Health.
All right, everybody welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International and to today's discussion, whether you're live with us today or watching a recording.
This group was founded by Dr. Stephen Frost during the darkest days of the COVID scam responses with a desire to pursue truth, ethics, justice, freedom and health.
Stephen has stood up against government and power over the years and has been a whistleblower and activist. His medical specialty is radiology.
I'm Charles Covess, the moderator of this group. I'm Australasia's passion provocateur. I practiced law for 20 years before changing career 30 years ago.
And over the last 12 years, I've helped parents and lawyers to strategize remedies for vaccine damage and damage from bad medical advice.
In fact, yesterday on my TNT radio program, which is now also video, I interviewed Beverly Holt, who lost her sister the day that she got her whooping cough injection as a baby.
Her mother said to her father, don't we don't want this injection, don't want this injection.
The father said the doctor said to advise it had the whooping cough injection died four hours later.
I'm also the CEO of an industrial hemp company. We comprise lots of professions, including doctors, lawyers, homeopaths, journalists, scientists, filmmakers, professors, peacemakers and troublemakers.
And we're from all around the world. Many of us thought the vaccines were okay. Now many of us proudly say yes, we are passionate anti-vaxxers.
And in fact, Paul Alexander yesterday quoted Stephanie.
Sorry, sorry, sorry, sorry. Who did he quote yesterday? Who I've been following for a long time. Just said absolutely no vaccines. I'll remember her name in a moment.
Long time, long time advocate for safety.
Dr. Suzanne Humphries.
That's right, Suzanne Humphries. Thank you very much. Thank you.
And I looked at the links on that on that post that Paul Alexander did and they're wonderful reminders of stuff that's been published for the last over 100 years back to 1890s, 1880s.
If this is your first time here, welcome and feel free to introduce yourself in the chat and where you're from. If you publish a newsletter or a podcast or you have a radio or TV show or you've written a book, put the links into the chat so we can follow you, promote you, find you.
Most of us understand we're in the middle of World War Three and that there are various battle lines as part of this war. It's not just a medical scientific debate.
Most of us understand the development of science and that the science is never settled.
Some of us believe in viruses, some do not. Some are on the fence.
The meeting runs for two and a half hours after which for those with the time Tom Rodman runs a video telegram meeting. Tom puts the links into the chat if you're able to join.
We'll listen to Dr Lee Merritt, our guest, for as long as Lee wishes to speak. I'm told Lee you're going to go for an hour and a half, which is wonderful, I hope so.
And then we have Q&A and this is the second time that Lee has presented to us. It's been a while since the last time. It's wonderful to have you back. Thank you Daria for organising Lee to be with us.
Stephen Frost, by long established tradition, asks the first questions for 15 minutes. There's no censorship.
It's a free speech environment.
Free speech is crucially important in our fight to preserve our human freedoms. And on Sky News yesterday or yesterday morning, it was announced by a Professor Anthony Timming, an American in Australia, that the Free Speech Union has been set up in Australia, emulating the US Free Speech Union and the UK Free Speech Union.
If you're offended by anything, be offended. We're genuinely not interested. We reject the offence industry that requires nobody to say anything that may offend another. We come with an attitude and perspective of love, not fear. Fear is the opposite of love. Fear squashes you. Love, on the other hand, expands you.
These twice weekly meetings are not just talkfests. An extraordinary range of actions and initiatives have been generated from linkages made by attendees in these meetings.
If you have a solution or a product or links or resources that will help people put the details into the chat, the meeting is recorded and uploaded onto the Rumble channel.
And now welcome to Lee Merritt, MD, our guest presenter. And we thank you so much, Lee, for giving us your time, wisdom and insights. And we thank you, Daria, again for organising Lee. And thank you, Stephen Frost, for creating this group.
Lee, we are in your hands.
Well, thank you so much. I don't normally take notes on introductions, but I had that such a great quote about being offended. So I had to write that down.
Thanks again. I really I'm honored to be here. And, you know, I started talking about COVID because I came out and talk about the masks, but things have moved on. And so my talk today, really, I'm going to go over several things and I'm going to try and convince you that we've been deceived on a massive scale.
I don't think you guys need much convincing. I'm going to just go over some of the methods that I think were used to deceive physicians, scientists, and then the people. And I'm going to suggest what I think is really going on.
And then, you know, this is a if we're to survive, we have to have a correct view of reality. So this is kind of my reality, my reality talk here. And I will share screen.
All right. So, you know, I don't really mind being called a conspiracy theorist anymore because I'm in good company here. This is one of my favorite quotes by J. Edgar Hoover, who said, the individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous that he cannot believe it exists.
Now, you know, I first started speaking out thinking this was just a disease. And I was quickly disabused of that notion. I was on the Alex Newman show early on and I said, look, I said, this is not a normal disease, what we're seeing in China and at that time, Italy and New York.
I said, this is a bio weapon. And they're talking about a vaccine and that will be doubled down on this bio weapon and people need to wake up, we need to change. And this is what happened. This I podcast from a little basement closet. But this slide I got from Brian bridle.
But this was from Columbia University. And I thought to myself, doesn't big old Columbia University have something better to do? Then the answer is no, because we're in an information war, and they know information that's when you're when you're it's dangerous.
So when you know you're right when you're like you said when you're catching flak, you're over the target. So, you know, military air maxim. And then I spoke at the AFLDS years ago and I said this is a national security nightmare to vaccinate our entire military, not to mention the
border patrol police trauma surgeons, everybody who maintains the security infrastructure of America with a product you don't know anything about and whose blueprint if you believe the narrative came from the communist Chinese not necessarily our allies.
So what's going on here? That's when I woke up and said, this is not a disease. This is we're in a war. And it's a very strange war, but we need to start viewing this in different light. So my talk today is modern medicine. Welcome to the Truman show.
Now, if you remember the Truman show, which was I had not seen it until a few months ago, I've gone back and I'm starting to watch Hollywood for their predictive programming and things. And this is not just a metaphor. I tell you the Truman show is a blueprint in my opinion for what's going on.
But here you have Jim Carrey and he's playing a guy who was born into a false reality, just like we are. He was born into a false reality because he was an unwitting child star and then he became an adult on a reality TV show.
And the first question is why he why couldn't he he's 30 years old. He's an insurance salesman. He's got a wife. He's got friends. He thinks these people are all real, but it turns out they're all actors.
Why did he not pick up on this? Well, two things they did. Number one, the set is on an island and he's been given a rational fear of water so he can't get off the island. That's what keeps him in the show and a rational fear.
And the second thing is everything is internally consistent and that internal consistency is what's hampering us. You know, when you talk whether whatever you talk about scientifically is going to fit in like a key and a lock with other things that we know.
But it doesn't necessarily mean the whole system is true. Now he accepted this for 30 years until one day it started kind of falling apart for him. And he started noticing little chinks.
In fact, by the way, speaking of fears, I think this is kind of funny when periodically people would feel bad for Truman and they would run onto the set. They'd sneak onto the island, run onto the set, said Truman Truman, you're you're living a lie.
This whole place is just a nonsense. It's just it's a TV show and you don't realize it. Well, what happens is they had this controllers, the director and the controllers in the control room.
They were ready for that. When that happened, they would throw it. They would run an ambulance in with people that looked like they were from an asylum staff and they would then take take these people off and say, we're sorry, Mr.
Truman, but these so and so escaped from the insane asylum. Well, I would say to that we've seen that in our world. What happens in our world? Well, in our world, what happens like Andre Sakharov, the famous Soviet nuclear nuclear physicist, and he was trying to speak out against
nuclear weapons at the height of the Cold War. And what happened? Well, they said he got thrown into the same asylum. They couldn't put him in a gulag because he was, you know, very prominent guy. But he was trying to talk and they said, oh, Dr.
Sakharov, he's he's ill. We're taking care of him. You know, he put him in an insane asylum. And that's what happened to the people in the Truman show. So but he started noticing oddities.
And the first thing that happened in the Truman show is this big light falls off the sky. Now he's looking up and he's saying, why is there a light in the sky? This is a stage light. So he's starting to get a glimpse. Now, for me, I will tell you that light falling off the sky was the PCR tests.
And, you know, I know you we've heard this, I'm not going to belabor this, but we know that Kerry Mullis, the Nobel laureate that invented the PCR test, it was made as a lab test. It was never made for diagnosis. And in fact, he said very vehemently this could never be used for diagnosis.
And I think I'm going to show you why later. But the other thing we know was it was it was over is over cycled. Now, most people just we were told that we kind of figured that out. But the implication of that is what I want to say here is that it wasn't just one lab that over cycled this.
It was labs all over the world. I looked at the thermal Fisher brochure that came with the test and it says very clearly, you're supposed to cycle these tests between 20 and 30 times, you have to cycle amplify this stuff because you're dealing with, you know, tiny, tiny, tiny pieces of genetic material.
So you have to cycle it some and so 20 to 30 is the optimum if you go over 30 to 35, you start getting false positives. If you go over 35, it's completely meaningless because you're cycling junk, you're you're you're showing up, you know, nonsense.
And yet the US Army was cycling at 45 times. And all over the world. The labs were over cycling now on random chance alone if this had been an accident, some labs would have under cycled and none did.
So the first thing we should have realized is it takes some juice in the world to bring that about. Somebody has some big power in the world to cause all these labs to act against what is written in the policy manual for the test.
That's number one. But here's the one that really got me.
But here's the one that really got me. About September, October of 2020. At this point, I'd been unemployed because I was speaking against the mask so my orthopedic contract was canceled.
And I started looking more deeply into some things and I learned how to use the BLAST program. Now, by this point, a lot of genetic sequences from the so called SARS-CoV-2 had been uploaded into the gene bank so they should have been there.
But I decided I wonder what they're really testing on these PCR tests. So every PCR test, there were 18 tests. There were six devised by the Drosten Group, six devised by the Louis Pasteur Institute, and six devised by the CDC.
And they used little different areas. And the story, which sounds again very internally consistent, very rational, is that this is a novel virus. If we just do this short sequence and we find it in you, then you've got the virus or you've been exposed to the virus.
It sounds all science-y and right. But then when I took those 16 segment sequences that were on those tests and I ran them through the BLAST program, you would expect that it should show up SARS-CoV-2.
Because the BLAST program is an index to the gene bank. But in fact, I quit after 12 tests because every one of those tests showed up, homo sapiens.
In other words, they were testing us to sequences found in our own genome. That really is when I started realizing there's a big problem here.
Then I took another step back and I said, could this even work? In theory, does this even make sense? Can this possibly be real science?
So just on the face of it, you and I and all humans have 3.4 billion base pairs in our genome. We share 50% with bananas, unless you're a politician, then you might share more.
But an onion has about 11 billion base pairs. Now, why do they have so many, we have so few? Well, it turns out, just like big corporations do, the human body outsources jobs to bacteria.
It outsources a lot of function, like your immune system and your gut. Even your skin, some of the integrity of your skin is maintained by the bacteria.
