how
I got lucky but anyways where Aaron Ciri got no records found got a response back from from
um CDC or HHS technically it was HHS that said no records found
Mr. Suria in his infinite wisdom and the way he filed his this report here is the smoking gun
where John Sue sends an email out to all his cronies heavily redacted and there's more pages
there this was a 16 page uh report all of it's basically redacted but here is the number here is
the ID number where they you know they were saying I guess it's a different uh the next page
that says ah we think it's fake but the way John to me the way John Sue asked his cronies like hey
I think this is fake can you look into it just by saying it that way that is a tip off to his
cronies how he wants his cronies to respond back to him that's what I get but anyways the point is
is that ID number does not exist 1887456 it it never it was never officially published to be
deleted even it never made it it was alive it was visible for for three minutes and then disappeared
hoping that nobody would know the difference and then they tell Aaron Ciri no records on it
this is the smoking gun people right here
here but anyways um you know just to show you that this isn't my first rodeo and I bring up
uh brook jackson and uh uh robert barnes barnes law and uh warner mendenhall if he's involved
with the brook jackson case but my old boss uh chris rydell here in cambell california who
owned hunter laboratories where I worked for 10 years this is my baby daughter she's not such a
baby anymore she's 16 now but anyways I ran his billing operation at hunter labs for 10 years
and he just came out with this book he won he's the biggest I bring him up because he's the biggest
whistleblower in America single person whistleblower and when if and when uh brook
jackson wins god bless her heart I hope she wins it makes billions of dollars she's going to
dethrone my my old boss here chris rydell you can see you can see this and he puts down here in his
book that he just released on in um october november of 2021 one man's bare-knuckle fight to
tech taxpayers for medical fraud got camilla harris's name on there but I'll forgive him for
that but he one man's bare-knuckle fight I like to think I like to think I was one of those knuckles
in that bare-knuckle fight just to let you guys know and uh thank you guys that's a quick one I
wanted to jump in I just wanted to leave this here I wanted to jump in now if I could to um
just two minutes to show you the uh the dashboard my own dashboard just just poke around and move
it for a few minutes and uh let me just refresh that for a second just so you can actually see
it move I didn't even show you this the symptom search on this thing I'll give it a second here
um you know by manufacturer so I didn't even talk about uh the monkey pox and the nova vax that
has it has appeared but then it has the color schema you can see um you know how that works
kind of the darker the color is basically the more severe the event and then the foreign
the color scheme is the same as the color scheme so you can see the color scheme is the same as the
more severe the event and then the foreign so this is all of our foreign and then I got it um
dissected by the blue states and red states and our unknown domestic continental united states and
the territories um the male and female pie right here a lot more females than males but then in the
deaths it's more males than females um the lots that you can uh you know so this is true so many
lot numbers are just blank don't have a lot number at all the other the the next biggest are are ones
that just unknown it says unavailable uh request from the pharmacy a truncated lot you just can't
make sense of it and then so that's why it makes the rest of it so so flat so black you know you
can't see any of the numbers there my relative a lot toxicity uh data that I won't bother to
explain right now in the interest of time but you know any one of these things that you click on
it'll move all these all these graphs all at one time by age year look at that in specific
age if you want to you know look at it by specific age just 33 year olds in texas or something female
for some strange reason you want to dissect it but that's that's how this is now this is by
territory same exact graph but one is by a with uh stacked by event level and then the other one
is just color of red state blue state and you can see the foreign that's why the foreign jumps out
because the the domestic stuff is broken into red states and blue states and if you could see like
puerto rico might pop up here as a green that's the our territories um but i'm almost done two
more minutes i just wanted to show you this uh symptom search right here and i just made some
videos about it um but i applied the symptom search in here and what this is telling me is that
you know 1.36 million records generates over five million total symptoms and then um you know so
what you can do here is you can do something like this actually search for uh like myocarditis as an
example since uh craig did a did an excellent uh review on this um myocarditis let me get it
myocarditis acute myocardial infarction let that one come in for a second it'll start to
