So Jane, so the process of what Stephen is obviously having come on again, log on problems.
So the way that we run this is you speak for, so there's a whole group now, lots of speakers,
we're interested in your state of thinking now or whatever you would like to speak about
in what your thinking is. You can speak for 10 minutes and then we're great at asking questions,
I moderate the questions, or you can speak for half an hour and share your thinking,
insights, where to now, how are we going to fight government overage, how are we going to
fight for freedom, how are we going to get doctors being able to practice their profession. Does that
make sense? Of course it does. Hang on, I'm talking to Jane. Thank you Charles. That's a very broad,
uh, you know, a charge of course, and there are so many learned and experienced people. I recognize
a lot of names even though I haven't met some of you directly. So I, you know, it's a challenge
to kind of pull my thinking together for such a very broadly edified group, shall we say.
But I like to start at the beginning of certain elements and maybe that'll help. And I'm,
to get back to your original point and question, I'm happy to speak for about 10 minutes. I don't
want to put anyone to sleep and I like to take questions. So I'd rather go that route and give
you time. If you, I'll try to look for like 10, 10 minutes ish, and then I'll stop myself.
Feel free to wave if I go a little bit over and then, um, and I'm happy to take any questions
that, you know, that we have time for on your, this is your conference. So the reason I like,
when I say I like to start at the beginning, I like to be very clear about one thing.
And I'll be clear about other things as well, but this is not a vaccine.
And to that end, you all must contribute as experts to stop calling it that. Why is that
important? If somebody walks into a bank with a gun and demands the money, they've committed
bank robbery. If you call it requesting a loan, you get very different reactions to it, don't you?
And you get a difference in culpability with the law. So you, you are leaders and day after day
after day, I still hear, I still hear my frontline colleagues. I won't name them to irritate them
because I've said it to them, to their faces, stop calling it a vaccine.
You're using the words of the criminals. They're getting away with this partly because they're
under the umbrella of a vaccine. These are not vaccines. As many of you know,
vaccines confer the promise of future protection and better health. These do none of this, none of
that. In fact, they create disease. They turn your body into a perpetual bio weapon manufacturing
organism. Now we're going to have problems for years to come. For those of you who don't know me,
I'm a medical professional. I'm a licensed nurse practitioner. I took all my, my, um,
residencies in the medical school at the university of Rochester in New York state.
Uh, I treated patients in, uh, uh, ICUs and acute care settings. And then I went on to, uh,
to run an external research lab. I did, I ran a lot of phase one, two, and three studies
for pharmaceutical companies all over the world. And then I got recruited up into the industry and
I spent 20 years inside the industry. It's a filthy, dirty place. In the second half of my
20 year tenure, I started to whistle blow internally. I started to call attention
to a lot of the crimes and finally I got out. So I don't know who's at the top or what's at the top
of this food chain, but we're definitely on somebody's timeline that we don't even know about.
I don't know about your countries, but I'm very concerned that my military is being decimated day
by day to prevent a flu with a 99% recovery rate. And I'm pissed off about it.
Right. So let's start using the language of the criminals. This is a bio weapon. This was
began by my own government, my own country, many people in it. You all know the names and the people,
but it's a, it's an international criminal conspiracy. And if you haven't had Dr. David
Martin in your group to speak, then you have not been completely edified because that person did
20 years of research on the receipts, on the patents, on the information.
So I don't want to get too political about it, but that's my starting point to stop calling it a
vaccine. Let's start using the right terminology. Let's face the fact that we are involved in a,
an international worldwide global criminal conspiracy, and they're not going to stop.
Okay. And as we go along, we're going to see many of our peers become compromised. And I want you to
keep your antenna up for that. People who continue to call it a vaccine, people who push some of them
now as, Oh, maybe they're a little bit safer. Maybe they're safer for elderly, but not children.
Maybe we can ditch the injections and we can go to the pills.
Smell new peer of year, Pfizer's packs. Livid.
These are, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to be a regular scientist or expert like yourselves
to figure out that the mechanism of action is to explode cancer development.
So we're, we're on a long path. If we don't try to shut this down,
unfortunately, and I'll speak for my own country, any, you know, alone,
um, most, most of our legislators are gone. They're, they're compromised.
How do I know that? Because they're quiet. Because someone like Anthony Fauci can go into Congress,
testify three times and lie when we have the documentation to prove his lies. And instead
of going to jail or being tried for it, he's, he's out there telling us today on mainstream media that
we better get ready for more lockdowns because the, the sub unit of the sub unit of the variant
of the, you know, we, there is no, I tell people there is no validated diagnostic test
for any of this. Nothing is specific and nothing's been validated for validity
and reliability. And those of you who do research understand what that means.
So, I mean, the CDC itself, this criminal organization, that's a patent holding company
with 4,000 patents paid for by RTX dollars, recalled it because they knew they couldn't
overcome it, but yet they said you could use it till the end of the year. I mean, if you got your
car manufacturer telling you, Hey, take away, listen, your, your engine could explode at any moment,
but you can use it till December 31st of this year. You'd think they were out of their minds.
Well, that's what they did with the PCR test. So why do we keep responding?
Like, you know, like knee jerk reaction to getting tested and cases, cases, cases,
all these new fancy words, variant from mutation. I don't want to get into the whole virology thing.
That's not my, my ball of wax, but it's, it's, it's all a joke and, and people are getting ready to,
to knuckle down again, to bend down, to knee down again to this. We've got to do a lot of teaching
of the public. We're doing great. We've made a lot of strides. So that's one thing that's really,
really important. People need to understand that this is not an organic spike protein.
I mean, I haven't seen any proof that anyone has isolated a SARS-CoV-2 organism in its whole form
from an ill individual. So how can we validate tests against it? How do we even talk, begin to
talk without being laughed at about variants, right? Viruses generally burn down, not up as
they go through a population. But the point is nobody has proof of any variant. I've asked some
of the biggest frontline doctors, really, you want to talk about variants? How do you diagnose a
variant? Oh, sequencing. Oh, okay. Sequencing to look at a chunk of something that's made out of
basic building blocks that could really, really be a part of anything. Right? So there's a lot of
layers, layers, layers of deception, of lies, of corruption. And the only way out of this,
as I, as I alluded to, is ourselves, the people, educating the people. Because I don't know about
your countries, but in my country, not only do we not have Congress, we have a few, I, this is how
Stephen and I got into a discussion. We have a few dog and pony shows, but until I see an indictment,
a criminal indictment, and a trial in a legitimate court, not a simulation over in Germany,
nothing's happening. Nothing's, and I've tussled with my own senators. It all leads to a donate
button. And until you do something concrete and start to hold people accountable in this criminal
conspiracy, you're part of it. Our institutions have collapsed. It's a very grim time in the
United States. I had four grandparents who came to this country at the turn of the century legally,
and they loved their country of origin. But they told me when I was five years old, get down and
kiss this ground, because there is no place like this. And I never thought I'd have to fight for it
on my charge in my generation this soon. But our institutions have collapsed. We have no DOJ,
Department of Justice. We have no Federal Bureau of Investigation, the FBI. We have no FDA.