You've got bacteria in your vagina and your rectum everywhere and in your nose. So they're going to tell us, and for the lay people, I always say it, we're not talking about 3.4 billion bases in our entire body.
We're talking about in every cell in the body. So when they stick a 16 base test up your nose, they're testing 16 bases and you've got a sea of genetic material in there, not just from you.
You've got bacterial. And what about the pollen that got into your nose? What about the fruit fly that flew up your nose when you were doing a podcast, which happens to me routinely in the summer?
Where does that genetic material go? And how about this guy's under his fingernails? I mean, the nose is a dirty place and sticking the swab up there and telling you with 16 bases, I can tell you if you've been exposed to this virus, is nonsense.
I mean, this is like taking a teaspoon out of the ocean to check for impurities. It just doesn't work this way. It just can't work this way. And if you don't believe that one, here's another tell.
And I looked this up. I followed this. This is not just an internet falsehood. On two patent offices, the European and the American Patent Office, this is patented and it was patented in 2015 by Richard Rothschild.
And it's a patent for testing, a COVID-19 testing. Now, the fact checkers all came out and said, oh, false, false, false, false, false. This could be any Richard Rothschild.
Well, that's not even the question. I don't care who owns the patent. The point is that in 2019, I remember very distinctly when they were making a big deal in December about what they're going to name this new disease and what they're going to and it was, well, with this and that.
And then they settled on COVID-19. But you see, all that was just for show. That's just part of the Truman Show because they had already developed the name for it in 2015.
That's the point of this. And by the way, you know, real people don't fact check. Real people put out what they believe is the truth and then they might put out a few words of why they don't think you're right.
When you see fact checkers with kind of the same language coming out and false, false, false, false, false, I learned this from an intelligence officer. That's an intelligence program being run against you.
I think that's right.
Which gets to me to the point that we're in an information war. Yes, it's partly kinetic and it's biologic and chemical, but we are primarily in an information war.
And information wars are not as simple as we think. You know, it's not just planting false battle plans on dead German soldiers in Normandy.
This is a lot more sophisticated now. They can really change your view of what world reality is. And if you haven't seen this, I highly recommend this video. It's called Ghosts in the Machine.
You can find it on YouTube. Ghosts in the Machine.
Hang on, someone's on the mic.
Anyway, Ghosts in the Machine and look for the one with this funny clown on it. It's a four minute video that shows how PsyOps can mold what you see as reality in the world.
And this video is actually a recruiting video for the US Army Psychologic Operations Battalion or Division.
So when we talk about the fog of war now, we used to talk about battlefield confusion fog and it was real fog like fell on General Washington outside of New York.
Well, now we're talking about the information space confusion. And it's what you said earlier about James Giordano.
It's like the new battlefield is our brain. And that's where we are right now.
I love this quote by Yubil Noah Harari. I don't quote him very often, but he's right on with this one. He said, censorship no longer works by hiding information from you.
Censorship works by flooding you with immense amounts of misinformation, of irrelevant information, of funny cat videos until you're just unable to focus.
And I see that all the time. You know, they're trying to we were kind of group two groups of people in the world now, people that are doing independent research and people that are just sucking in what they give you in the mainstream media and all these and getting distracted with all the sports and the and the tick tocks and all this kind of stuff.
And they can mold it for your society so they distract you as much as possible.
Now, at the at the towards the end of the Truman Show, Truman figures out something's wrong.
And he's he decides that he's going to have to take this on. He's going to have to explore. He's going to have to get outside the boundaries. But what does he have to do to do that? He has to conquer his fear of water.
They gave him an irrational fear of water so he'd never leave the island for 30 years. He's been stuck there with this irrational fear.
And I would I would say what are the irrational fears that we have that are keeping us in the in our Truman Show in the world? And I would say it's three. It's the fear of atomic weapons. It's the fear of tax man.
And it's the fear of viruses of these unpredictable, invisible, unprovable diseases that seem to just strike us like lightning. That's that's what we have to take on if we're going to get out of the Truman Show.
And here's the point. In the Truman Show, they had 30 people in the control room. They only had to control one guy and he got out. He figured it out. Now, how do you deal with a situation where you got over eight billion in the show and only maybe 300 ultimately in the control room?
They have their minions. I'm sure they're a lot more actually, but they're not eight billion. We outnumbered these guys, the people that are doing this to us.
So let's keep that in mind and realize that once we conquer our fears, we can get out of this.
Now, the first thing you've got to do if you've got to control a whole world of eight billion people, you've got to control the scientists.
You've got to you've got to get them on board and you know, and you've got to get people to believe in their science.
Now, I go around when I give talks to, you know, lay people, I always ask them, what do you what is this thing? And I'll get answers like, oh, it's a virus. It's SARS-CoV-2. Oh, it's that creepy spike protein.
Well, no, this is just CGI. It's not an electron micrograph. It's not reality. This is something NASA could have created for them. You know, it's completely false. It's a false picture.
OK, now, in on it, by contrast, this is real. These are my dryer balls. I could put my your eye out with these. I can prove they exist.
And this is what we have to get back to is we have to stop assuming that what we are being told and what we see is true. We have to start demanding rigorous proof.
Now, which one of these is a virus? OK, I can't even remember, but this is a real electron micrograph of a virus. Now, I understand I used to work in electron micrographic lab and I understand there's different techniques and all sorts of stuff.
But this is this is a one of these is a virus and one of these are exosomes. And the point I'm going to make is, is that.
We people are kind of sold when they tell you when you're told that you can see a virus under electron micrograph, they kind of think like bacteria.
People with a high school degree or college degree, they're used to thinking about bacteria and they can in their head, they can still see these images because we are controlled more by images and symbols and by words.
So they see these images of bacteria and paramecium and things moving around in a live microscope and a light microscope.
And they kind of conclude that that's the way it works in the end. But that isn't. E.M. is a black and white still life.
And now this is a little more advanced and there's different techniques here.
But they're telling you that exosomes, which look a lot like viruses, they claim that exosomes are little microscopic or submicroscopic genetic material, little bit of genetic material wrapped in a lipoprotein coating that goes out of the cell, binds with the membrane, goes out of the cell and doesn't hurt you.
But a virus is a little bit of genetic material wrapped in a lipoprotein coating that binds with the membrane of the cell and goes into the cell and wreaks havoc.
How do they know from a picture? Right. How did this is still life.
So this is like saying the guy standing outside the bank with a gym bag and you say he just robbed the bank. That gym bag's full of money.
Well, that may be true, but it also might be that he was just going in to make a deposit or he's really just going to the gym and it just got dirty tennis shoes in it.
You don't know from this. So when they say they see viruses on electron micrograph, let's just back up a minute.
This is actually the picture of COVID that is in the first paper done by the Chinese that we got the genome.
This is that one guy. They dipsticked one guy's lungs, took the bronchoalveolar lung fluid, and this is what they showed.
Now that wouldn't scare anybody. That's why they have to put these scary CGI images up, because that burns into your brain.
This is the part. This is the there's a constant psi-op, which I never trust me. I never believed any of this.
I never thought about this 20 years ago, but this is what's going on.
And the narrative that they get out of this is that there are these invisible particles that I breathe out that you breathe in and I can make you sick that way.
It's a great anti-human agenda. But is there actually proof for this? It turns out I don't think so.
I mean, I've been looking at this now for two years and it makes a good worldview for the overlords.
It's not how we get out of this. Now, one of the falsehoods here is the idea that you can isolate bacteria so you must be able to isolate viruses.
I can remember when I was 10 years old, my dad was a real scientist, and in my bedroom, he taught me how to we did we swab my nose.
We had Petri dish of sterile blood auger and we we created cultures and we made a pure.
He showed me how to isolate a bacterial culture, and it's very easy to do.
If you go on Duck Duck Go or Google and you search, how do you get a pure bacterial culture isolate?
It'll show you exactly the technique. And this is basically what you do.
And you transfer it. You pick one of those little dots there, which is where some bacteria grew in the Petri dish.
And then you swab it again on another Petri dish. And when it gets a pure color, so it's all one color, it all looks like the same kind of bacteria.
Then you look at it under a microscope. And if it looks like on the right, it's all the same. Boom. There you got it.
You've got now you could do genetic testing on it. OK, now try to look up Google how to isolate viruses and you'll get a bunch of gobbledygook.
You know, they just it very quickly. It doesn't show you anything like that.
There's nothing in the real world that they show you. What they what they show you is a bunch of parts.
And then it quickly becomes a computer generated algorithms.
Now, another thing you've got to have to co-opt the world, you've got to have front men.
And, you know, everybody knows who this guy is. Everybody knows Klaus Schwab.
He's you couldn't pick a better guy to keep out front to keep us distracted on him because he's just the epitome of, you know, Dr.
No or Dr. Evil. And he's a bond villain. Right. And when we weren't paying enough attention to him, we you know, we we were supposed to be watching him and not these other people.
What did they do? They put out the picture of him. I'm sorry to show you this on the beach.
And this burns into your brain so badly you just can't get it out of your mind. OK, well, I'm going to tell you that the same thing happens in medicine.
But anyway, here's who's this? I mean, again, there's the front man was Klaus Schwab. But who is this?
Very few people know that's Pepe Orsini. Now, Pepe Orsini is much more dangerous than Klaus Schwab.
He is the senior guy of the House of Orsini, a direct descendant of Julius Caesar. This is a black nobility.
We keep hearing about those families, the Astors and the Rothschilds. But those are actually kind of lower tier bloodline families. These are the real guys.
And my point is, is that if you look around, there's always something that they're pushing out on the media.
That's probably not what you should be looking for. You should be looking in the shadows. And the same is true in medicine.
OK, when you really go back and it took me a while to do this.
But when you really go back and you start looking at the history of virology, it starts with this guy, John Enders.
He got you know, he is he is the dude. Now, who is he? You know, he didn't he's not a self-made.
I mean, my dad had three doctorate degrees and he earned his way by working a road crew to get to get where he got and pawning this ring that I always wear and pawned that numerous times in his life.
Not John Enders. See, he's one of the family members, I suspect, because what he did was he he inherited 19 million dollars from when his father, I think, died.
And he went to Yale in 1922 and he became a member of the Skroll and Key Society.
Now, there's another one we all know about the Skoll and Bones Society, but I had never heard of Skroll and Key Society until I was looking into John Enders.
The Skroll and Key Society is really the secret society at Yale.
It's the big money society and it's more more exclusive than the Skroll than the than the Skoll and Bones Society.
Just saying. So he went to Yale and then he went to Harvard and he got a Ph.D. in in according to his biography.
And this is from the from two two sites. He got a Ph.D. in immunology and bacteriology in 1930.
Well, OK, along these lines of him maybe not being exactly who he says he is, you know, are there synthetically developed people for their roles?
They say in the Nobel Laureate, he was became a Nobel laureate, they say in the Nobel Laureate biography, they said in 1917, he left his studies there to become this is Yale at the time in 1918, a pilot in the US Air Force with a rank of ensign.