there it pops up and not to gild the lily here but let me just go down and pick out because i
didn't realize there was so there was a few flavors of myocarditis so there's the regular
there's bacterial infectious uh good enough just to just to drive home the point that now
you can use this and i can see wait a minute you're telling me that in myocarditis on mine i have
3300 that are office that are myocarditis that are office visits
and and then an additional 86 that's none of the above is that true is that true let me show you
how i've connected it to um i'm going to take off all the heavy all the heavy stuff
the heavy events and just look at the low level the low hanging fruit none of the above office visits
and and none of the above oh and take off the birth defects see i see a little purple in there
so i'm going to take off birth defect and now i'm going to jump over to meta alerts how i
connected it to meta alerts and has 424 records is that could that be true let's vet let's authenticate
because i am sincere i am without wax i am genuine and so is my dashboard so here you go ending in
630 uh this one flies on the flytrap unknown location of course myocarditis there's the
myocarditis and you can see the report nothing is checked no life threatening no office visit no er
you know so this one to the casual observer to the rest of the world this is none of the above
not serious hence safe and effective look how look how safe and effective this uh this experiment
is you know almost 900 000 reports are none of the above uh this is the age here's a night here's a
couple of 19 year olds right here right in this little section right here let's take a look at them
foreign no age oh look at look at this one has a no age how do i know that it's actually 19 years old
that it actually has myocarditis that they actually came from germany that's the two digit
country code right there uh and that they're 19 years old how do i know that well because
it's clearly written right here 19 years old now myocarditis this to the casual observer to the
rest of the world that's none of the above not serious safe and effective that's the problem
with this that's the problem with this database it just needs to be cleaned up it just needs to be
given a little bit of love that the people entrusted to maintain it do not give it any love
and then when we go do our analysis for toxic lots then we shoot ourselves in the foot so to
speak and we we shave off we shave off the low level none of the above or we shave off because
we don't populate the age so there is so much stuff here where that's where i want to be a
supplement to to not only the analytical people um so that they can you know use the dashboard
themselves to know where to go look that that's how i use my dashboard to go find which ones with
400 myocarditis i need to up up code to uh depend depending on the report and that's you know segwaying
into working with uh my buddy my new friend uh hawk gary hawk who i think is in the audience
so appropriate that he's the hawk and i'm the eagle but we're doing um automated automated data
cleansing using python language python probability tools and so that's some heavy that's some cool
stuff right there that we're going to basically what i've been doing manually by hand faithfully
giving my you know giving giving my life up for this because nobody's doing it quite quite like
i'm doing it and i just want to help i just want to be a supplement um look at this acute myocardial
infarction jeez i was just messing around uh how old is this person we don't know eagle says he's 62
um and is none of the above look at that none of the above not serious and who submitted that report
what's that who submitted the report who submitted the report well it could have been the patient or
a or a hospital i seem to think i seem to feel based on thousands of these reports that i read
when it's a myocardial infarction especially that they landed in the hospital and possibly it was
the hospital who who did this because a patient so that category is stripped away from the report
what's that the category of submitter is stripped away from the stored report that's never it's
never really in in the report sometimes it may say in here in the write-up that's that's the
only place it's going to say there's not a dedicated field that says who submitted um
um you know bring up the two-year-old for the last good two-year-old hang on
albert albert this two minutes has become 12 minutes now okay okay well let me let me wrap
it up let me wrap it up that's that was sorry about that that was uh just how the um me unshare my
screen that was basically how that oh am i off no hold on
oh stop screen
there we go sorry i you know that um you know basically the bottom line is i've had a lot of
help to get me here um i've i've sharpened iron with a lot of good people i've tried to sharpen
iron with a lot of more people i want to be a supplement um i need help i need i you know i
need i need um i need financial help so i'm gonna start i'm gonna start this um website one way or
another but i need a uh angel consulting i i don't want i want to be i don't want to be censored i
don't want amazon to shut me down uh you know or some web hosting to shut me down because they