It's a department advisor right now. So we don't have these formerly trusted institutions that we
can trust. And another thing I wanted to let all of you know, I was asked last year to work with a
couple of different legal groups that work nationally and internationally. I was asked to
prepare an affidavit, a sworn affidavit, because I've written original protocols in pharma. I've
written 25 page informed consent documents and had to defend them with an institutional review
board. Right. So I, it's important, you know, to me, it's important to understand when what the
crux of my affidavit was and is, it's still out there. It's been filed in two federal courts,
and I don't know where else is that all of these authorizations are illegal. And the subsequent
approvals are ill. We got to keep it real simple for the public. We got to get them on board to
think these are illegal authorizations. There's no, they're illegal because why, if you understand
the phases of human drug research, to bring an entity to the pharmacy shelf, you will immediately
recognize just by reading Pfizer's protocol in clinical trials.gov, the title alone gives away
the crime. A phase one slash two slash three. For those of you who are in clinical research,
you understand those phases. You can't do them simultaneously. Why? Because each one is safety
finding, dose finding, pharmacokinetics. Each, the results of each one informs the design of the
subsequent study. And they're trying to show us that they're doing them all at once. To me,
that's a crime. These are illegal authorizations. We don't have to go any further than that.
Because they have, the FDA violated their own federal regulations, their own guidance documents,
of which there are thousands on their website, which are what's required, minimum requirements
to run trials for safety and efficacy has been bastardized. Those two terms have been bastardized.
Because you have thresholds for data. Certain types of studies can only feed that data,
and certain types of data from certain designs are allowed to be configured into what constitutes
safety and efficacy. And these people, I mean, it's right there in front of you, the crime.
They broke the blind. Why? They broke the blind so that they didn't have a placebo comparator.
So your signals get murky, and you can claim safety and efficacy illegally, I might add.
Right? There's been a lot of shenanigans, a lot of criminal pieces to this. So that's sort of where
my thinking is in terms of trying to get, you know, like Dr. Martin says, and he's a mentor,
a friend, I've been with him from the beginning. It's not just him. There are a lot of other great
people like him, but he really stands out to me because he's fearless, and he's a good person.
He's fearless. He's looked at the patents. He knows what's coming. He's brought out a lot of
crimes across this whole criminal conspiracy. He's outlined the federal laws of the United States
that have been broken, the privateers, the criminals in the conspiracy. There are many,
many more than just the famous ones we all like to bash. So I think if we keep it simple, we need
to get, you know, we can't get in the weeds with each other on going down rabbit holes of, you know,
this variant and the sub two and this and that. And I mean, it's going to go nowhere while they're
going to continue to try to perpetuate the fear, the compliance. And as Dr. Kevin Stillwagon says,
one of my favorite lines is, you know, the food of tyrants is compliance. Let's stop feeding them.
So I'm happy to take questions. I know some of you have seen me. I started out on the Stu
Peter show as his medical contributor last year. A lot of great reception. Our worldwide viewership
is up to 10 million now for the entire platform. So he invited me to start my own show and we
launched it in February. It's the Dr. Jane Ruby show and it sits within StuPetersTV.com.
If you've seen anything, if you have any questions or if you have any questions about what I've
shared today, I never limit questions. If I don't know something, I'll tell you.
And I'm happy to take any questions you have. And again, if I don't say it before people
leave or do other things, I really want to thank you for the invitation today to be with you.
Wonderful, Jane. Jane, thank you very much. Well done on your short exposé of your current
thinking. That's what we're interested in because we've all been on this journey, as Adnan started
saying. We've been on a two-year journey. Everyone on this call, almost everyone has been on this
two-year journey. Everyone, please write that down. The food of tyrants is compliance. Now,
put your hand up. We've got a process here, Jane, where people put their hand up. We handle them
in order. The chat we will send to you or you can save the chat yourself because there's some great
links in the chat that I would recommend. Wonderful. Thank you. It's well worth saving.
Now, we, how much time have we got you for? It's 5.20 where I am. I am good until the top of the
hour. So 40 if you want me that long. We have no troubles asking you questions for two hours.
In terms of my moderation, now everybody, please, I need your cooperation today because
I don't know what's happened to Stephen. He hasn't run me. We haven't got an official host
yet, so I can't control any of you. I need you to control yourselves. I can't mute anybody,
but this is being recorded. Jane, what we do is we make the recording available to people here.
It's being recorded now and then this becomes valuable to share with others. Just for your
information, the speakers that we've had over the last few weeks are Paul Marrick last week,
Jessica Rose, Craig Pardacupa on the batch issues. I hope you get him on your show.
I've been working with them since the beginning. Team Enigma. Yes.
Wonderful. Peter McCulloch, Ivan Sinchich, the member of the European Parliament,
David Martin we had on the 28th of February. Wonderful. Before that, we had Steve Kirsch,
Anna de Buissere on legal matters, Steve Forsyth, Phil Ex-Royal Marine, Phil Hyland,
Andrew Kaufman we had on exploring that question of the isolation. We can ask you questions for
two hours. Everybody keep them tight. I'm sure, Jane, it's great to have you here. Well done on
your journey and for you speaking your truth. I think everybody, we've heard often the truth
will come out as it did with Hunter Biden's laptop last night on Sky News. New York Times
on the paragraph 24, they said, they acknowledged that yes, it wasn't Russian disinformation on Hunter
Biden's laptop. Miranda Devine wrote that excellent book, The Laptop from Hell. I recommend it.
More and more evidence comes out, as you all know, in terms of the corruption that went on in the
November 20 election. But that was yesterday that that acknowledgement came out and still the 51
signatories from the CIA say, oh no, it's still Russian disinformation. Jane, you're quite right.
The institutions have been captured. Who do you trust? The answer is, we've said it many times on
this group, it's up to us and it's up to us leading the people to push back. So Jane, thank
you. Our first question, first hand up is Liam Sturgis. Liam, I think you're from Canada. By the
way, we've got people here from all around the world, Jane, as you would probably guess. And
I'm from Australia, the lockdown capital of the world, Melbourne, not Melbourne, Florida. Liam,
over to you. Yes, thanks, Charles. Yeah, I'm, hi, Dr. Jane. I'm Liam. I'm from Vancouver, Canada.
I've been watching you on the Stu Peter show and now your own show for probably about eight months
now. So thank you for everything you've done. Thank you. And I'm happy to that you brought up
the fact that Fauci and others are already telegraphing the return of the lockdowns and
the mandates due to the next variant. The same thing's happening here in Canada. So you can kind
of see the narrative being respawned. So my question for you is have you looked into,
and forgive me, maybe you have spoken about this, but the genetic aspects of the spike protein and
how preliminary research suggests a spectrum of susceptibility to illness with at the very bottom,
there's a gene that seems to appear in a specific genealogy of the Ashkenazi Jewish population.