Wait a minute. I spent 10 years in the Navy. No Air Force guy gets a rank of ensign.
I mean, I just that may just be an error, but it's just not one that you should be making on a big thing like the biography of the Nobel Laureate.
And then he said, this is interesting. He said he got a supposed Ph.D. supposed to be in bacteriology and immunology in 1930.
I don't know. I'm not a university professor. Maybe it works this way.
But according to Harvard, they didn't have a Ph.D. in immunology until 1974.
It was created by Dr. Kuhns as the first chairman.
They said it was authorized by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences of Harvard University to grant a Ph.D. in immunology.
That was 1974. So it makes you wonder about who this guy really is.
But in any case, according to Wikipedia, he's the father of modern vaccines.
They don't even mention that he was a bacteriologist or whatever they say.
He was a biomedical scientist, Nobel laureate. He's been called the father of modern vaccines.
OK, but what did he do? This is what he did.
So he's in his lab one day with a medical student and somebody else that all became part of the I think the Nobel Peace Prize Award.
And they decide they're going to look at culturing viruses.
And just by accident, he said, and this is the way he writes it in the Nobel acceptance speech.
And the reason, by the way, I'm quoting that is because you can't get his original work.
It's all behind paywalls. If you can, if you're an institution, you can read it.
But those of us being victimized by this have no authority to read his papers in the original.
That's pretty sad. But in any case, he said, close at hand in the storage cabinet was the Lansing strain of poliomyelitis.
OK, so I wanted to go back and see where did you get the Lansing strain?
What is it? The Lansing strain of poliomyelitis virus.
And again, you can't get access to the articles.
Why do you think they need to put put paywalls around 1930s science articles?
Really? But it said in his speech that virus in the form of an infected suspension of mouse brain.
So what they're calling viruses really is just an infected suspension of mouse brain.
They didn't know what was in the system.
But they they had this goo. OK, they knew it was something that caused disease in other animals.
And then they then they took some of this and they put it in these blood tubes that roll.
They call roller tubes. And they said and then they saw the roller tubes starting to clot.
And they said, well, viral increase was easily followed by measuring the amount of hemagglutin.
In other words, they equated clotting with having viruses growing in there.
Again, they didn't see it. They couldn't test for it. They just made that assumption.
Now, then they took mice and they injected this stuff into mice.
Well, first they would. Sorry. First they put into monkey brains.
This is the unhappy looking monkey there.
They they first took this poliomyelitis mouse brain slurry and they put it into a monkey.
And then they they let it fester for a while and then they harvested it.
And by the time they got to the third monkey, voila, the monkey has flaccid paralysis of the legs.
And they conclude we've proven this has got poliomyelitis virus in it.
Does anybody see the problem with that?
I mean, you've just taken toxic junk from mice that you don't know.
And you've put it into brains of monkeys and moved them from monkey to monkey.
And then you've caused him to have weakness of his legs or flaccid paralysis.
And then you've caused him to have a problem with that.
And then you've caused him to have weakness of his legs or flaccid paralysis.
And now you're you're you're injecting stuff in the brain and you're wondering and you're concluding rather that that's a virus.
I can come to other conclusions about that.
And then then they took that stuff and they did.
They put it into mice and they showed that the longer that you cultured this stuff.
And then they took it out and they put it into human embryonic skin muscle tissue.
Wonder where they got that. But anyway, skin muscle tissue of human embryos.
And this is in the 1950s. Right.
And they they saw that the again, the tissue got cloudy.
And so that's why they knew they had virus growing in it.
Then they took this stuff and they put it in brains of mice and into other parts of the mice.
And they showed that, oh, they can they can damage the mice.
It grows all over. And they showed that it if the longer you you grew this stuff in in a in a petri dish or in a in a culture of skin and then put it into mice, the more deadly it was to the mouse.
So what they're calling a virus, I'm just making this point, this is very important.
What they're calling a mouse viral titer was actually just the LD 50 of the inoculate.
In other words, at what point, how much of stuff do you have to put in to kill the mouse?
And they're equating that with with viral titers.
Now, I don't tell this is not part of my lay talk, but I'm telling this to you guys who are physicians and scientists and stuff.
That's insane. You can't do that.
That's not proof of anything.
It's proof of toxic material can kill mice.
That's what it's proof of.
And this is just from the paper of his Nobel laureate paper.
It says, fortunately, signs of viral activity in the cultures themselves were observed soon after it was established that multiplication took place.
Examination of stained sections of fragments of human embryonic intestine and skin and muscle removed from the early suspended cell cultures of the Lansing strain revealed widespread cellular degeneration.
And that's Stefan Lankes, a modern virologist I'm going to mention.
He said that is essentially at the basis of their point that they equate the presence of virus with cellular degeneration.
And they showed that un-inoculated tissues maintained were under the same conditions were basically OK.
So and they also showed that, oh, surprisingly, this this didn't just they supposed to be poliomyelitis virus, but it didn't just affect nerves tells it actually grew better in other cells.
So, again, this is hard to buy.
But what happened is this very speculative paper then is never really criticized because they give a Nobel Prize to the guy who wrote it, to the guy who did the research.
That's what's happening.
And that gets us to the SARS-CoV-2.
And when you look at there's lots of ways you can look at this.
One of the things this is the paper from Nature where they got the lung fluid that became the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2.
And if you if you try and find any of those authors on that page, I can only find one.
And that's the last author, Zhang Lishi.
And she is the Bat Lady of Wuhan lab.
That's the only one I can I can verify.
Everybody else may exist, but you can't when you see all those little numbers, those are numbers.
If you're an American university and I look at number three, for example, or number one, it tells me you're the chief of microbiology at Caltech or someplace.
And then I can click on that.
It goes to you. It goes to a site.
I can find you.
There is nothing here you can find.
And I challenge anybody to do this.
Maybe I'm just not very good at it, but try it.
You'll be completely bored.
But I knew who Zhang Lishi was, so that was the only one I could find.
But I tried her the same way.
And she doesn't actually show up anymore in the place that she's listed there, number one.
But probably it's out there somewhere.
Anyway, how did they do it?
They basically dipstick these lungs with this lung goo with PCR tests.
They call them primers when they're used this way, but they put a bunch of PCR tests down in there.
And then each of these things were put into what's called the Illuminae sequencer.
They ran it through this program and it spit out 57 million genetic pieces, each 150 bases or less.
And then they put them into another algorithm, another computer, which then spit out a million possibilities for this virus.
And then they chose the one that they made into this vaccine.
And that's why it's called an in silico genome.
It's only exists on a computer or the consensus genome because they had to fill in holes.
That's what all the blue stuff is.
So there's something wrong with this whole process.
And this is what Stefan Lanko, who's much better at understanding this than I am.
He's done some absolutely beautiful work at looking at how you can get the exact same result on the electron microscope by not even inoculating the stuff into the petri dish.
You can just poison it with all the things you do to get it ready for the EM.
He says the basic insight is that these manipulations simply do not correspond to any complete or known genetic material of a virus.
If you remember Patrick King back in Alberta, when he got arrested in a crowd of 11, you can only have 10, according to the health minister.
And he challenged the health minister to produce an isolate of SARS-CoV-2 and she couldn't do it.
And then the CDC was challenged and they couldn't do it.
And 96 countries couldn't do it.
If this thing is possible to be proven, it should be able to be isolated.
How do you do genetic sequencing without isolation?
And that's the point. You're not.
Now, how did we accept all this?
In my opinion, if not a high school student, at least a college student in biology, if you really took a month of your life and you looked at this, you would conclude that this is smoke and mirrors.
But we accept the reality of the world with which we're presented.
It's as simple as that.
This is Ed Harris playing the director of The Truman Show.
Now, the other thing you'd have to do to take over the world of science is you'd have to take over scientific publishing.
Now, in World War II, the largest publishing house for medical and scientific information was Butterworth's.
And these two guys, Charles Galton Darwin, who's the grandson of Charles Darwin, the famous explorer and evolutionist, and Alexander Fleming, who discovered penicillin, they got together and they went to the British government.
And they said, you know, we really got hornswoggled of what happened with the Germans and even the Americans and the Japanese, all the stuff.
We didn't know what was going on scientifically around the world as we should.
So we need a more robust medical scientific publishing situation.
And what do you say?
And so the government of England, without even consulting any publishing houses, they said, no problem.
We could get together with Springer in Germany and we could make that happen.
Now, how could they do that?
Well, as it turns out, the British government already owned Buttersworth, but it wasn't the British government per se.
It was MI6, the British spy agency.
They were the owners of the largest medical scientific publishing house at the time of World War II.
I mean, this is kind of a shocker to me.
But in any case, they put it together with Springer and I think it's probably what we call Springer Verlag now, but it became Pergamon initially.
And this is who they made their first editor in chief, intelligence officer Robert Maxwell.
Intelligence officer Robert Maxwell worked for the British against the Germans, but also he's buried on the Mount of Olives, so is presumably a Mossad agent.
And the only scientific guy, I mean, they did have Paul Rosebud, who was a metallurgist and was a spy for the British in World War II as well.
But at least he had scientific background.
So he's the scientific advisor.
But who you probably know the name Robert Maxwell because he's the father of Ghislaine Maxwell, the pedophile consort of pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
I mean, and then if you wonder why, why, you know, like the Broward County chief of police says you never have a good pedophile case in Broward County without the Disney people being involved.
Well, it turns out that Iger, the CEO of Disney, named his son Robert Maxwell Iger because they're best buddies.
I mean, it just reminds me of George Carlin's point that this is a big club, but we ain't in it.
It's really unbelievable how this all how this all weaves together.
The people that are involved in one thing are also the people involved in other things, including taking over scientific publishing.
So if you wonder why you can't get things published, this is why it clearly is a it's being run by the intelligence services, just like Project Mockingbird took over the TV studios.
Right.
The CIA set up shop next to the TV studios and then became the people running the TV studios.
Well, here's another point.
They told us right away.
If you want to find out what's going on with the disease, the first thing you should do right is autopsies.
But what did they tell us?
They said don't do autopsies that you can't you know, you might spread the disease.
And now, interestingly, I met one of the embalmers who's been showing these big clots.
He actually gave me a sample, this big white rubbery cloth stuff.
And it's and I realized that although he although they told pathologists not to do pathology because the autopsies might spread the disease, they still let the embalmers and all those people deal with the dead covid victims.
So they didn't care about that.
It's it's you see what I'm saying.
It's a double complete double standard because they didn't expect the embalmers to find things that would lead to questions.
But they did expect the pathologist to find this.
Well, finally, a group of pathology experts, they they looked at all the pathology that had been done on dead covid patients to that date.
And they said when they did a meta analysis, they looked at three hundred and forty one cases.
And this was their conclusion.
This is this is in June of twenty twenty one.
They said, despite attention to an investment in quantifying global burdens of disease, the diagnosis in the majority of covid-19 related deaths currently remain unclear.
OK, now let's think about this.