don't they don't like what i'm what i'm doing so i need kind of like technical help and web
design or who to go with and that type of stuff but but you can see you can see there that that
um the world without knowing without saying it explicitly the world is hungry for an intuitive
interactive dashboard which is which is what i got going and this is the stuff i've been doing
for ceos um in my journeys they keep me in the basement making them making them executive level
dashboards like what you just saw and um you know i uh it's going to happen one way or another
all right you've made it clear albert what what do you need so thank you um glenn glenn your question
will come but first before we get to that question rima has an interesting strategy
very relevant to what we're talking about in this group so rima wants a couple of minutes to share
that before she has to leave and then put your hand up for questions glenn put your hand up for the
first question to albert and rima would you like me to share that document or you want me to share
yes i have i have shared the document it's called strategic framework um i appreciate even a couple
of minutes to share this uh there's a lot to it but basically my strategic analysis of the situation
that we're facing globally is that the uh the war machine that is coming towards us and destroying
or intent upon destroying national sovereignty and personal sovereignty uh is the who in its uh
in its connection with the united nations and we've talked a lot about that and so on so
we can't negotiate with the terrorists this is a terrorist criminal organization uh collaboration
with many other pieces to it um so my thought was okay let's kill it and uh in order to do that
we need to remove the pseudo legitimacy which it has granted to itself or which the uh the nation
states have granted to it by entering into treaties and agreements treaties and agreements can be
abrogated and they can be withdrawn from but the only way that that will happen given how
incredibly well funded and organized and so on this particular terrorist organization is
the only way that will happen in my estimate is if there is a global popular uprising uh based around
the words don't you dare um and so i have created i've been meeting with a group of people uh in
asia representing uh activists and professionals in eight countries i'm talking to people in the
eu in the u.s canada um and the the plan is for local regional and um uh organizational diversity
you want to do it this way do it this way you want to do it that way do it that way all focused on
the same strategic objective which is kill who and then hashtag kill who space before who kills
you it's not polite it's not um uh courteous to say that sort of thing and that's precisely
the point because polite and courteous is insufficient to deal with the threat and
we all know how massive and deadly the threat is so i'm going to put my email in the chat
and i'm going to ask you to reach out to me and uh join the discussion uh and see if this is
meaningful for you your organization your region uh and so on i believe that this is a difficult
but doable objective and frankly from my point of view my understanding is if we don't do this
we die so uh i'll put my email and my phone number if you can put the email in and also put the
document in again because it was early in the chat that you put it up i i just put it in a little
while ago but i will certainly put it in again uh and thank you so much and i i have to leave in
in a minute or two but i will do this i'll put the document in and my email and phone number
excellent thank you thank you rima for sharing your thinking please have a read of that strategic
plan glen it's coming one moment beautiful there it is is it did that pop up did it populate
one second no no yeah oh okay so i'll put my now i'll put my uh my data in thank you no it's not
yet not yet there no well then i'll do it again do it again all right while you're doing that well
done rima on your thinking everybody please take on board think about the strategic plan we've got
world war three here this is part of this is one of the battles um so glen questions that are new
keep going with that element because i got river on before before three three p.m go comment to you
albert uh while the your your history and your skill set is around roll-ups and statistical
patterns uh i want to encourage you to you there are times you need to do drill downs
and show individual stories now you pointed out some with conditions and
in ages but you didn't really dig into some of the individual ones so right now could you pull
up the uh the the two-year-old and sort of walk us through what was said in the report and and
and what can be inferred from the kind of things that were said um actually i i i included in my
i can include the download a 32 page document this is from there's the story the backstory is
written on on waynes bears analysis dot info and the actual report itself um so i can i can do that
um i don't have access well i do have access to the pdf i don't know do i have time or
if there's a specific place that it is detailed just put that in the chat yeah definitely right