And then you go all the way to the other end and you have South Asian and European folks who,
it's all based on the ACE2 receptor and the genetic variations in it. And of course, add the
fact that vitamin D deficiency is a comorbidity for severe COVID. And that happens to affect Black
people disproportionately. Combine that with the new Ukrainian bio lab, the allegations that perhaps
they were developing viral weapons. Can I ask you to just clarify, what is your,
I get all that background, what is your question for me? Yeah, what do you say to that? Have you
looked into that or do you have anything you can contribute beyond any of that background?
You want my honest opinion? It's navel gazing. We don't have time. I don't know how to impress
upon people. We don't have time to dig into those nice little luxurious scientific weeds.
This is a chimeric molecule that was developed in silico. It travels to every cell in your body
because it's in a lipid nano particle at that level, right? The atomic level. And depending on
where it lands, and I don't even know what else it's programmed for. If you look at the leaked
documents between Pfizer and the EMA, they're talking about the EMA is asking them, you have 50%
of this material that is unaccounted for. What else is in there? And they say, we need that leeway.
Well, since then, they've discovered that there are partial RNA strands. God knows programmed for
what. If you get into those kinds of weeds, no disrespect intended, you're going to get,
these are red herrings. We don't have time to focus on. People are dying. Children are being attacked
right now, five to 11 years old in my country, which is my hill that I die on, much less the
six month olds to four. Are you out of your minds? So to me, I don't have the luxury to look at,
you know, different cultural, you know, emphasis things. I don't even know what they're doing.
These companies, you should be very frightened that these companies are silent. I worked in this
industry for 20 years. If you farted the wrong way in the company, they came out with a press release.
They came out with a correction. They were so petrified of their image. Have you ever seen a
cutthroat in industry like this one silence together? You don't have any other companies
saying, Hey, how did they get away with, you know, an interim analysis for a full blown approval?
And I had to go the 15 years and $500 million. You ever wonder how, how does that happen? That
they're all silent. There's something very bad happening. We're on somebody's timetable and I
don't know who it is. Okay. And so we don't have a lot of time left. A lot of people have been shot
up with this stuff. We don't even know what the long-term effects are going to be. They may become
different types of people emotionally. They, if they make it, if they live, and I'm sorry to scare
people, but so far it's irreversible. I put myself out on a limb a little bit because I'm asking an
obvious question that no one seems to want to ask Dr. Malone, who's very proud of the fact that he
invented it. Why aren't you in the lab day and night working on the antidote to this thing that
is killing babies and children and teens, taking down elite athletes and devastating my military?
So I don't know what the answers are to those questions, but all I know, Liam, is we don't have
a lot of time and we need to get to as many people as possible. We need to tell them if you've taken
it, don't take any more. If you've taken the two shots, don't take the any boosters. We're seeing
a rapid explosion in all kinds of cancers. And here's, here's where it's the perfect crime.
It's in Dr. McCullough wisely pointed out four buckets months ago. I have to see if I can get
them right. Hematological, neurological, immunological, and cardiac. In those buckets,
you're going to see so many different illnesses that it's going to be very confusing for people
to tie it back. Hell, they can't even tie it back when they die two days after their second Pfizer
shot. The families couldn't have been the shot. How are they going to do it six months or a year
from now or two years from now? It's the perfect crime. It's the perfect murder design and they're
still making more and they're going to make more types. And Pfizer just entered an agreement with
acutis therapeutics. I don't know if you know this to make 10 new mRNA based vaccines and therapeutics.
So even though this thing is killing people, right? They're making more for more diseases.
Is it for the diseases they're creating? I don't know. Let's see what happens. So we've got to stop
people from mindlessly taking these things, got to get them out of the fear. And we're going to come
up upon a real challenge because they're about to drop another fear thing for us in the United
States. I believe it's because the election is in November. They have to do it around June or July,
mark my words, because they need that kind of time to lock in, get people locked down and lock
them in with mail-in ballots because that's how they can commit fraud on the election. If they do
it in August or September, it's too late, too late for the voting fraud. So my prediction is
it'll probably try, they're ginning up now. They may even tweak something and drop it because
then people do start to get sick for a few months. I know because I'm working with Dr. Eric Henson,
attorney Tom Renz, if you know these people, and Stu to rescue them out of the hospitals.
And also for those who have not gotten to the hospital as soon as they get sick,
because I do think there is a bio weapon organism that they kind of seed. I'm just saying it just
makes sense. You talk about Delta and then last summer, June, July and August, people get sick.
Then there's a lull. Then you talk about Omicron and then people get sick October,
November, December. Now there's a lull. I mean, hello, your scientists looks a little logical to
me, but we'll see. We'll see if the prediction of the patterning that I'm predicting happens.
I think it's predominantly because of our election coming up.
Diane, thank you for that. Lee, thank you for the question. We now have James Winkle.
Yes,
Stephen is on the phone James. Before you go, Stephen apparently has joined us. Thank goodness.
So he's okay. So, so sorry, Jane. I will explain later.
Hi, Stephen. Good enough. They've recorded it so you can hear my ranting later.
Who's recorded it? I was wondering about that.
Stephen knows I'm a rancher. Stephen knows I'm a rancher.
It was very good. Stephen, can you make me a co-host please while you're sitting organized?
And so I can get this mob under control for Jane. And we've got James another 26 minutes,
Stephen. So James, James Winkle over to you. Yeah. Yeah. Thanks, Jane, for the talk. And I
just want to, I guess, we're currently working on a trial for these vaccine injuries. And one of our
PhDs is in nanotechnology. So I can confirm what she's saying. I don't know if most people know,
but the bio-distribution studies of this slip of nanoparticle, I think that only did two days,
even though it accumulates far, far, far after that, at least according to the doctor I'm working
with. But despite all that, I had a question since I'm in the in-between states right now. I just
moved out of Illinois. There are a lot of doctors I speak with that have been either fired or
in the process of just these universities, bullying them into submission, and they feel that
they're just alone, I guess. So how would you recommend like uniting or playing more offense,
I guess, to help some of these physicians, I'm sure, are afraid to speak up with anyone?
Yeah. Thank you, James. Thanks for the question. And keep up the good work on your end.
The doctors and nurses and many, many of the general public got so dependent on these big
hospital systems that, and unfortunately, a lot of the doctors just became like salaried people,
just like nurses, and they lost their ability to really develop the art of medicine.
I'll say that much. What I've been talking about for the last year is I could see this coming.
And I've said to people, you know, you can repurpose your skills when you
step out of that hospital, or that corporation or that whatever, you don't cease to be
a carpenter or a nurse or a physician or whatever you are, you are that those skills. And so
you can take those. What I would suggest, James, and your question is really well founded,
is to start where you are. Start very locally. That's really where you have the majority of your
own power. Find alliances in your family, then you go out. Alliances in your neighborhood,
your community, and just put together. You don't have to have 5,000 people at first. Just start
with a few like-minded people, maybe with those same skills, and try to create a parallel service
where you can use skills. Yeah. Are we going to take a hit in some of our salaries? Yeah. We're
not going to have the cushy corporate salary. I know what that's like. I walked away from big,
big money pharma. So I understand that you have to really make a gross adjustment. It's a shock to
the system. But if we're ever going to get to the other side of this, we're going, people are going
to need your skills, all of our skills. So we have to really think differently about it. And I think
that's the way to go about it. I will say that anyone who, and I've been on a rant lately about
this, when people who now stay in these systems, I don't care what the excuse is, you are complicit
in the conspiracy to commit murder, domestic terrorism on the people of the United States,
and conspiracy to commit murder in general. And that goes for any country. But I speak for my
own country first, because here's where I'm licensed, and here's where I've taught nursing,
and nursing ethics, and things like that. So I wanted to wrap that up for you. So I'm not too
long winded, and I get other people's questions in. But thank you for that.