This is after we'd been vaccinated, masked, shut down, put together in, you know, told we couldn't go to church.
We couldn't sing in church.
We couldn't group in more than 10 people, couldn't have a Christmas party.
Are you kidding me?
Couldn't go to funerals.
So really, as Elon Musk would say, let that sink in.
And then here's your friend James Diardano, who, you know, brain science from bench to battlefield.
And he says the brain is the new battlefield.
But here's what he also said.
He said, you don't need a disease to disable a population.
You can disable a population simply by fear of a disease.
Now, I'm not saying that's completely what happened, but fear was a big part of this irrational fear by not just the lay public.
But by physicians and people that should have known better.
Now, here's what I think we really need to pay attention to.
OK, I'm not, you know, the there's a lot that I can say.
And then let me just back up and say one thing.
You know, years ago, after I did a spine fellowship and I was out of all my training and out of the Navy, I was in my ex-husband at the time.
He was a colonel in the Marine Corps station at the Pentagon, and I served on the NRAC, the Navy Research Advisory Committee.
We looked at future technology for the Naval services.
And I literally met sitting in a vault with the captains of the military industrial complex because by law, this subcommittee had to have a doctor on it.
And I was it for like four years.
Well, at the time, I mean, I didn't have a lot to contribute to standard warfare discussions, you know, Kilo class submarines, et cetera.
So I decided to study, you know, medical and I mean, biologic and chemical warfare.
And I can just tell you, just looking around the world at what's happening in various things like these Ukrainian bioweapons labs, we bought those labs in 1991.
This was the Nunn-Lugar Act.
We bought these labs in 1991.
We sent our people over to run them and we sent them over with three things that we told them to do.
Get the labs up to current standards, produce, do vaccine research and to gain a function research.
And by the way, this wasn't just Ukraine.
This was in Kazakhstan and Georgia and all these different places.
In fact, the Georgian lab was named the Luger lab.
So when you see the Congress up there, bloviating about trying to investigate, oh, we didn't know about these labs.
Yes, they did.
They were sending the bio-weaponers W-2 forms for 30 years.
So there's so much that the military is doing and so much that our government is doing.
And now they're trying to gaslight us and tell us they're not doing it.
And this is one of them.
You know, one of the big things is we've got all these people and the hardest people to convince are people who are like electrical engineers.
My son is and my husband, current husband is.
I mean, these these guys live in the macro world and they don't realize what they don't realize what how it differs in the in the biologic world.
And I'm going to try and explain some of that because I think this is where the money is.
And what happened during Covid?
What happened is they put up they shut us into our houses and then they put up all these towers and they put them around schools.
And this is an incredibly important point to be made when we're now seeing these children in China that are having this white lung disease, this new disease coming out in China.
And now it's in, I think, the Netherlands.
And they can tell you it's mycoplasma and all this kind of stuff.
But here's the question.
If it's mycoplasma, why aren't adults being damaged?
Because that's that, you know, it's adults are usually the people that go down because their immune systems are not as good.
Why is it children?
Well, the one thing I can say is that children, if they're going to schools and if in China and in Europe, they put these 5G towers around schools like they have in America, then that would make a difference.
And that and the children are going to be getting more damage than the adults, because otherwise, this just doesn't make sense.
Or it's just unless it's all a sigh of.
Now, the first thing that the electrical engineers will tell you, oh, that 5G, you know, you guys worried about 5G.
That's just nonsense.
Well, OK.
But I was called up for Desert Storm.
And trust me, we had these poppers in the Iraq War.
They were denial of access weapons, and they basically were using fifth generation 5G doesn't mean gigahertz.
It means generation electromagnetic beams.
And they were they were the wavelength was targeting your hair follicle.
So what happened is as you, you know, your hair follicles helical.
And so it would the wavelength that they chose resonated with that helical structure.
And I remember this marine that got into the beam one time in Baghdad or somewhere.
And he said, you could not stand there.
It just made you feel like the your hair, your whole body was on fire.
So it was not a killer kill weapon.
It was used as a denial of access weapon.
But to say that we don't have 5G weapons is just nonsense.
We know we do.
And we know also the people that say there's no there's no there's no scientific literature about this.
Let me tell you, Arthur Furstenberg has a volume.
I mean, he has a volume of it.
And I've got I've got another source that's just got just tons of of papers that have been published about this five about the risk of 5G.
But one of the ones that I just remember is when they put mice in a 5G environment and they turned on the EMF after five days,
their immune cells diminished by 50 percent.
Now, when they got them out of the environment, it came back.
This is a review article, but it's just to show you that there are articles out there.
The immune system came back in these mice.
But how long do you have to be in before they don't come back?
Does anybody know?
You know, the I'm just saying that the idea that we don't know that there are problems is false.
And here's why there are problems.
Now, I haven't heard anybody else saying this.
This is my thinking based on looking at how we work.
We are electromagnetic beings.
OK. And the way we make energy is exactly the way that you make energy at Grand Coulee Dam.
Grand Coulee Dam has a water, high water to low water gradient.
So that water drops over the dam with power.
It pushes these turbines that are connected to little generators that give you electricity in the human body.
We do the same thing.
But instead of water, we have here's the here's the mitochondria analysis, a CGI image, but the mitochondrial membrane.
So in your cells, every cell in the body has mitochondria.
They're little powerhouses.
This is how we make our power.
Just like we have a million Grand Coulee Dams in every cell.
Well, there's a protein complex in the middle of that membrane and it operates just like Grand Coulee Dam with little turbines.
And here's a little video if I can get it to play.
There you go.
And they're showing instead of water, which you have as hydrogen ions coming across this membrane, there's a gradient.
So you have high numbers of positive charges on one side of the gradient and low numbers on the other.
And that's what turns these turbines.
And this is very well documented and worked out.
It also explains why deuterium water is harmful to you because deuterium is is is an isotope of hydrogen.
It's much bigger.
And when it hits these little turbines, it damages the blades, literally just like Grand Coulee Dam, having a rock come over it.
So this is this is not speculative, but this is how we make power.
Now, why is this important?
When you walk into an electromagnetic field and it equalizes the charges across that membrane, you can't make power.
And if you can't make power, you can't expel toxins and you get sick and die.
But the first thing that happens before you get too sick is you could develop diabetes because this is how you manage your your glucose.
Right. With this power generation.
And what happened? Here's proof of that, in my opinion, or it's a substantiating evidence, I'll say.
Thomas Edison and Alexander Graham Bell, two people that lived in an age when, number one, there was very little diabetes.
It was a reportable disease in the eighteen hundreds.
And number two, they were in they lived in a world that was not electrified.
And suddenly they go into their labs and they're in labs that are filled with electromagnetic all around them.
And they both develop diabetes. OK, that's that's that's just history.
I mean, that that is and this is how it happens.
There was and I can't remember. I keep meaning to look up the country.
It wasn't it wasn't Nepal, but I think it was Bhutan or something.
It was one of these little countries way up in the Himalayas.
It was totally unelectrified till about nineteen ninety five.
And then in nineteen ninety five, roughly they got a they got a grant from the government.
They electrified the country all at once.
They had the highest increased rate of diabetes in the world.
Now, there's another reason that electromagnetic frequency bothers you.
And that is these ion gated or these voltage gated ion channels.
So your nerves everywhere and like the conduction system for your heart, your nerves and lots of other things in cellular function have to do with the fact that when you have a certain voltage around you, you you open up these gates and and sodium or potassium or calcium or these things flow into cells.
OK, now, what it does when it flows into your cell, when you have too much calcium in your cells, you get jittery.
Right. There's a lot of evidence about the that's what hypercalcemia does.
But we knew about the electromagnetic thing from the eighteen fifties because they called it telegraphers disease.
We did not have a yearly flu problem until they laid down the telegram line.
And in the eighteen fifties, when they started laying down these telegram lines, people started getting sick under the lines.
There were the engineers, the anybody that was working with are not just the telegram operators, but in further evidence that this was what was causing it is when they they figured out if they took a very long twist in the copper line that the symptoms went down.
They may not gone away, but they went down.
So that was called telegraphers disease.
That was well known in the eighteen hundreds.
Well, we also came up in the eighteen hundreds with a disease called neurasthenia and neurasthenia was a nervous condition that was diagnosed in Boston.
And what? And it was mostly in women.
You got nervous, you got depressed, you had, you know, kind of having the vapors, kind of the old terms.
Well, here's a picture of Boston in the eighteen hundreds.
That's what was happening is so the body responds to rate of change is Cannon's law of the body.
If if you go into a situation slowly, you can somewhat adapt to it.
Now we cannot completely adapt to what's happening with this EMF, but you can slowly.
You're better off with slow adaptation.
But people that when this happened, very suddenly, it was a problem.
And this explains influenza.
I'm just going to tell you, I on my website, I have a huge thing I wrote about influenza of nineteen eighteen.
It was not a virus pandemic.
It was an electromagnetic disease magnified by vaccines and a bad drug.
Sounds a lot like today. Right.
Three things. Bad drug vaccines and electromagnetism.
But but the two astronomers, one in Oxford, England and one in Winnipeg, they they they figured out that the the flu seasons that happened before we had, you know, a lot of a lot of flu before it became yearly.
These pandemics would happen at times of solar flaring.
So sunspot cycles were related to pandemics.
Now, why would that be true?
Because when the sun is very active, it charges our ionosphere and we have this in this decreased charge gradient in our ability to produce energy.
We can't get rid of toxins and we get sick.
So that is what's going on.
And if you look back, H1N1, that was when we first had the cell phones on our hips.
You know, all of these recent pandemics have also been due to sudden increases in the EMF milieu.
Now, even before eighteen hundreds, they knew about this.
OK, they didn't know what was causing it.
But it turns out that from, you know, we have good records from like the British Admiralty and places like that.
And they were they were following these sailors and all over the world in these ships.
And they can tell you that in the in the days before telegrams, we didn't have a yearly flu season.
They would come out maybe every decade or every 30 years.
They would have an outbreak.
It wasn't every year.
And but when it would break out, it would break out all over the world simultaneously.
I mean, the Navy joke in the age of wooden ships and Iron Men, you could not travel that fast to spread a virus around the world in a day.
But that's the way influenza would break out.
And the one person that actually figured this out, believe it or not, was Helen Blavatsky, the famous theosophist that everybody loves to hate.
But she said, this is not like any other disease.
It has to be cosmological.
And she was exactly right.
So what happened is, I mean, the British Admiralty can show you that these ships would get sick at sea that were not ever near land.
And they got sick at the same time that somebody in Australia got sick and somebody in midtown London got sick, that it was this worldwide pandemic would happen.
But it was because of the sunspot cycle.
So electromagnetic changes suddenly make a big difference.
Now, let me back up and say something about 1918.
What was why when the interesting observation that was made by the doctors that when they when the kids went down, when these young men came to the war,
the Spanish flu didn't start in Spain.
It started in Fort Riley, Kansas.
And it was people going down to be trained to go over the World War I in Europe.