yeah i will right right here that's what i was thank you that's right coming right i want to
comment i mean you opened up a few of them but you kind of jumped it up and down it you didn't even
leave us time to sort of read some of the details yeah i'm so sorry it's all text that's jammed
together it's it's not paragraphs and things if there's times when you could go down and highlight
things so it's more readable it stands out and and and a personal story sticks in people's brain
yeah no no i i totally understand mr mako i i have 400 videos of weekly audits for now a year
and a half of exactly that where i'm reading reports but you know for for this for this audience
i just kind of had to do it that way just to show you the capabilities of this dashboard and and
that that my dashboard can be authenticated one report at a time against uh against the med alerts
data so uh but thank you i'll take that i'll do a better job next time thank you thanks so the
question everybody the question that albert raises which is a an interesting one is who can albert
get funding from and there are many organizations of it so that you've put that out here but there
are groups so clearly there's truth for health has funding for court cases there are lawyers
who have funding for court cases your data is relevant for court cases and the question is
if any of you have suggestions as to where albert there are which organizations he should approach
for funding and surya for funding uh because there are people with money who realize the
existential threat but they have to be asked yeah if i can if i can mention i wanted to bring up uh
miss stew frost uh now a dear friend and she's she's local i can go to her and shake her hand
and say thank you she's in sacramento i'm in san jose which uh um yeah i'm wanting to you know if
i get with any uh non-profit so to speak i want it to be i want it to be su su frost's non-profit
guerrilla learning um but you know apart from that i don't know if she has a minute a minute
to speak about that one but before that i just wanted to i just wanted to give a couple of
shout outs um just quickly uh raiman obams when dr raiman obams bombs away um uh who's
passed away is not with us brandy vaughn of uh uh learn the risk dot org um the late brandy vaughn
her website on learn the risk dot org has probably the best um dashboard bears dashboard i've seen so
far i still i'm gonna make mine better but that one is pretty darn good but it's but it's made out
of uh microsoft power power bi so it's made up so it's made in microsoft unfortunately um dr robert
o young who was just on robert fulmick my god he's one of my favorites if you get the chance to see
him on uh robert o young dr jerry waters what what what what a man of integrity he actually
he actually went out and and supported me and and made a made a comfortable a sizable
a donation to my to my cause god bless you dr waters i just wanted to mention that okay
thank you guys keep asking me questions but on the issue of brandy vaughn who clearly was murdered
and she forewarned her death um and the regulatory authority said nothing to see here does anybody
know if any if anything further is going on with her murder because clearly she was healthy and fit
and she did a video says if i die it's not because i had an accident or because i got sick does anyone
know
okay we don't so just keep your eyes peeled for that that was about two years ago i reckon
and brandy was the most courageous former big pharma employee he's realized the fraud and so
the the link is in the chat for learn the risk.org now there are people here um there are people
we finished this at 8 30 tom rodman has put a call in sorry put a link into the video chat on
telegram after we finish the formalities here so that's that's follow the link through there now
one other announcement i want to remind you of that i made last week because we've got such a
moving population um warner mendenhall advises over 16 000 legal cases going on in the us at the
moment against all aspects of covid so so bobby ann cox addressed us last week but 16 100 everybody
i think you should be excited by that there's a lot of stuff going on and then elbert if you make
your services available as daria put into the chat that is an expert witness you can be paid
and then you can help to extract specific data for specific specific cases so if you contact warner
then make though your expert advice expert advice available for those court cases okay
and you get paid by the hour for doing so well and thank you god bless you i mean more than anything
i just want to make this dashboard available to the poorest people around the world with the cell
phone that can see the data and make the decision for themselves to not get the shot i mean and help
the analytics people and help the attorneys but the people i want to help first and foremost
are the are the regular people on the street to see the data god bless you that's well one of the
things your your data and what you derive from it i suggest you share that with leave lead on truth
for health you've also got vax choice you've got children's health defense just keep sharing
insights because then they will share that insight and vax choice for example if if you if any of you