Thank you. Thanks. Yes, thank you.
You're welcome. Thank you. Thanks. Ariana, who, Dr. Love we have here. Dr. Ruby and Dr. Love.
It's a big day.
Now we have Dr. Six. Ariana.
It's a big day. Nice to meet you.
Nice to meet you, Dr. Ruby. Sorry, I'm in the dark. I'm a little bit sick too. I got,
I got, you know, in Finland, we have that people are double jabbed now and boosted.
And the transmission is really intense. So I'm planning on leaving because I just can't.
Yeah, I got hit with transmission. That was around a couple people who for about an hour,
not by, you know, by necessity. So I'm like really having a difficult time detoxifying this time. So
for the entire year, it was okay. Anyway, anyway, I wanted to ask you, and I wanted to thank you
for that very powerful rant. And this is exactly what people here need to hear. We all need to
hear that. I wanted to ask you about this. Dr. Frank Zalewski. You know, remember when he held
up that string and he was talking about these transgenic hydras and he held up the string and
he showed that how long they will grow inside the body. I wanted to ask, do you think that that has
something to do with these white stringy, you know, long stringy things that they're pulling out of
veins? Yeah, thanks for the question. And again, you know, good to see you. I know you've been on
Stu's show a lot and it's nice to see, you know, see you live and talk to you live.
What you're referring to, first of all, the embalmer report, which I was the first one to break.
And I say that because, you know, he went to a lot of other people and they just didn't respond to
him. So I look, this is Mr. Richard Hirschman. Maybe some of you have heard of him. He was on
my show a couple of times and he's been on other shows a little bit. He started, he said, I want
to come forward. I've been seeing these white fibrous clots. They appear to be emanating out
of a bloody end, like they're feeding off of it. Very strange. And we met with Dr. Bhakdi and Dr.
Thomas, just blanking. Sorry, sorry. The cardiologist, the German card. Yes. Can you
hear me? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Anyway, anyway, the cardiologist said, interestingly, it's hard to
believe someone could live with that in their body, that it must have happened post-mortem.
And Mr. Hirschman said, I don't believe so. Respectfully disagree because I have people
hours later, the body's still warm and they, I'm pulling these out. What we, what, what, what,
I don't know if it's connected Dr. Love, but I will say this. What concerned me is that, you know,
Dr. Zalewski, if any of you haven't seen the video, it's, it's, it's a lengthy one and it's
actually fascinating. And he's, he's not a moron. He's not some fly by name. He's really an
interesting guy and an educated guy. But what bothered me is we didn't hear from him again.
Like he should have been on the talk show circuit, at least among internet stuff. And I, I just, I,
I don't mean to suggest anything. I just wish that we would have seen more replication, more of his
work, you know, that kind of thing. And yet it's, he's kind of gone silent. I don't know if anyone
has a chance to get to him or find him. It wouldn't be a bad idea to do so. Is there a connection?
We don't know. And I'll tell you this, what we won't know until we get a chemical analysis of
what this white material is now, Dr. Mr. Hirschman and other embalmers that I've talked to that
haven't come forward yet have all said the same thing. Look, we've seen hundreds of types of
clots white, you know, red, bloody partial, whatever, but we've never seen this thing.
They felt it, the consistency that the break, the way it handles, they've never seen that before
middle of the year, 2021. So it really coincides with the shots. And so I encouraged Mr. Hirschman,
he tells me he's in the process. It's not an easy thing to do because you need to have good chain of
custody established. You have to have, I said to him, I would encourage you to oversee your own
samples, go, you know, fly there wherever you, when you find, and you, he should pick the lab,
we shouldn't all pick it. So I'm waiting, he's in the process. He's made some steps forward on that.
And we'll see once we get that chemical composition, I think that's going to tell us,
I wouldn't say everything that's that's too much, but it'll tell us a lot. Remember,
we're feeling our way like this through the dark. These companies, as I said earlier, are silent,
eerily silent, no defensive pressers, press releases, nothing. They're just silent. So
they're not disclosing, they know everything. They knew who got what, they're measuring it.
They know what's going to happen next. They know what's going to happen to who team enigma,
Craig Pardicooper and Sasha lot of POVA to that I work with the most, you know, brilliant, brilliant
work. They, they, they shot us light years ahead in this mystery. And we're not where we need to be
yet, but they really blew the door open on looking at the rates of death and destruction per lot
number, and then finding out the hacking of the Moderna and Pfizer websites, finding out that those,
that those lot numbers are authentic and that there could be up to 1.5 million doses per lot
number. So they're all out there still circulating the deadly ones and in the deadly ones, you know,
you don't know on any given day, the deadly ones could become different, right? Because these
companies are running the tables. I've said Russian roulette, it's interesting Russian roulette,
at least with regular Russian roulette, you're going to get one of two things air or a bullet
to your head. With this, you have you have hundreds of chambers. So you don't know what
you're getting on any given day, in any time point. So that lot number from a year ago,
which is still circulating, could have totally different things in it. There's no oversight
on anything. It's frightening. Thank you, Jane. And Ryan Cole is here, Ariana. So Ryan put a
note in the chat. He's done some analysis. Ryan, have you got a moment to come on and just
speak about what you just put in your analysis of what's in these bodies?
Hopefully you can hear me. I'm at the grocery store.
Yeah, they're they're abnormal. Certainly, they're extra cellular. Normally a clot has
platelets and fibrin and is usually pretty a cellular. These ones, interestingly, are very
cellular because of the amount of white blood cells that are trapped within them and then the
protein itself. If one really wants to examine what's happening here, you need to look at the
papers of Dr. Pretorius out of South Africa. Dr. Pretorius did some fantastic work. So if you take
plasma and you take the platelets out of it and just put spike protein in with plasma,
you end up with the spike protein in and of itself inducing aggregation of thrombin,
plasmid, and causing clots without platelets. So it causes kind of an amyloid-esque protein clumping.
So the spike is triggering it. So we know, you know, at this point, the shots are more dangerous
than the virus itself because omicron doesn't tend to split with a fear and cleavage into an S1 and
S2 and the S1 is the more inflammatory clotting aspect of the spike. So interestingly, just with
the spike in these shots, we're inducing a protein clumping and then this tends to trap the white
blood cells. It's a lot of neutrophils. It's a lot of eosinophils and then I mark these with
the immunohistochemical markers that show an increase of surface adhesion molecules,
intercellular adhesion molecules. So they're all sticking to each other like mad.