And they got sick, but they didn't die.
They weren't, you know, they weren't.
Well, let me back up.
They got they got sick and they were also vaccinated.
So they got two things happen to them.
When they first came down there, they started getting sick and they get this lung problem.
And what were they being trained to do?
They were trained to be telegram operators to go over to Europe.
But it's when they got the vaccines that they died.
And I'll just say that if you want to read about that, the poison needle by Eleanor McBean, she was a family.
She was a child and her family, church family would go around and lots of their other people in the church that were not vaccinated, they would go around and they would try and, you know,
tend and help these young men that didn't have any families near them on the base.
And they and people, some of the people out in town that got this.
And they found out that that none of them in their church got even a sniffle.
And she she said the people that died were the people that were vaccinated.
So to me, by the way, 2020 looks a lot like 20 1918 Redux.
Now, how does this explain flu?
Well, it turns out that virus in Latin means poison.
OK, we all have toxins that get into the body.
How do we get the toxins out of our body?
Toxin or poison? How do we get it out of our body?
Well, this is from the work of Dr. Pollock at the University of Washington.
And what he showed was that in every cell of your body, you have a battery, you essentially have charge separation.
You have a positive and a negative side.
And to get toxins out of your cell, you put charges around the toxin and you you expel it.
Just like if anybody works in a lab, it's how you do protein electrophoresis.
You can push things out of this protein gel in your cells with charges.
Now, what he also discovered was that sunlight increases your charge.
It actually charges your batteries.
So when grandma would say to you years ago, oh, you need some rest because your batteries are getting too low.
She was right. You know, we actually have a battery system in our in our body.
And this is another thing that medical school lied to us.
Maybe they didn't know it back then, but they told us you're not plants.
You don't get any direct energy from the sun. But that's not true.
It turns out that the way you charge that system is with infrared and near infrared.
So when you go outside in the summer, you just suck this stuff up.
You're out in shorts and play in tennis or farming or whatever.
And you can work long hours and you don't get sick.
There's no flu season in the summer generally.
So what happens in the winter? Well, now we all get bundled up.
We come in and we start getting our batteries discharged.
We can't get rid of the toxins as well. And what else do we do in the winter?
Well, we have holidays and we eat too much and we drink too much and we travel and we get run down at a time.
We're not able to discharge our toxins.
Another thing we're doing, if you have a gel and like let's think about jello and think about flecks of pepper that have been hardened into the jello.
If I wanted to get those out, what would be the first thing I would do? I would melt the jello. Right.
That's why fever is an adaptive behavior.
You should have a fever when you get sick to get rid of these toxins out of your cell.
But what do they do? What have they trained every doctor to do in every emergency room?
The minute somebody comes in with a fever, give them Moltrum.
Give them, God help us, Tylenol.
Give them these toxic substances and it stops your ability to help push out these toxins.
In other words, you know, I don't think our medical community can have made so many mistakes by random.
This is a coordinated effort of miseducation by misunderstanding the way the world works.
So essentially who dies from flu?
It's people that have a bad immune system, their battery charge is low and they've got increased toxins.
You know, when you get on, let's say, you know, and I'm guilty of this.
You go on, you go to a meeting and it's in the middle of winter, say, and I get on a plane and I go to Florida for the meeting.
But I get on this plane. I don't sleep well the night before because I just don't like to fly.
So I'm not feeling so good. I sit on the plane.
They've just they've just decontaminated theoretically this plane with all these toxic substances.
And then you have to breathe this in recycled for the four hour flight.
And then you get down to your destination and you meet your buddies that you haven't seen from residency for 10 years.
So you go out drinking and eating and you stay up late.
And then the next day you've got to get up early and go to the meeting and you do this for a couple of days and you get sick.
And you blame it on the guy on the plane coughing.
It doesn't work that way. This is just nonsense.
Once you understand how this works, I'm going to tell you in my own life, you can solve this.
You don't have to keep getting sick. There's some things we can do.
And this is why it's so important that we change our worldview.
Oops. Sorry. And it's interesting, too.
As I said, in by an ancient Latin virus didn't mean German, a poison or toxin.
But it's also interesting about the use of our profession.
Hippocrates, who was, I think, a real guy.
I mean, Aristotle and others in his that generation referred to him as a real individual.
So I don't think he's just a myth. But the Hippocratic Oath, interestingly, one of the first things it says is you don't poison anybody and don't take money from somebody else.
Don't be hired to be a poisoner. Now, if that weren't a problem, I don't think it would be in the oath.
So it's interesting. Now, where does this go? OK.
The other thing that I ran into and one of my other than being on the N-Rank and looking at bio weapons over a number of years, I will tell you one of the benefits.
I don't speak Russian, but I can read it enough to work my way through the literature.
And these two guys, you cannot read their stuff in English.
You can see a picture of Kaznachev, but Kaznachev and Gurvich were these two Russian scientists in Novosibirsk, I think in the 20s or 30s.
And here's what they showed. They showed that if you take cells that are and you poison them and you have near right next to them, you have other cells that were not poisoned, that these poison cells as they die will give off some kind of energetic ray and it will cause the nearby cells to die of the same kind of disease.
So let's say I and let's say I radiate cell side a well, then it will then side B will die of the radiation poisoning.
If I put arsenic on side a side B will tide of arsenic type poisoning.
But what they also discovered this was Kaznachev.
He showed if you put a window glass between them, nothing happens to side B.
But if I put quartz as in between them, it will happen.
And what's the difference? Quartz will allow UV radiation through the ultraviolet and window glass will not.
Now, this explains why you have to have chicken pox parties.
It explains lots of things that we see in medicine that you don't have to have a virus to have disease at a distance, but it's got to be a very close distance.
So, but here's the other problem with this.
Now, we got two other scientists and these guys looked at what happens in bioactive big molecules like DNA and immunoclobulin.
And they showed that if you put these molecules in water and then you dilute them out, they're not completely gone because they leave behind an electromagnetic signature.
And you can capture that signature and project it at a distance and get the effect of the molecule.
So to put that all together, that sounds kind of complicated, but let's put it all together.
Now, what I've set up to now, I can back with facts.
What I'm saying now is my speculation.
What if I captured the death photons, the electromagnetic signature of these death photons, I poisoned some cells and I captured the electromagnetic signature and then I projected it.
OK, now, what are we what are we made of water?
So we know from the work of Luke Montagnier and Jacques de Vinci that water takes up and has the effect on the water of the molecule that you just captured the signature of.
And if they captured good things, what if I capture bad things?
You see, I can project it and I can make people sick at a distance.
And I would tell you, you don't need to.
You can get sick just from EMF, but I suspect this is where it goes.
I suspect this is the next step.
This is EMF on steroids where I can actually project a certain death death ray.
Now, here's the other thing.
And again, this is I've had I had the discussion on Lindell TV with an electric with electrical engineer.
But I think he backed off when I told him what he said.
Oh, this is nonsense.
Putting 5G towers on water is not going to hurt the water because it's not going to get through the metal thing and you're not going to even feel a field at the bottom.
And I said, it's not about transmission.
It's about resonance.
OK, this is the scariest thing I've ever seen.
And we have going up on water towers around even rural Iowa and Nebraska.
So you put the 5G resonators on these water towers.
What could that lead to?
Well, you can we know that there are frequencies that are good for water and bad for water.
This is the work of Dr.
Imoto and other people that have shown that crystal patterns and that are completely what I want to say discordant.
They're not they're ugly crystals when you when you shout at the water, when you project certain bad frequencies, but good frequencies will project these beautiful patterns.
And this is an example.
This is cymatic plates on the right.
And they're projecting this one at 1021 Hertz, the one two on the left there and compare that to the tortoise.
OK, it's the same pattern.
The tortoise has taken in the electromagnetic resonance, that frequency and incorporate into his biologic existence.
So if people don't realize the problem of contaminating our water with bad frequencies, to me, this is the picture that tells.
Now, this is another one that is absolutely provable.
If you if you look in the basic science literature, it's all they're all talking about optogenetics and what optogenetics is, is you find a chemical.
They've hybridized these options.
That's a light sensitive chemical and they've hybridized bacterial and mammal options.
And they put them then into a mouse and then they beam a wavelength at the mouse and they can change his his brain function.
And they can change the rhythm of his heart.
And what they say in all this literature is it provides high spatio temporal resolution to precisely switch on a particular circuitry in the brain.
And it's true of the heart, too. They can literally map the heart with this technology.
This is scary stuff.
Now, it turns out the reason I even stumbled on optogenetics is that I kept hearing about CRISPR.
But when I looked up the guy who's supposedly the father of CRISPR, Feng Zhang at the MIT lab, he says, well, you know, when it comes to genetic manipulation, we really can't do precise gene insertion.
We can do gene knockdown, which I'm sure they did.
But we can't do genetic insertion the way they're saying.
And I'm thinking, wait a minute, he's supposed to be the father of CRISPR.
What was his Ph.D. in? It was in optogenetics.
OK, big guy at MIT. Now, why is this important?
OK, remember the Travis Scott concert?
Or maybe you don't. I mean, I'm not a rap person. I don't go to rap concerts.
And I suspect you guys didn't either.
But this was a famous concert in Texas not too long ago.
These are young people. They're presumably healthy.
All of them had to be vaccinated to go to the concert.
And then when they get to the concert, they have to walk through this kind of satanic looking skull mouth to get into the concert.
They have strobe lights beamed at them.
And then they get in the concert.
There's all these wavelengths that they're experiencing.
And what happened? Well, about 14 or 15 people just dropped over.
I mean, I tried to find as many firsthand accounts as I could.
And it wasn't a crush scene like they wanted to tell you on the news.
This was they it was a crushing happen after they dropped and they didn't have room to do CPR.
But most of those people died, apparently.
I couldn't follow everybody, but most of them seem to have died.
But one guy said he survived it.
He said it felt like they stopped my heart or felt like my heart stopped.
And that's exactly what I think happened.
This is it. You know, they always talk about the CIA heart attack gun.
Well, this is it. All you have to do is give people a certain option.
And they claim they've never done it in humans, but they can show you this absolutely in mice.
Like I say, it's so precise they can map the heart by causing arrhythmias all over the mouse's heart.
I'm sure they can do this. So I think personally, this was a test.
Now, here's the good news that we have a way out of the Truman show.
Truman figures out that there's a way out.
And, you know, after 30 years, he finds the stairs, he finds the door.
And now the people in the control center are just kind of going bat shit crazy up there thinking, oh, my God, can he really leave?
What happens? Can Truman leave the show?
And this is what Ed Harris, the director, said.
He says he's always been able to leave. He just didn't know it.
And I think that's us right now in 2023.
We are able to leave, but we can't leave with our fears intact.
We cannot keep being afraid of irrational fears, in my opinion, of disease that we know how to, I think, prevent.
And, you know, the nuclear stuff's another lecture.
But, you know, all the stuff that they've got us afraid of is keeping us in this show, not the least of which is the tax man.