don't go to vax choice i'll put the link in va x choice.com it is a wonderful daily newsletter
with three or four magnificent memes and elbert if you've got a crucial piece of data or suria's got
a crucial piece of data share it with vax choice they'll put it on and and get it out because
your the huge amount of data the person in the street cannot cope with it but a meme
a funny meme an outrageous meme they can that's what i would recommend here's sue frost well done
on your support of elbert thank you sue i just wanted to say albert thank you so much for your
work and and i i love your mission of making it easier for the average person to understand
what's in the various database but what you're doing goes so far beyond that because
like there you're creating a way for us to quantify what's actually happening and to actually
easily see it in a pictorial format and you know i've been going back i know you've been helping
me with some research to go back and look at the hr 5546 which is the national childhood vaccine
act of 1986 and i'm trying to identify the the the exact wording of what does what is cdc or fda
do what is their charge and are they doing it because there's a lot of confusion at the state
and local level if if i as a county supervisor ask my public health officer and i have several times
you know what is um why aren't we looking at theirs what about all you know the all these people
that are being injured and i've gone through all the injuries and what they basically say is we don't
look at bears we have um we have some databases that we're managing in at the california level but
the cdc is the one who manages bears and i said so do they report to you you know what they're
seeing there and she said yes but no it's like divide and conquer it's like there's so many
different ways that someone can report they're not all reporting to one system and no one's looking
at bears because they're delegitimizing it and so if there is a charge in that law on what the
you know cdc or fda was supposed to do i think we need to in on the legal side hold them to that
and create um some way for for us to better monitor and record adverse reactions so that we
can you know there's accountability so you're bringing that and you you know i'll do anything
i don't think there's time to really go into you know guerrilla learning but you know just i'll just
quickly say guerrilla i'm here to support in any way i can we have a a non-profit um in california
that was born out of covid we our initial protest was to bring um news to the world that there are
treatments and we brought jay bodhicharya and george farid and joe ladapo and steve kursh to
and we really raised a hundred thousand dollars and we really thought at that time in january
21 that that was going to be the open it to the world and then everyone would know there's
treatments and it was amazing is the amount of um censorship that we received and um fast forward
to now we are partnered with this uh constitutional sheriff and peace officers association to bring
them to california and get constitutional studies in every california county so we have an
infrastructure that we're building and i think um albert is considering doing uh the re we offer
a re-grant program whereby a committee or or anyone can operate under our non-profit with their
approved project of our board and we have some board members who attend this call regularly
kathy allard is dr kathy allard i don't know if she's here today and um also deborah caprazo who's
intricately involved in our company and so this is something i do on the side because i can't
fix everything at the public level we're doing everything we can and i'm super excited about
albert and and his project so we'll see where this goes but we're gonna this is this is we're
hitting a tipping point they can't hold the news back anymore people are talking about it everywhere
and so thank you albert for the presentation today thank you sue and two of you are quite
correct that as there are 16 000 plus cases more and more judges are not are not assuming that
anybody who's questioning the cvc or the fda is a nutcase anti-vaxxer and so it's becoming easier
in the courts and and bobby and cox's story last week is very relevant that that companies
and states pass and bureaucrats pass regulations that are simply unlawful but it takes time to get
that through the courts all right anyone have thank you for that sir anyone have any suggestions
questions that they would like that they would like
so my feeling albert about your evidence is that you need so you're a data expert as i understand
it and um and you don't necessarily see the importance of the things you uncover so you
kind of think oh that's interesting um but i'm a little bit worried that a lot of the stuff that
i'm a little bit worried that a lot of the stuff that you are capable of turning up
is not going anywhere uh because my feeling is that you maybe need some help to
to uh you need to tell a friend or someone you're working with what your thoughts are about
what you're uncovering and that person needs to be intelligent enough or well informed enough to
pick up uh the importance of what you're saying for lawyers for example uh both now and in the