So I've got a few more studies to do on them. I'm going to look for the presence of spike protein
with within the clot proper, which I'm pretty sure I'm going to find. And so that's what we know
so far to date, but the papers of Dr. Pretorius are a good place to start and we'll go from there
and see what else we find. Over. Beautiful. Thank you. Thank you, Ryan. Wonderful,
wonderful addition to that question. Now, our next question, because I know we've got you
for another 14 minutes, James. So we've got iPhone here. Strange name. Who are you, iPhone?
I can't remember. Look it is.
Charles, is that possibly me, Mark Sexton? I think I came up as iPhone before. I do apologize.
I thought I've seen that head before and Stephen has as well. Yes, Mark Sexton, Jane, is a
former police officer in the UK. Mark, over to you.
Thank you very much, Charles. Dr. Ruby, it's really nice to meet you. Good evening, everybody else.
Hi, Dr. Stephen Frost. Dr. Ruby, it's a straightforward question. As a former policeman,
I've been involved in a lot of criminal applications here in the UK.
Senator Ron Johnson is doing a lot of work in the United States and he's having
a lot of experts on there giving really damning, irrefutable and vast amount of evidence against
this evil agenda. Is anything at all coming from it? Well, thanks for the question, Mark. And
of course, you know, I'm always admiring police officer service, so I'm sure you've saved a lot
of lives. I'm not in Senator Ron Johnson's inner circle. He certainly has taken this further than
any of our other legislators. But you know, I insist on holding our legislators to the very
highest standards. They're elected officials, they should answer to us. I know theoretically,
but in reality, that doesn't always happen. I understand that they do have limitations,
but nobody's more powerful than them. And so what I could say to you is I'm still waiting.
I'm looking forward to anything that he moves the needle on this. I would be very grateful to see it.
He had a lot of standard people. He had only had one woman. I'm sorry to, you know, make it a gender
issue, but I noticed things. You know, we have a lot of brilliant women scientists that are in the
front lines right now. Many of them are probably in this, this, this zoom tonight. But, but my point
is I looked for a lot of other people. And I think that there's a lot of voices. Some are recycled
over and over and over again every day. And those are the ones you just want to be careful. You want
to keep having different voices. That's what keeps the discussion healthy and vibrant and new ideas.
And it prevents flipping people and corruption and compromising, because if no one gets too much
attention in the mainstream media or the mid media, you see what I'm saying? It just keeps the
discussion from getting hijacked and bought and owned. So I'm hoping and praying that he does
bring this to some kind of, one of the things I said to him directly, I mean, we had an interaction
by email because he wasn't happy with my lack of, I mean, I, I, I expect more. And I said to him,
you are Congress. You have the power to, to defund the FDA, to shut them down, to stop it,
to call in a citizen panel of experts and reconstitute it. I mean, this is an agency that
is literally committing domestic terrorism, a worldwide terrorism, really by extension.
So these, these, these legislators cannot move quick enough and they should be moving beyond
what I call, you know, just, just the theater. It's just, you know, we used to have Trey Gowdy,
if you recall, you know, some of this in American history, recent American history,
who oversaw the Benghazi hearings, right? There were clear crimes committed. Americans were killed
over there while, you know, some former officials sat in a room in Washington, D.C. and watched it.
I mean, while the, while the special operators, you know, begged for help. So, but Trey Gowdy,
we call him, there's a, there's a phrase in Texas called all hat, no cattle. That means you're a big
shop, but you really don't own anything. Okay. So when I say you're all hearings, no indictments,
that was Trey Gowdy with, you never saw anything come out of the Benghazi hearing. So,
you know, I don't want to see that happen here, but I'm afraid that so far all we have are hearings,
right? And in the last two or three minutes, the, the, and I don't know what the arrangement was or
the coordination, but it was in the last two or three minutes that Thomas Renz was allowed to speak,
the attorney who at the time was the attorney for the three main whistleblowers, right?
Lieutenant Colonel Dr. Teresa Long, Lieutenant Colonel Pete, Dr. Pete Chambers. And the reason
I have to get off here at six o'clock is because I'm going to be interviewing the third whistleblower
tonight, Major Dr. Sam Sigaloff, right? So just, he was given that little bit of time, you know,
I mean, that should have been like a third of that, of that entire hearing. Now that's just
Dr. Jane's opinion. And you know that that and 50 cents will get you a cup of coffee. But I just,
I worry when I see things, why wasn't Dr. David Martin? You all heard him speak. He's got proof of
so many things. It's very clear. He's got documentation that you wouldn't believe.
And, and that should shut this whole thing down immediately, especially on our military. Why wasn't
he at that table? Someone like him, it's not just about the women, but they're just saying there's a
whole chunk of scientists left out, but including, you know, somebody like, you know, I'm shocked.
Dr. Martin should have been at the head of that table, much less he wasn't even in the room.
Why are certain people-
I couldn't agree more. And we've got the same issue here. You may or may not be aware that
we lodged a criminal complaint at the Metropolitan Police, which is the biggest police force in the
UK. And the evidence that we submitted as a collective is absolutely vast, damning and
irrefutable. And David Martin's evidence was submitted. The lawyer, Mr. Renz, his evidence
was submitted, his videos, everything was submitted. Anybody who's in any way, shape or form got any
kind of brain, looks at that evidence, sees the credibility of those witnesses and their expertise.
It's nailed on that the 15 people who were named as responsible, criminally responsible and liable
for the worst crimes ever committed in the history of mankind. The fact that they've turned around
and said, no crimes are identified in itself is a crime, but don't worry, we're pursuing that.
That's, that's not, we're not going away. We're like a wasp around a picnic table. We're annoying.
So thank you for answering the question. It's nice to meet you and keep up the great work.
Thank you so much. And yes, I've been following and glad to hear you're going to persist. Thank you.
Well done, Mark. Okay. So we've got three more minutes because Stephen Frost, Jane, gets the
last four minutes with you. So Leonard, commonly known Lenny. Charles, I just want to let you know,
we've had a little, you know, modification. I do have an extra 15 minutes if you want me to stay
longer. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, please. Excellent. Wonderful. Why not? Yep. All right. Thank you,
Mark Leonard. Any. Hey, thanks, Charles and Dr. Ruby, long time fan, first time caller, so to speak.
Great to have the opportunity to ask a question. So you touched on my original question earlier
regarding the hotlots and the, from the research I've been doing with a group of docs, it's apparent
that the estimation of only about 20% of the vaccines seem to be producing adverse events so
far. Emphasis on the so far. So is there any science that you're aware of or any investigation
on whether that is truly just because only about 20% appear to have the additional mechanisms or
elements to produce the all of the horrendous effects we're seeing? Or is there some other
mechanism that may be time delayed for lack of a better way to phrase it, that we could be
seeing at a whole other level of effects coming, even though they may not have the same ingredients
as the ones that produce the effects early on? Does that make sense? Yeah, absolutely. And thank
you. Thank you for the kind words earlier. I just have to say, you know, it's, it sounds like I'm
taking the easy way out, but you know what, there's no way to know. That's the short answer. The
longer answer is this. And it goes back to my discussion about Congress, bring these companies
in full disclosure or bust them up. You know, you've got the power to do that. They're the only ones
that know what's in this stuff at any given day or time or lot number. And yet they are allowed to
run rampant and let the rest of us struggle to try to answer those questions. What now we can put,
we can piece pieces together, which is what we've done. We're cobbling this thing together.