So here's how we got to do. We got to get out of this idea of the enabling lie, just like they had the enabling acts for Hitler.
This is the enabling lie for this whole thing.
Viral transmission. And I just challenge people that don't that still want to believe in viruses.
You're welcome to approve it to me, though. Show me the proof, because I can't find it.
And it's all smoke and mirrors and transmission.
I have four generations of doctors books in my library at home.
And I thought I would have to go way back to find when they didn't talk about viruses, when they were discussing disease transmission.
And no, it turned out it was my own books in the late 70s.
I think Mandel and Douglas and Bennett, I think, was the three guys that wrote the book of two volumes on infectious disease.
And I looked up viral or I looked up transmission of disease and they were they used as a model parasites, not viruses.
So that was very interesting. The virus thing has come about since vaccines were profitable.
So if we don't get rid of the virus falsehood, we are going to play disease whack-a-mole for the rest of our existence.
And that we're going to lurch from one made up disease to another monkey pox, monkey pox.
You know, what are pox? What are what are blisters and rashes?
They're the bodies trying to get rid of toxins. And it's kind of a when that happens, it's just a rapid toxicity.
They got to get rid of fast. So that's one of the fastest way they can do it.
There are also ways you can get rid of toxins. You can poop it out, pee it out.
You usually don't pee it out, poop it out, sweat it out, cough it out, and you can get it out through your skin.
And then all these things, HIV and AIDS, Luc Montagnier, weeks before he was to receive the Nobel Laureate for Discovering the Virus that Caused AIDS,
he says, whoops, I made a mistake. That's not what does it.
And then they had to give it to him anyway, probably with a tight jaw. But all these different things.
An interesting Marburg. Now we're being told, oh, Marburg, what about Marburg? Robert Malone wants to put that Marburg.
Well, you know, Marburg Lab was the one lab I could find that took the work in the 1930s of the of Kazanachev and Gurvich and was looking at it.
There's the evidence for Marburg being a viral disease is I will say less than zero.
I mean, if you I've looked at every case up until modern before twenty twenty when they started manipulating the numbers, there were there were only a few hundred cases of Marburg.
And they were all in either bio weapon nears or two groups of of gold or lithium miners, gold miners.
I think they were in in Africa in areas like Angola and the Congo. Now they took out the miners, but not their families, not the cities.
What? Don't tell me that's an airborne virus. So there's all this stuff.
It's just we can't keep we can't keep assuming that these guys know what they're doing that are doing this.
Now, what if I told you that multiple sclerosis, throat cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and acne rosacea all could be treated with anti parasitic medication?
You know, we I'm a spine surgeon for years.
I would do neurologic examinations and workups on people that were sent to me thinking it was a spine, but I kind of didn't think so.
And I'd work up for like MS. And how do we make the diagnosis of MS?
We make the diagnosis because we get an MRI of the brain and the spinal cord.
And then we look and then the radiologist says there are plaques in the brain, plaques in the spinal cord.
That's MS. But we never asked, what are those plaques?
Well, it turns out that Dr. McDonald, a pathologist, did a series of 10 MS patients, dead MS patients, and 100 percent of them had parasites in the brain and spinal cord that corresponded to those plaques.
So we are not looking WNL.
It's supposed to be within normal limits.
No, in medicine, it means we never looked.
And same thing.
I know I know multiple people that have cured their cancer with anti parasitic medication.
There's a whole big site on this on the website.
Rheumatoid arthritis, acne rosacea.
I can tell you these things can can be treated this way.
So and and what about polio and dementia, neuropathy, Guillain-Barre?
Well, it turns out let's start looking at toxins.
Polio turns out to be most likely.
I believe this is the truth.
It's not an again, it's not an airborne virus.
It never was.
It happened to children in the city in the summer.
But they're always telling us about flu.
Well, we get you get viruses in the winter because you're all all together sitting in the home and you don't get out in fresh sunlight.
What then?
Why does polio happen in the summer?
Because that's when they were spraying toxic neurotoxic insecticides in the cities.
And that corresponds to the polio outbreaks.
And there's a lot of it.
I never saw a case.
I studied neurology at the Queen Square Institute in London.
I never saw a case of Guillain-Barre over there in the 1970s.
And that's an 800 bed hospital just in nothing but but neurologic patients.
In fact, I never took care of a case of Guillain-Barre until covid.
But Guillain-Barre is ascending paralysis.
And it's it's it's it's related like it's the number one reason for payout in the in the American Board Government Board for paying vaccine victims is for influenza vaccine induced Guillain-Barre.
So I think we're going to find that we have to change our thinking from an airborne disease to becoming toxic.
How do we keep from becoming toxic?
And here's the thing.
I mean, I think we know a lot about this.
We have we have to we have to take care of our nutritional deficiencies again.
You know, I'm a spine surgeon and I would see women coming in with this kind of look on their on their bones.
And that's not the look of osteoporosis has always got diagnosed as osteoporosis, but that's osteomalacia.
That's rickets.
That's vitamin D insufficiency.
I always put people on 10,000 units a day.
That's what you need for good bone.
But guess what?
The Institute of Medicine was giving them 400 units a day.
And they said anything else is nonsense.
Well, and this is at a time that mainstream orthopedics was saying, you know, the lead Joseph Lane, the biggest guy probably in bone health was saying 10,000 units a day.
Can they really be wrong by accident about all this stuff?
Why didn't they want us to have vitamin D?
And then we know about EMF causes can cause a lot of things.
The real question is this.
They've given us 70,000 diagnoses reasons to be afraid.
Do we really have 70,000 diseases or do we have a few diseases?
I mean, we have 70,000 presentations of a few real root causes and we have to get back at root causes.
I think parasites are an unsung root cause to so many things.
And this is my personal program.
I mean, you can't get right with God was an ancient program and they would detoxify.
Those are the only two things that the ancients knew at the time of Hippocrates, a good diet and eliminate toxins and spiritual wellness.
But now I think we can add some things we need to eliminate parasites that they've they've they've they know it because they're doing research on parasites and cancer.
But they don't want us to know it.
And parasites and all these different things, EMF protection, clean diet, sunlight activity.
And the other thing I'll just say is we cannot comply our way out of tyranny.
Every I see a bad thing happening even in the medical freedom community where people are getting entrapped because they take money from people and they take safety from people that are not good people.
If it looks if it's if the program you're being asked to join sounds too good to be true, it probably is too good to be true.
Don't go with it. And and enough said, I guess, on that.
And then ultimately we have to smile and have fun and love and hug and make memes because I think the people that we're dealing with, they don't have a sense of humor.
And I get I put this up one time and somebody gave me a hard time about the reptilians.
But come on now, I think it's pretty funny and might be true.
And this and thank you very much. That's really my talk. I'll answer questions.
Wonderful. Wonderful.
If you could stop your share now so we can get beautiful.
Great job. Wonderful, wonderful survey.
I took heaps of notes and Lee, while Stephen Frost is gathering his thoughts for the first 15 minutes of questions, I want to bring to your attention.
The headline in the News Corp Murdoch Press on Saturday.
Can you say that? Yep. Yep.
The diabetes disaster. Yeah.
Huge three full pages of the Broad Street newspaper front page.
And so and so I save this because this whole issue of, you know, they say they say hospitals are overwhelmed.
Well, I certainly are overwhelmed because nurses have all left the profession.
So all sorts of wards are shut in Australia as they are in America.
So the wards are available.
But certainly, EMFs and diabetes, everybody, please take a note of that on top of the crap that people put into their bodies.
The other issue on the other issue on toxins, Lee, is the number of synthetic chemicals that wonderful book, Slow Death by Rubber Duck.
I'm sure you've seen it with actually I haven't, but I think I love the title.
Yes, it's a free download. Someone will have the download.
Someone will have the download in it's now it's a PDF was written by two Australian to Australian researchers who wanted to work out what their children, what their baby, what their children were eating when they were chewing on these rubber ducks.
And the number now is there are 85,000 synthetic chemicals that have been put together by humanity.
Less than 5% have been tested for safety.
And so this toxicity issue that you're raising is so relevant.
And this was booking 2012. So your presentation ties in beautifully with that.
Now, Stephen Frost, are you there before we get to John Lookarch?
Yeah, I'm here. Yeah, sorry.
Show us your face. So, so there you look there is Lee, he exists.
Yeah, hi, Lee. Hi.
Sorry about the email. Yeah, it was a bit mixed up. Yeah, I still get emails from Daria, like half an hour ago.
Half an hour before the meeting started.
Lee, thank you so much for speaking to us.
So, you are, I just want to make it clear to the audience knows but the people watching the videos afterwards might not have appreciated that you're a medical doctor.
And so I've been trying to tell people so, you know, I.
So I've been saying that actually the no virus crowd you know that maybe that's something we can look into.
But the point that the public understand is and I just want to know what you feel.
Can you be absolutely clear that there was no pandemic because that's my feeling.
Well, I wouldn't. Well, there was a pandemic of fear that led to an outbreak of vaccination that killed a bunch of people. So that's the pandemic.
But the disease, but I do believe I mean, and this is just me. Okay, I'll just tell you from looking at knowing the history, knowing some things that we that the bioweapons community has been working on finding some patents through Karen Kingston and other people.
I will just say, I think it does not make sense that there was an airborne virus in Wuhan that started all this that that I just disagree with.
And if it had, why didn't it go to Yanjo and Wanjo and Shanghai and, you know, all these different towns, it really kind of blossomed and died in Wuhan.
And then it very discreetly went to Lombardy and then to New York. If you look in America, like in my state along the interstate 80, there were discreet areas that almost were like somebody went 60 between every 60 miles and put something because that was where the severe outbreaks were.
I mean, it's not right. If it were I heard initially when I was following this and I had a friend that had worked at the Fort Detrick bioweapons lab, by the way, and I called him up in December of 2019.
And I said, should I be watching this is about December 10 or something. I said, should I be watching this thing in China? He said, yeah, you better. And always before he said no. But this time he said yes.
Now, interestingly, too, when I started talking about on a private email with people from all over doctors from all around the world and I and they were at first there were only like 15 of us. There got to be a lot of people.
But at first there was just a small number. I kept saying, you know, I've looked at the rush and the Russians are saying this is a bioweapon. I think this is a bioweapon. This doesn't make sense.
If the epidemiologist and he came back and said on a private email said, I think you should be quiet about that. And I thought, well, that's kind of interesting. That got my ears pierced up.
But essentially, I think there's evidence. You know, we have like there's a video and I think Epic Times has of this woman going into a into a computer store. She opens up the computers, touches all the keys, shuts them, opens, touches, shuts them open.
But she's not looking at this. She's not looking at any factors in the computer. Right. What's that all about?
Well, there's a stuff called smart hydrogel and it's one of the things that that DARPA worked on a lot of people and you can make a toxic.
One of the things that we are very adept at and have been working on for years, the Americans don't claim that they were involved with this.
But we know that we were sending we had Larry Ford. I'll name names. He's dead now.