future so one of the things i think that would be and i haven't heard you mention this i don't think
so i i think it'd be really helpful if you were to go into theirs what what it was
the history of it you know and um and also what is expected of them by americans and the rest of
the world because it's not just americans who report to theirs um um so i don't know whether
that makes sense but no yeah i uh yeah just uh you know i understand people's selective perception
um and everybody has one i could tell you that there's been a dozen nights that i've cried by
myself not for me for the kids for this depopulation um you know so much so that i
i'm just a medical biller but i do not want to participate in the medical industry any longer
and i and i walked out and so yeah you know yeah i mean now i'm in stealth mode like charles says
this is a war this is a straight up spiritual warfare and i'm in like stealth mode and although
i you know i i i wear my heart on my sleeve when i have to but the other times i know i'm kind of
i don't know what the word is crass or i don't know like oh look at this person look at this
child with the heart attack oh my god it kills me it kills me so so so deeply um yes but you would
want you presumably would want to nail these people responsible for this so and that means
that we need someone to help you to to realize what's important about what you're talking about
i don't know what charles would say yeah no i know that's that's right steven that's the point that
with the 16 000 cases they need different bits of evidence and what the lawyers need to know is
there are people on this call and and jeff pilatt is another example dr claire craig there are
excellent data analysts who can help lawyers understand the relevance of the numbers that's
what they need you elbert your job our job is to be aware of it so we can share with lawyers but
your job is to tell the lawyers tell warner give send warner an email and he'll spread the message
amongst his covert lawyer network but probably i don't think i don't think albert is possibly the
best person to decide what the lawyers want he he doesn't know no no that's that's albert makes
himself available the lawyers then go what i need is this piece of evidence well the way we can help
then is people like you charles the legal advisor can tell the lawyers you need to listen to albert
because although he may miss the mark um you know uh 20 times on the 21st time he hits something
that the lawyers want to know about and sasha has offered her the services and jeff pilatt has
offered so and elbert's skills are different to sasha and and you're steven you're quite right
it's literally it's literally finding that smoking gun that's what elbert's talking about that's what
we're always talking about remember the tobacco case everybody said i've always said i'm waiting
for people to catch up i've i've always i've said it i've said it a few times that i have a thousand
answers to a thousand questions that have not been asked yet but when i give the answer ahead of the
question people are scratching their head going huh what do you what do you mean you you don't say
what are you start talking about so it's like i i feel like a caged eagle i really do like i'm
waiting for people to catch up and go ah i get it now yeah but you know that's just me good
but that's my point you have to i'm happy to help you articulate your offering to the legal
fraternity globally okay thank you because the danger is that um the danger is that the lawyers
dismiss albert because um maybe it's the hat not because it's not competent but because you know
what lawyers are like they want to go on to the next thing no no one just put a tie on i'll put
a suit and tie on when when i'm going to do it it's time yes no look steven steven that's that's the
articulation of albert's offering to the legal lawyers steven and then the the lawyers have to be
provoked so that when they come back to elbert what have you got elbert your your answer elbert
is not i made this mistake in my in my speaking career everybody i'm a i'm a professional speaker
and an executive coach after i stopped being a lawyer and people would say like just imagine this
because this is medical doctors you go to the doctor and the first thing the doctor says
let me go through my qualifications let me go through my experience let me go through my
philosophy no the patient couldn't give for rats the doctor the wise doctor steven as you know says
elbert you know sorry to the patient what's up the doctor doesn't talk about his qualifications
similarly elbert when somebody says to you how can you help your answer is never don't go blah
your answer is what do you need that's the point because steven says you've got a you've got a
thousand answers to a thousand questions but the lawyers have to articulate in these 16,000 cases
what crucial piece of evidence can you dig out and then appear in court to support that because
that's the other thing that lawyers need not just information but your ability to be an expert
witness but um so albert we're listening to your last presentation that was um extremely interesting