And there's enough there, I think, to be afraid to shut this thing down. There's a threshold for
death. I mean, as we're way beyond it, but we don't have all the pieces. So it's very difficult
to answer a question like Leonard's that is incredibly important. I want to give you just a
little point of reference, right? A little comparator. When I first started in pharma,
I was with a company that no longer exists called Forest Laboratories in New York City.
And Forest Labs, I'm sure you know their history. They launched Selexa, the famous antidepressant.
I came along shortly after that. My task was to develop and launch Lexapro, right? The lefty
enantiomer of that molecule. But here's the point of the story. I had to learn everything about
Selexa first. And one of the first things I learned was in the preclinical, which is animals
and petri dishes, right? Clinical is human. In the preclinical, they run it through several
species of animal, right? They start with the rats and they go a little bit higher. They go to dogs.
Six beagle dogs had a heart attack and died. The FDA shut that company down for two years,
said, go back and figure it out. Make sure it doesn't transfer to humans. You're not even
going to get near phase one human trials until you figure that out. Turned out it was a genetic
anomaly, not only specific to dogs, but only to beagle dogs, right? And they went on. The rest
of this history, they made a billion dollars a year on Selexa and the rest was wonderful for them.
But the point of my story is that kind of sensitivity to shut down, hey, shut down,
go figure it out. You're not putting anything out in public until you figure that one out.
We have, if the VAERS, the Harvard Pilgrim study is correct on any level, less than 1% of all vaccine
related adverse events are captured into VAERS. I mean, come on, that's a 100 multiplier. So if
there are 25,000 deaths in the United States in the VAERS system that they've allowed you to see,
that's with the CDC criminal activity. I think the Harvard Pilgrim study was before that crime
of manipulation of the numbers, or maybe it wasn't, who knows? But that's as much as 2.5
million people are dead. What are we doing? How much more evidence do we need? Right? What more
do we need? It's silent. It's very concerning. So. Thank you. Thank you, Leonard. Peter Hooger,
Jane is a lawyer in UK, former police officer. Ah, nice combination.
Thank you. Hi, Dr. Jane Ruby. Thank you so much for speaking to us. Yeah. All I can say is your
talk wasn't a rant. It was a pep talk that many of us needed right now. And for that,
I thank you from our hearts. Oh, well, thank you. You can thank Stephen. He,
yeah, he does a lot of good work. He somehow, in spite of my rants in this thread we're on,
he was kind enough to invite me in spite of all that. So I, you can thank him.
Brilliant. Now, thank you so much. My question you've touched upon actually, if people like
Rainer Völmich as a top barrister who took on Volkswagen Deutsche Bank, among others, can't get
a voice as well as top doctors like yourselves, top scientists, Mark Sexton with the wonderful
work he's done with the Metropolitan Police. You know, we are coming up against a brick wall
in all the countries. And there's a lot of common denominators here, which feeds in obviously to the
WEF and the one world government plans that they have. We all know this and we can't go down that
rabbit hole tonight. But have you got any tips for the people here with all the different disciplines?
What should we be doing? Should we just be chipping away, drilling little holes in the
dam, hoping that it should burst? Last night, obviously, as Charles said, you know, information
came out about the Biden family. And I looked at some of those emails earlier and yeah, they're
shocking. But what will come of it? What tips have you got for us for getting this out there?
You know, Peter, I, there's an old saying, if I had the answer to that, we'd all be billionaires
and retired and, you know, sitting on an island somewhere sipping a cocktail. The point is, I don't
mean to be flip, but the point is, there are so many layers to this. It's so complex. I once asked,
I don't know if you are, any of you are familiar with Dr. Shiva Ayurverde. He's a very interesting
guy. You should look up his talks and things like that. And he was on a Zoom that I was on once. And
I asked him, what do you, how are, are we being attacked? Is it, I want to, I'm an analyst at heart,
right? So I like to look upstream, upstream. What's at the top that's doing this thing?
And he said, I don't think it's a top down. I think it's something called the swarm method.
I think we're being approached. And this is something Peter, or David Martin gets into,
he doesn't call it that, but he describes that this criminal conspiracy involves a lot of different
people in a lot of different industries. Right. And I don't, that's a pretty incredible conspiracy
and collaboration because it, they kind of, it's like the fire ants, you know, by themselves,
they're nothing, but when they get together and they signal and they bite at once, they can really
hurt you. And so it's very strange to me. I've asked General Michael Flynn this question. I've
asked a lot of prominent people. What is your opinion on the lockstep nature of this? How do
you get every country, every industry, every airline, right? Every, you go down to every,
every, every, to pretty much all be doing the same thing. And I'll tell you why it, when it hit me
early, it was almost like a tragedy opened a door for me early. And I'll make it really brief. In
March of 2020, and you know, I'm trained medically. So I was doing all this antisepsis stuff, the
gloves, I didn't go anywhere. I got, I got it. I got whatever this flu was. Right. And I was very
sick for six weeks, but here's the point of the story. When my doctor called me of many years,
that I had a great relationship with, and he said, Jane, you're positive. And I said, okay, all right.
Whoa, whoa, whoa. We're not going to freak out. You're going to prescribe the hydroxychloroquine.
Right. That's, that's all we knew at the time. And I said, and anything else, you know, you want me
to take, you know, protect my lungs, whatever it is. And he said to me, I can't do that. And I said,
you know, I'm a, I'm a prescriber myself. Right. So I'm thinking, I said, why? He said, you have to
be in the ICU for me to give you that I HCQ. I said, well, why would you wait till I was that sick?
And you know, something he, his next words, Peter, to me changed everything in that moment.
I knew the world had changed. And I'll tell you what he said to me,
Jane, you're going to have to tough this one out. And he hung up on me.
Whoa.
Something when I, when I started to feel better, whoa, that's not the same person.
When I started to feel better, I started to look, I lived in Virginia and I looked at,
why is he doing this? I looked at the state department of health. There was an edict by
the governor who was a communist, but we won't talk about that right now. And he prohibited
physicians and nurse practitioners from prescribing hydroxychloroquine. I'm thinking, what does he care?
Then I started to get nosy and I started to look at other states and I saw that not only were other
states doing it, but they were using the same language. Somebody was coordinating them.
And that's when I almost lost it. Cause I thought, Oh my God, something very bad is happening in the
world. But for me, it gave me the antenna really early, right? Many people, many months to go,
whoa, wait a minute, something strange here, too much coordination. So that's where I think we have
to focus. I don't think we can look to any, to be honest with you, I love to beat up my elected
officials because that's what Americans should be doing. That's what we do. It's what we're known for,
but you're not going to go anywhere with it, right? It's really going to be we, the people.