But Larry Ford was a doctor in Los Angeles that was going to South Africa and working on contact bioweapons with the South African Defense Force.
So we're contact weapons are very well known.
And if you look at the kind of the history of bioweaponry, the Russians, the Soviets, I should say, and we all this aerosol work, it just didn't seem to ever pan out.
They were spending lots of money. But then they started looking at more of this stuff.
And I think what happened is this was some kind of tactile contact stuff.
And if it's smart hydrogel, what would happen is you could get it into you, but it wouldn't make you sick right away.
Because this has to do with ligands and into your ACE two pathway and maybe your nicotinic pathway.
But what happens is you would get it absorbed. And then the day you turn on, then this is the optogenetic point.
You turn on the 5G. And now this this this this hydrogel, instead of being I think there's two shapes of it in the patents.
There's this triangle shape and a diamond shape instead of instead of not.
First, it doesn't fit the receptor in the body that it needs to to make you sick.
But then you turn on a certain wavelength and it goes like this.
And now it hits the ACE two pathway or the whatever pathway is going to the nicotinic pathway.
And now it makes you really sick. And one of the things in favor of that is that not everybody see a lot of people that were getting sick that we called Colbert.
And as I showed you, the Colbert tests are completely meaningless. They were made up.
And in my opinion, they were testing to our own genome. And I think they still are.
All they have to do when they want to tell us that there's a monkeypox outbreak or a Marburg outbreak is they take those old Colbert tests.
They go in the back room, they change the label and they bring them out and they're going to give you the same test.
And it's going to they can then cycle them however they will.
And they can do whatever they want to make it how many they want positive.
This is the this is the scam. And so I do think that they converted flu to Colbert.
You know, the death, you're right. The death numbers in 2020 were not out of normal.
OK, there was no pandemic death in 2020 that was more than normal yearly flu season, whatever.
But now, in 2021, the death rate went up considerably.
And that's post vaccine. You know, that's that's clearly what's going on.
But I do think that they put around some I personally think this started with something dramatic because there was some something weird happening in Wuhan.
And Larry Pilevsky, my friend, is a pediatrician from New York City.
He said, when I got sick about the time that that whole thing was going through New York, he said it felt to me like I got poisoned.
It said it just it wasn't like diseases.
And he treats all these sick kids. He says it wasn't like what I normally see.
It was something different. He couldn't put his finger on it.
But when I told him that story, I said, I really think that.
But the public thinks that there was a pandemic and that's why they were locked down.
So from our point of view, trying to get people out of this Stockholm syndrome or whatever it is they've got,
I found that when you tell them that there was no pandemic and you also said that actually I'm a medical doctor and I do understand what a pandemic should be.
And that all cause mortality and the way it spread around the world.
Well, it didn't spread, of course, the way it kind of was said to spread around the world didn't fit with a pandemic.
There were two ways that you could say, well, actually, this was not a pandemic.
But I think that they lied about most things and they lied about everything, actually.
And they lied even about their ability to create the diseases, which they said were the products of the gain of function research,
even though it was so illegal in the United States to perform that type of research or even to fund it.
They were doing it. And I think that was a limited hangout because I don't think they wanted to support the narrative
by saying that endless deadly viral pandemics could occur when I don't think they ever could, not just because there are no such thing as viruses.
Right. No, I agree with you. And I said, you know, Judy Mikevitz, you know, so I'm an orthopedic spine surgeon, just to be clear here.
But I, you know, and I said it's hard for me to go up to Judy Mikevitz, who's a, you know, a lab researcher in viruses and say,
Judy, you know, you got to change your language. There aren't viruses the way that we're talking about these airborne little molecules that go out and these little animal kills that make us sick.
And she's she agrees with that. She's because what she's talking about is I said, I've listened to you talk multiple times.
You're talking about she calls it infection by injection. I don't doubt that you can harvest genetic material or crap, whatever that Lansing poliomyelitis brain slurry of my stuff was.
You can take junk that is out of a sick animal, put it into a well animal and make them sick.
This shouldn't be a surprise to us, but it doesn't have. But that's a very far cry from airborne spread of these invisible, unprovable objects.
And that's the problem. That is where we get the fear of, oh, that we have to stay apart from each other. That's the problem.
And so I agree with you. The pandemic, there's I kept saying that I gave a talk in August of 2020 to doctors for disaster preparedness in August of in Las Vegas.
And it's still somewhere floating around the thing. And I said that I said, look at the death numbers. Here they are right here.
It's just not this is this is this is the last five years. This is this year. It's not different. This is not what's going on.
OK, and the maps don't work. And it's just this is a again, it's a takedown for other reasons.
And once we realize that we're in a war, not in a disease state, then people and it's a war against our children.
If we have to stand up because they're going to take out this this.
You frozen. Oh, you this deadly virus and this deadly vaccine.
Oh, the deadly vaccine is also looks like it's causing sterility.
It's we have a three percent in this country. We have Jim Thorpe just presented this paper.
Three percent increased infant mortality. That's huge.
I mean, you know, we heard about the 42 percent mortality in in in Indiana at this insurance company and working age people.
If you know, if you increase the 80 in nursing home mortality by 80 percent, that's not going to make a big demographic dip.
But if you take infants and now you're they're dying at a rate that and they're not being born, that's a huge demographic hit.
We're in a demographic nightmare right now because of that. That's our problem.
Yeah. Lee. So just get down to the basics that the public will understand.
In my opinion, as a medical doctor, there was no reliable diagnosis of covid-19.
Right. Both from the test, which should never have been used to diagnose viral illness.
We've never done that before. Right.
Well, it said and he was a chemist. He won the 1983 sorry, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for his discovery of the PCR technique, which was the basis of the so-called PCR test.
But he said himself before he was unfortunately killed, well, died in August 2019 that his test or the technique should never be used as a diagnostic test for a viral illness.
Right. Well, I don't know if you saw that part of my talk, but I showed you why that is.
You can't it just can't work the way they're saying. Yeah.
Not to mention the fact member they were putting they were doing these tests in your nose in the parking lot. Sure.
You know, I mean, what his one of his points is that even if that you have to be this is the skilled operator test has to be done in a very clean and sterile environment because a little bit of contamination makes the test meaningless, not just the over cycling, not just what you're putting on the basis on the on the test.
But we were waving. We were doing it in somebody's nose in a parking lot for the love of God.
I mean, that's just you can't make this up. It's just we don't train people in the United Kingdom.
So I wanted to ask you about the diagnosis because medical doctors should at least know about diagnosis because that's the whole basis of modern medicine or of the practice of medicine.
And if you haven't got a diagnosis, you can't treat. So there was no COVID-19 in my opinion for two reasons.
The test was completely unreliable. It was fraudulent.
And the other thing we shouldn't have been testing anyway for a so-called viral illness.
But the other thing was that there was no symptom, no symptom at all, in my opinion, which was a pathogenomic for COVID-19.
But they tried to obviously they might have realized that that was a problem because they tried to say loss of taste and loss of smell.
And then you had loads of people around me here who said, oh, I've had COVID-19 when I said, well, actually, there was no such thing as COVID-19.
They said, oh, I've had it. Oh, how do you know you had it? Oh, I lost my sense of taste, lost my sense of smell.
They heard it on the BBC. And look, they couldn't remember, Lee, that they lost their sense of taste, lost their sense of smell before COVID-19.
So one of my questions. So, well, what are your views on that?
Well, again, I agree with you. Medical doctors were all led all over the world into some ridiculous paradigm where suddenly the failure of diagnosis led to lockdowns because of the pandemic, allegedly, which was based on all these ridiculous diagnoses of COVID-19 when it wasn't COVID-19.
It's all in my opinion.
Well, that's right. I mean, and that's what I said about the pathologists were discouraged from doing autopsies.
If we really wanted to know what was killing people, that should have been the first thing.
I mean, joke about pathologists know everything but too late.
You know, so there were no autopsies. There was no reliable test. There was no pathognomonic symptoms. I'm with you on that.
Now, having said that, one of the things that's coming out, and I know he takes a lot of heat for this, but I think there's truth here, is Brian Artis's point that a lot of the symptoms here go with snake venom.
Now, if they did spread around a poisonous toxin that was just enough to start the whole ball rolling, that was not the point.
It was just enough to get this thing rolling so that people got scared of this disease and then they could get scared.
Then flu and everything got labeled in American motorcycle deaths were labeled as COVID deaths. I mean, it's insane.
So they incentivize the hospitals. They did everything to make it a big COVID nightmare that it wasn't.
But the point I'm going to say is, the people that still have loss of taste and smell, it turns out you unblock those nicotinic receptors by using a nicotine patch.
Long COVID is over. You know, your taste and smell come back. I know this. My husband had the loss of taste and smell.
Now, he didn't get all that sick because I treated him appropriately early on and he was fine.
But he did lose some taste and smell and that's what brought it back, was using those techniques.
So there is some possibility here that in this startup that they used something.
I'm not dismissing completely the idea of, see, I think in general, I think we're dealing with a horrible situation where we as human beings have been poisoned for millennia and told it's infectious disease.
That's the summary. And so I don't throw out the idea of poisons, but there was not a naturally occurring pandemic.
And we shouldn't be afraid of diseases like that. We should start taking action to detoxify ourselves from what really is out there.
Yes. And crucially, Lee, I think the point that we as doctors should spread around is that they do not have deadly viral pandemics cannot occur.
Even if you believe in viruses. So what we learned at medical school was that you had a kind of playoff between transmissibility and virulence.
But that was ignored by the Chief Medical Officer of England when he was trying to promote the Alpha variant as a reason why we should cancel the second Christmas running.
Right. And I noticed that he was talking about the transmissibility, the huge transmissibility of the Alpha variants.
Goodness knows how that was diagnosed. But he wasn't talking about the virulence.
And I thought that that even if you know, especially if you do believe in viruses, that was a lie.
And it was a very, very big lie from the Chief Medical Officer of England, no less.
Well, that's exactly right. We had the same thing. We had people being told by these medical officers and the CDC that there were these variants and they were.
And now we've got this variant coming out in this room. But I talked to people in labs and there was no way we were testing for those that was not being tested.
They didn't have a way to test for variants. And yet they're telling us all these variants are coming out until you talk to the people that were doing the tests.
And even that, you know, so even with the standard COVID test, there wasn't a separate test for variants, even in the state labs that they were claiming on the news.
They were lying about everything.
Stephen, that's 18 minutes already.
Well, hang me. I didn't. I've just looked at my ward.
So, Lee, so I was mystified as to why Peter McCullough was talking so glibly about the Alpha and the well, the Delta variant first and then the Alpha variant.
And goodness knows, you know, if you believed in viruses, then there should have been many, many different variants.
I would have thought. But they were only talking about Delta and Alpha, those two.
And I asked Peter, I was just mystified as to why someone like Peter McCullough should be talking about the Alpha variants and the Delta variants.
And so I asked him on one of these calls, but he was the guest, of course. So I was trying to be polite as well.