from a lawyer's point of view because you are turning up all kinds of um evidence of uh
concealment of crime in my view in the present context
thank you albert yep absolutely and albert the question is how can someone get hold of you for
an interview albert's email address is in the in the chat he's put that yeah in there so save the
chat everybody um and steven good point all right so that's what we're going to do with albert we
will articulate and we'll get it to the lawyers running cases all around the world and we've got
the legal group steven that that you have started to uh to you know that you've started so i've got
a lot of lawyers we can send that to albert next question anyone got a question or a problem we've
got another 10 minutes excellent we don't have to keep going um yes your hands are good i wonder
if gail mccrae is still on the call if she could um give a little commercial on her efforts legal
efforts um i will check gail mccrae is a uh nurse who was fired she's not here no she's not here
oh all right but rima rima what you could do quite frankly is come back to stop the who
we just come back to your strategic thinking on this issue of every people in every country
understanding the threat that is who and now the money pox game that's coming along and i've seen
some pretty horrific emails in the last week that you know that who is already wanting to claim
sovereignty over each of our countries yes could you just give us a did you just articulate what
that threat is as you presently see it with what they're trying to do with their regulations
dreamer i've tried to email you a few times asking you whether you'd like to
present to us but i think you might be a bit behind with your emails um
um and um so i was just going to ask you now but you don't need to answer if you don't want to
if you'd like to present to us next sunday then there's a free slot then yes i'd be very happy to
oh very nice of you um which email address do you use dreamer um i'll give you the uh yes
you can maybe write to me um because i i think i may have the wrong email address for you
uh you asked me to present and i wrote to you and said yes i'd love to and uh didn't hear back so
it's probable i mean it's i think i did reply to that one i remember you saying that yeah i think
i replied to you but um oh exactly i'm sorry if i missed it but i don't i think i saw that one where
you said yes i'd love but i think reema you saw the email late that could be yes could be so
i mentioned one one last thing i see a question i see a question in the past a few times but it
was a it was a question about um ethnicity in the bears data and um how do we get that or
is it is it in there in this and the question is the answer is um no it's not it's not published
to the public the the um ethnic or ethnicity data um however i i went back to my video because i
wasn't sure if i filled that if that question asked you know what's your nationality or whatever
however they call it and it is there i saw it i have proof that that it is there on my on my video
that that's one of the questions they ask you know you know white black hispanic all that stuff
but yet they don't they don't publish that on the on the bears data so um i guess the question is
how do we get it i have no idea but it's not it's not in the published bears data at all but that
would be pretty interesting to okay so the question is the question is asked but it's not published
it's not published yeah all right uh jim's got his hand up so albert if they ask a question if
they have an ask a question and they get an answer are they required to publish it
i don't think they're required to do anything i mean i don't know i really don't know
but albert the original idea behind bears was there any requirement or were they just set up
with loads of money from the state and yeah i mean i first of all i i thought i read
somewhere before or heard somewhere before that the original original although i'm reading what
i read in the national vaccine information center by by the founder herself barbara lo fischer
says that she was a part of the very beginning 1986 prep fact but i thought that that bears
wasn't like the initial wasn't initially in there that it had to come later that she her and people
like her had to claw and kick and scream to actually get them to to to go okay a part of this
prep act we're going to um publish the the adverse events but even then reading the history on that
it didn't it didn't come out i mean they just they just regurgitated a bunch of a bunch of code a
bunch of data and it took a it took many years before stephen rubin came along and actually
created meta alerts that made it um and it wasn't until after he created meta alerts that cdc created
the wonder system to make it more somewhat user-friendly okay so why don't you employ the
the tactic which surya told us about that he starts off when he's blind or or doesn't know
what the answer is he asks them what are your protocols or whatever it was he said um and that
way you could so you could write to them on an foia or get surya to write them even better and
um and nail them on what they're required to do and then you you go back at them and say well why
haven't you done this and why haven't you done that and and stephen sue frost has put in there