And we, the people is about leaders like yourselves, educating people constantly,
being consistent, teaching people, keeping it simple. Don't use the word vaccine. Stop calling
it a vaccination. Tell people, you know, imagine if I said to a mother of a five-year-old, you're
going to take your kid in to get that vaccine. And she's going to look at me and go, yeah, you're damn
right. I am. I want to protect my kid. But if I say to her, you're going to take your child in
to get injected with a bio weapon that was developed in silico on a computer that to make
your child a perpetual spike protein factory. You know, she might tell me I'm an a-hole and,
you know, walk away from me, but she's also going to walk away and think I better look into that.
Yeah. Right. It's a bio weapon. What does she mean by that? What a nut, but I'm going to go look it
up. You're not going to go look it up if you keep calling it a vaccine. Yeah. Thank you, doctor.
You're my pleasure. Thank you, Peter. Excellent question. Dan, we've got you now.
You're muted, Dan. Yes, you're muted. I hate doing that. I think you're muted.
Thanks. Might be a ventriloquist or something. I just want to say thanks a lot for everything
you're doing, Dr. Ruby, and you and Dr. McCall, Dr. Malone, Dr. Cole, all the leaders that are
out there giving us the courage to step forward locally. I agree with your plan there. You've got
to start locally and the courage here is contagious in the local area where I am.
Leading on you experts and leaders in the field, give us that confidence, build the support locally,
and I think we can create a wave. My question for you is once we create the wave of knowledge,
that's what I'm trying to do on my own is create a wave of knowledge about how the vaccines work
and what injuries they cause. I think we can build a huge, we can force the elected officials
to deal with us and deal with the information at some point in time, but I don't ever see, like an
earlier questioner was commenting, a congressional hearing never goes anywhere. Where do you experts
see us taking this criminal conspiracy in the future so that there are charges and indictments
that take place? It's very frustrating. We're all very frustrated here in the United States,
seeing these hearings over and over again and nothing. What do you see happening as the
eventuality here and how can we take care of this to prevent it from ever happening again?
Yeah, it's a wonderful question. I wish I had more substance with which to answer it. It's kind of a
crystal ball question, but I do have faith in people. And somebody, a very young person in my
midst, in my family, reminded me a few months ago that in the Revolutionary War in America,
there were only about 15, 17% of the people that were actually pulling off the revolution.
You don't have to get everybody, but the thing that concerns me is that these shots have an agenda.
And I don't even think we've hit the tip of the iceberg. I think there are going to be mental
issues. I think it's going to end up overwhelming the rest of us who didn't take these shots with
illness and deviations and piling on and things like that. And it's going to get very confusing
for people. So I think the earlier we can educate people and inform them, the ones that are open to
listening and edifying them, and sometimes you have to do it over and over again, I think the sooner
we'll have at least our 15 to 17%. I mean, we probably already do, but what my fear is that
it's not just the King of England we're trying to overthrow. This is a lot of unknown enemies
and it's a lot of an agenda that is so sinister and so dangerous. And so, what's the word,
it's like tentacles in terms of, like look at our military. I mean, just to see the number of deaths
and disability with this latest explosion from the military database, which is from what I understand,
pristine compared to theirs. You can only input it if you're a military physician and
military physicians maintain it. There's enough death and destruction in there, right? To cause
high ranking officers to risk their lives. Don't think they're not afraid for their lives,
but to come out and say, people are dying every day. You have 20 and 30 year olds that are dropping
dead of heart attacks and strokes. I mean, what are we doing? And yet we don't have anybody in
Congress. We have nobody in any kind of law enforcement. So what will it take? I want to
get back to your answer. I'm just going to fall back on Dr. David Martin, who said, all I need is
one prosecutor somewhere. And we do have some judges that haven't been bought and paid for,
even at the federal level, and they have been issuing injunctions and things like that. So we
need to build on it. I don't know beyond that. I just am really amazed at how lockstep this thing
is, how this has been allowed to go so far so quickly. It really concerns me.
And I think getting things organized like you guys are doing here with doctors for COVID ethics is
very important, you know, especially in the local, getting people together, that there are things we
can accomplish together. I can tell you this, me and some colleagues have been out in front of our
hospital or nearby at a busier intersection out demonstrating against the vaccine mandates. And
it's, it's incredible. Yeah, stop calling them vaccines. Start calling them bio weapons.
The bio weapons. Yes. It's hard to do, but once you get it, believe me, it's very contagious,
and it teaches people a lot. And it very much concerns me that frontline doctors that are famous
now continue to call it that. It concerns me and it raises my antenna because I've mentioned it to
some of them over and over again, and yet they still do it. Just saying. I totally agree. Words
matter. Very powerful. Thank you, Dan. And indeed, language drives behavior. Now,
Jane, next question is Stephen. Stephen, before we go to any other question, because I'm,
I want to make sure you get your questions in as the organizer of this group, Jane.
Stephen's the guru or the initiator. Go, Stephen. Understood. First of all, Jane, so sorry for
missing the beginning. I might as well be honest. I lay on the bed about two hours before this
meeting, having been up too much the night before and previous nights. And I fell asleep and missed
the beginning completely. So I'm so sorry. I just wanted to ask you, I agree with you about
using the word vaccine. Even I fall for that. But I correct myself sometimes.
I just wondered whether you've got any contacts in Hollywood or elsewhere,
Egypt politics, media, military, police, who you could put us in contact with.
And also, I'm particularly interested in you mentioned Trey Gowdy. There was another guy
used to work with him. Jason Chaffetz. Do you remember him? I used to watch both of them on
YouTube for hours, especially Trey Gowdy. He's one of the most successful prosecutors the United
States has ever had. He hasn't lost a case, I believe. Unfortunately, he didn't try the
Benghazi case. I said, unfortunately, he didn't do anything with the Benghazi case. Sure. Yeah.
So but but someone like him, what do you know what his position is? Because if you could get
him on board, that might make the difference because he is a prosecutor. No, no. He has a very
cushy contract with Fox News. He's not going anywhere. And the same with Jason Chaffetz. I
lost my respect for him because he left in the middle of a term. You know, many people would love
to be a United States senator or congressperson. So when you get elected by the people, that's a
very powerful thing. And I mean, I'm assuming everywhere, but in the United States, that's the
magic, okay, the power of the people. So when I take it very seriously, when someone leaves in the
middle of their term to take a seven or eight figure contract job, and that and Jason Chaffetz
did that as well with Fox News. So you have to understand, I said before, and maybe you missed
it, maybe you weren't here yet, I hold my elected officials in very, very high at very high standards.
And I should be because they've they've asked to represent us. And that's an incredible, powerful
honor in my country. So to me, call me crazy. But I don't think they'll do anything. I think they
would have done it by now. And if someone had a case like Benghazi, Trey Gowdy oversaw the Benghazi
hearings the whole time, like over a year or two. Did you ever see an indictment or anything come
out of that? I mean, that was like taking candy from a baby, to be honest with you, as cases go.
So no, I don't expect people like him to do anything. I think they're pretty much incentivized
to just go along. But hang on a minute. These crimes, the worst crimes ever committed, in my opinion,
they involve everybody, including Jason Chaffetz's family and Trey Gowdy's family,
that themselves, except that, except that Congress and their families are exempt from taking those
shots. Makes a difference, doesn't it? Yeah, plus their staff, is that right?
I've heard the staff, I've heard the staff heard the staff of the White House, the current staff.
I've heard that that can that can if that is, if that's true, that's a really key fact in the
United States, isn't it? It's one thing that someone like you can use over and over again.
So I think that we've got to be really creative in the techniques we use and we have to be creative
in how we use words and how we use angles as well. But what I'm really afraid of is that they are now
stopping these measures which were never medically justified. And I think the politicians are hoping
that we won't remember, we want to forget the past two years, and that we will forget. And I'm
determined that we hold them to account. And David Martin, I absolutely agree with you, he's one of
the best people on our side. And if I had to choose one person as the leader, it would probably be him.
Me too. And Craig Pardecuper, he is a genius. And we need to get behind him too.
Whether he's right about everything. I was gonna say great. Yeah, absolutely great work. You're
right. He's working so fast. And whether we agree with everything, but the work he's done has been
groundbreaking. That Team Enigma work is, I was the first to say it, I think you missed it,
because it was in the earlier part of either my comments or an answer to someone. But I'm Team
Enigma all the way. And in fact, I have someone from the team on my show probably every other week,
because they're always breaking something new from Craig's work. Exactly. So can I just ask you,
what do you think is our best line of attack? Should we concentrate on deaths? Because when I
actually ask people about the number of deaths, they've got absolutely no idea. And even people
on our side have no idea. They're not good with figures or whatever. But I know that the deaths
in the UK, the US and the EU, that's a population of approximately 850 million.
There's 70,000 at the moment, round about 70,000, probably over. I haven't done the latest figures.
I've been keeping, I published these figures in July of last year. I was told that they didn't
matter. And indeed, that I shouldn't publish them as a doctor. And I still think that that's the
most important thing to get out there. And I think using the figure of the underreporting factor of
six, you still come to a figure of 420,000. That's Jessica Rose's figure, by the way,
six is the under, Steve Coors says 40. And then you've got 2,400,000, sorry, 2,800,000 deaths.
And with 100, which you were talking about, because there was a paper, if you remember,
which said 10 to 100. I think it was talking about theirs. But interestingly, the US figures
are right in the middle. So the UK are they're hiding deaths, in my opinion. So if you compare
the UK figures per population to the EU's figures, then they're about the UK figures are about a
third of what they should be compared to the United States, they're about half. So in other words,
the US is two, twice as many deaths as you'd, sorry, twice as many deaths as you'd expect looking at
the UK figures, sorry, the EU is three times as many. So anyway, the point is that if it's 100
times the underreporting factor, we're talking about 7 million deaths. And then if you've got
just that for the whole world, you know, you could say twice as many for the whole world,
because obviously, the coverage is not as great around the world. But say twice, you're left with
a huge figure, if you say four times, then you've got in the case of the six times you've got
you've got 420,000 times four, so you're talking about 1,680,000. And that's the lowest. And if
it's 100 times, we're talking about 28 million. So that's the kind of figure that grabs people's
attention. Because we're talking in terms, you know, in the same order as 6 million, which is
what the Nazi Holocaust was. And, and this is worse than the Nazi Holocaust, in my opinion,
it's global. And I don't know, you know, if those figures, they really speak to me, but I don't,
I can't get people to maybe they don't want to understand them, especially medical doctors.
And I just wonder what you think, how can we use those figures, because I can supply those
figures to you if you like. I know there's been a lot of work that has gone into developing those.
And I know several of the folks that you mentioned that helped put those together.
You know, my comment is I take a Mac, I step back and take a more macro view and say, look,
how much of a threshold do you need? 1000 deaths, 10 million deaths. I mean, there's no threshold
that seems to get anybody's attention. I agree. Not even not even the masses. So to not end on doom
and gloom, I would say that we're not going to get relief from our leaders, we're going to have
to find those pockets of judges, we're going to have to really teach people as they start to see.
I agree with Edward Dowd said something recently, if you've heard a lot of his work with the
insurance companies, he said something really profound. He said, people are going to find out
and see what we've been trying to tell them, large, large masses of them. And when they do,
there's going to be a groundswell, and they're going to be pissed off. And there's going to be
a lot, there's going to be a tipping point. And I'm hoping that he's right. And I'm hoping that
that tipping point becomes where we start to have parallel. I don't want to call it a tribunal. I
mean, I don't want to get overly dramatic, but we are going to need citizen. I mean, we're going to
have to replicate what we cannot get from our systems, right? What else do we have? What choice
do we have? Those of us who have not gone along with this and have not taken them or have taken
them and realized, hey, this is part of a bigger plan. I'm not going there anymore. You know, that
that army of us is is really what we're going to need, but we're going to need to do something.
And if we don't have it, we have to start creating it. I think that'll happen. But again,
a previous question, we're going to have to start where we are. And I think we should start pretty
quickly, because I'd rather have some systems, parallel systems begun, you know, working out
some kinks, and not need them later on, than to do the opposite and be caught without anything at all.
Because I think they are going to try to over when I say they I don't even know who that is.
But because I keep saying, I don't know what's at the top of this food chain. But I can tell you,
when you get the entire US military leadership to force this on our people who are dying in front of
them every day, something's very wrong. Something or someone is in charge. I don't even know how we
grapple it, because we don't even know what and what comprises it. Exactly. What about some so I
mentioned Hollywood, you don't know anybody that no, no, I do have to cut, I do have to cut out,
I apologize, Steven. But I don't know I don't know anyone in Hollywood, I would, I would not
want to know anyone in Hollywood right now, to be honest with you. So I'm the wrong person to ask.
You know, they've done a lot to perpetuate a lot of problems in our country. They're sort of a
sub. So Jane, before you go on a share with everybody, and Jane, this is relevant to what
you've been talking about this wonderful picture that came across my desk yesterday. Can everybody
see that? So it's a monopoly, monopoly board with the people underneath. If the people stand,
the game is over. Oh, I love that. I love that. Send that over Charles.
So Jane, thank you so much for being with us. We understand the time frame. And thank you for
giving us this time, Steven. Well done for organizing Jane to be with us, everybody.
Jane, when is your show on? So we will the stupidest show we all know about and your
show started when and what time is it on? Thank you. Thank you. It's on the Stu Peters
network. You can look go to red voice media, red, the color red voice media or Stu Peters.tv.
It'll all take you there. It's every Monday, Wednesday and Friday, I follow Stu right after
his show, which is a great, great thing. People just stay with me. And I do a live show on
brighton TV with Mike Adams, the health ranger live every Monday night. So thank you so much.
And Steven, thank you for inviting me and thinking of all this. And Charles, you've been a great
moderator. Thank you. It's a pleasure. So Jane, the reason I asked you was because you made
ranted. I thought we need some spirit like that. Yeah, I rabble roused in there. I probably didn't
make any new friends. Steven is a new one. But you know, thank you for having me guys. It's been fun.
Everybody, stay strong. Thank you so much. Don't call it a vaccine. Yes.