that she's digging out the law from congress library on this issue so there's chatting there
so stepping absolutely on the right side with that albert's helping me with that yeah one of one of
the rules that's that's clearly written in the um the uh sops and the sops standard operating
procedures there that i've seen myself um it says uh like one of the things that stood out is that
the the physician or health care worker or hospital is obligated to file a bears report
if the patient goes moves from transitions from emergency to inpatient hospital so they get admitted
they're obligated right there at that point to file a bears report but that's great in the standard
operating procedure but i saw firsthand with my uncle that nobody in the hospital asked
what was it were you involved you know what was your vax history it's like they they don't ask
the question so that they don't have to know because if they do know then they'll be obligated
to file a report so then therefore they don't ask and then you know uh electronic medical records
like epic that has the university hospital market cornered you know it doesn't even set it up in
their system to you know to these are all just followers right you know they just plug in whatever
is there but you know so so it's not even that's not a that's not a failure of of theirs or the
cdc that's a failure that's an ethical failure that's a a doctor failing to get a proper history
from his patient or her patient yeah that's not not something that should concern you because um
you're concerned with what what bears as i understand it with what with what bears does with
the information provided to them and what are the requirements at the moment it seems that we don't
have any idea what they're required to do which is a not very good is it we need to find out what
they're going to find out okay we've got two we've got one hand up and then we're going to finish in
three minutes so and then we can go back to tom rodman has put the telegram video on this is a
two and a half hour session um and jim put your hand up rima i will email you i think it's dr rima
that one that email address yes yes i'm going to put both my emails in the chat and invite anyone
to use both on any email thank you so much thank you and and then look at the kill at the kill who
strategy jim thank you very much great presentation thank you jim the uh issue of racial specificity is
a very important topic and it's being anything that's being hidden we cdc knows is important
fda knows is important anything that's left off the database is very important and that's where
you come in to figure out what is left off the data database what they're hiding and specifically
not just race but ace 2 receptor the ace 2 receptor is the entry site for how they get into that how
it gets into the back into the cells and that ace 2 is racially specific and so if we can get that
data we can show that maybe some people are okay to take this vaccine virus spike protein whereas
some people are not and that's going to be the critical issue of this and that may tie everything
together in terms of the of the world economic forum plow swab and everybody into it maybe
that's safe for them maybe it's not safe for others and that's the secret to the data the other the
issue is yes um your you now have people who are looking for this who are actively being sued
peter macula some of these other people are being actively sued and those people not only can use
voia requests but they also have discovery requests they can use so you may be able to
tell them how you and uh and uh the guy who spoke before may be able to hone their requests in on to
use their discovery stuff and act as expert witness because if you can find things that they
that they don't turn over then you get paid under some kind of good your verse agar case
where but for them not being honest they had to employ you so you get uh paid and and i think
steven frost and uh and charles went over that pretty well with you um great job thank you very
much that race data you can get any of that race data that would be really critical and i need it
next two days thanks well done well done jim all right everybody we're gonna go
tom rodman has put the link in there two and a half hours
elbert well done on your digging and well done on your passion we love passionate people steven
is passionate um steven anything you want to say before we formally end well thank you to um
to you um uh albert and uh and to your accomplices and um and uh
reema i will send an email to you if you could look out for your emails that would be good
or mine so thank you so much thank you very much everybody for showing up thank you so much it was
an honor surreal well done albert thank you big thank you with where we do the thank you's everybody
see you on tuesday night wednesday tuesday afternoon tuesday night wednesday morning have a
wonderful sunday monday save the chat save the chat get over save the chat yes save the chat and
get over to the telegram chat if you've got time to keep talking well done albert thank you thank
you dr waters yeah well done jerry for your support there thank you albert god bless thank you
thank you