You know, I didn't want to kind of put him. I just said, how are you diagnosing the Alpha and the Delta variants?
And I think his answer was he looked a bit sheepish and I think he said sequencing.
And that's all I got. And I didn't push it because he was the guest and I wanted to be.
Well, you know, he also pushed monoclonal antibodies.
He also, you know, I don't want to say anything more, but I just I'm going to say there are people in this fight.
I'll just put it this way. There are people in this fight that always say good things, but too late.
Yeah. So I just want to make one last point.
So as far as I can see, they created all the conditions to create and maintain fear.
And in my opinion, people were psychologically tortured into a state of Stockholm syndrome in the United Kingdom, removing their doctors.
So you couldn't. So you went to a GP surgery in the United Kingdom and all of them looked like prisons.
They had loads of notices on and the doors were locked and the patients had to wait outside in the cold with their masks on to be let into the building.
And they were let in once a time.
And so the deal was they were psychologically tortured into a state of Stockholm syndrome.
And I think that huge numbers of people around the world is certainly in the United Kingdom are in a state of Stockholm syndrome as we speak.
And we need to rescue them. Okay. Excellent. Thank you, Stephen. All right.
Oh, my God. Got a lot of hands up. So John, look out first.
Yeah, thanks. So I'm going to since it's that intro was given graciously by Dr.
I'll forego telling you more about myself. One thing that she didn't mention that was one of the things we could talk about offline was, you know, I don't only aggregate and compare and evaluate info, but I also try to apply it.
And there was like starting in May of 2020, I began archiving events and blogging. I wrote a couple of books, one good one, not so good.
The first book gave me what I really needed. It was a 30 page medical thesis based on the work of Charles Roche that completely decimated the basis for this dangerous vaccine superstition.
And that book became a bestseller. But unsurprisingly, because it was such a punch in the face, it was immediately banned by Amazon who robbed me blind.
But it did get out there for a time. And I started getting calls from all over the world from some very smart people who had decades of experience in various fields.
They were anxious to tutor me. So I began a monumental crash force to acquire like some kind of working competency and all kinds of erudite fields.
And that kept me at my desk working about 18 hours a day almost this entire time. So I learned the more I learned, the more people I found like this.
So I got really good, really fast. I began to believe that I could reverse vaccine injury.
And my second book was a failed attempt to try to identify logical drugs that would counteract everything in the vaccines. And I knew what they were, even the undisclosed ones.
But based on this work, it was all based on the medical literature. And that taught me how unreliable that was. My second attempt was a spectacular success.
Few people know about involving a clinical trial. I conducted myself with full medical supervision. A lot of these people checking my work.
We had a terminal test subject and we fixed every condition we had, she had in about three months. So, you know, that's something maybe you can take a look at.
But, you know, there's so many things that you bring up here in this thing. I don't really know where to begin.
A lot of this, all these trails that I've been on, they finally led me to what I think is the core operation going on.
Everything else is noise to keep this out of focus. And that's where, you know, we get to James Teardown.
Okay, so, you know, I get that not everything this guy says can be trusted. I call him Slippin' Jimmy.
He appears to be the pitch man for the bio digital convergence and everything under that header.
But, you know, I would remind people that a PhD is an inch wide and a mile deep. You don't need to be one to understand this. In fact, it's better to be an inch deep and a mile wide.
But to explain this, you have to be 50 miles wide. And there's no way I can currently see that done this down for laypeople.
If you explain the nuts and bolts of this in ways that they can understand, it sounds like science fiction and you get dismissed as a loon pretty fast.
But this is a mature science that has created very real, very dangerous and very valuable products that use the human biofield in extraordinary ways.
And all of them are shockingly bad. So it explains the doping of everything.
Yeah, it explains the doping of everything with graphene and why it's such a big industry.
They're making the human body a reliable read write storage medium that can now replace the internet, almost replace the cellular infrastructure.
But that is still needed to bridge bio terahertz communications to micro megahertz communications and enable data transfer between actual people and biometric medical diagnostics gear, which they are just crazily developing in every kind of way.
Well, you're familiar with you're familiar with the chairman of chemistry and biochemistry at Harvard that got arrested on February 4th.
That was Charles Lieber. You know, that was his whole thing. You know, that's that's when I saw that happen.
This February 4th of 2020. And I don't think it's by accident that he got arrested that time.
He what was he doing? He was going over to the Wuhan Institute.
Well, the Wuhan Institute of Virology was next door to the Wuhan Institute of Nanotechnology, and he was a nanotechnologist.
And so he was going back and forth. And he got he got popped because they claim because he was taking money from the Chinese that DARPA didn't know about.
And they'd given him eleven million dollars in military funding.
Money spent here is crazy. Right. You don't give a chemist military funding because they're going to make coffee taste better.
He was working on the brain electronic interface.
And if you read the books by the book by Colonel Zhao and Wang on the what's called unrestricted warfare is what it is in English.
And there's a longer name that they translate. But anyway, the their number one, you know, this is 20 years ago after the Iraq War.
They they it was 1991. I think they published the book.
Their number one item that they wanted for the military, they were going to research and go after it was brain brain electronic interface.
So the Chinese and DARPA and nobody could do it until Charles Lieber.
And he came out and it was silver impregnated hydrogel.
I'm telling you, the hydrogel is going to turn out to be a part of this whole thing.
The toxin that started this thing, the you know, and what's possibly what's making people have these weird clots in these these shots.
We don't know. I mean, hydrogel is something to look at.
And, you know, the other point I'll make to your point is that when when you know when when you don't want a black pro, you don't want a program of basic research goes into the black world.
And that's when they stop publishing.
The Russians figured that out watching our bio weapons stuff is when you stop publishing things, that means we're using it for something.
When I was in medical, well, no, I was an orthopedic resident at the university.
No resident. I was a fellow in spine surgery at the University of Rochester, New York in 1989 to 90.
And they were looking at Hydra that, you know, the parasite that gets in or the little microorganism that can clog up aquariums.
They were looking at Hydra to span neurologic deficit in spinal cord trauma.
OK, and there was a lot of research going on about back then and you could find the whole thing.
Now that research is buried. You can't find that much.
So they're not talking about it. And it's interesting that they've changed the spelling of hydro gel, which I always thought it meant it's like your contact lenses, soft lenses or hydro gel, their water permeable gel to hydra gel.
And then you see it written both ways now. So there's something weird going on with that.
But I think you're right. This is an electronic that what the goal is, is the Borg.
Essentially, they want to hive mind of the Borg, I think.
All right, John, John, take it offline. We're going to keep moving.
Yeah. All right.
Albert. Hi, Dr. Merritt. Long time no see.
So the optogenetics, I love that part you did with Raynett Senam.
Raynett Senam. And you're but you thought we were talking about a Royal Reif in the microscope and he had he had created.
So what's the maximum microscope you could buy right now that with.
OK, well, that was thanks for that's kind of an interesting just sidelight for anybody that's seen this show is called The Silo, another another predictive programming movie.
And it's basically this huge silo buried underground and there are all these people living there and they don't know why they're there.
But there was some catastrophe in the world and they're there and they don't anyway.
But there are several rules of the silo. And one is you can only have a certain magnification.
And if you go over that, you get chucked out to die. Now, why would they care about magnification?
But here's the thing. Royal Reif in the 1920s in America made microscopes that were fifteen thousand five hundred magnification.
And he made four of them. He handmade them. He was a he was an engineering kind of guy and he was really looking for he's looking at parasites.
But in the process, then he could use these and he could then look at bacteria in their live moving forms.
He could watch them change forms. He could watch them go into these little tiny what he called viruses.
But we're not they were just they were just pleomorphic forms of the bacteria.
So he he watched all this happen in real time. Now, why could he do that?
And today we can get maybe twenty five hundred in a light microscope.
And the answer is because his whole thing was made with quartz.
Now, when I ran across Kazanacheff, I thought, wow, see, this is all about ultraviolet.
It's something to do with ultraviolet because you can see ultraviolet waves through quartz, but you can't see it through glass.
There's something they don't want us to see. You know, so that's that was the point.
So what's the magnification that you can buy now?
Like what's all you can get twenty five hundred twenty five.
But most of the practical purposes, most people look from you look from two hundred and forty to a thousand.
I was asking John Lucas about this very thing, and he was and he said, yeah, they don't know how today.
They don't know how he made these quartz lenses or something.
Is that hard to imagine that they can't retro engineer that they claim they can retro engineer all sorts of other stuff.
I think I think they could. They don't want us to see.
And I'm going to tell you, if we've been when I was in medical school, they told us every doctor, if you're going to be a good doctor, you have to you have to look at your own patients, your patients, blood yourself and as you're in yourself.
If you want. And I'm going to tell you, I made diagnoses when I was an intern that nobody else did because nobody else was doing that.
Well, now what are they told? Oh, no, just send it to the lab.
And the lab always processes it in such a way they're not going to see things like parasites and cancer cells.
See, this is where this is where this goes.
When I was in practice, I am this really kind of pisses me off.
I used to get called to biopsy spines for the oncologists all the time.
And I did not know that when you sent fresh specimens over to the pathology, they would see movement in cancer cells.
And they just said, well, it's idiopathic.
We don't know what causes it. Really?
You didn't think to look because I think it's going to turn out that it's because they don't want us to see if we'd had magnification to see this clearly, they would have seen it.
All cancers, those meds have parasites.
They're intracellular, tiny parasites in them, but we can't see them.
Well, God bless you, Dr. Merritt.
I said it a few days ago when you interviewed us, but I love you.
And you are truly one of my favorites.
You're like, thanks. Thanks, Albert.
Thank you.
Well, beautifully, beautifully said, Albert.
Thank you.
Julie from Chico in California.
I will add on to Albert's.
I'm fan girl.
I will add on to Albert's.
I'm fangirling over my ability to be on this call with you, Dr. Merritt.
I love your a lot of the things you said, especially the I-80 reference.
Right.
And I'm up I-5 in the middle of California.
And after that big plane landed from Wuhan in January of 2020, all of a sudden we had a bunch of people sick at the boat show, like all touching all the guy.
I'm like, what the hell?
What kind of toxin just landed from Wuhan?
But really quick and to your point on the whack-a-mole slide, you can probably add disease X.
Right.
I'm like, what is disease X?
Really?
We're not that stupid, Johns Hopkins.
Seriously, we're not idiots anymore.
And I'm going to go down after I leave this call to the downtown Chico where we have these water towers surrounded by transmitters.
So that'll be a slide I can bring to the next city council meeting.
Wow.
Really quick.
One of my favorite interviews you do is with Dr. Sam Sigaloff.
After hours, the military.
I love that man.
If there's anything about this that burns me and I vaccine injured, mom's vaccine murdered.
I worked at Enloe Hospital, got fired, the whole nightmare story.
And I'm pounding sand here in Butte County to get these taken down.
We're going to do a grand jury filing with Albert and Dr. Henry Ely soon.
So we're trying to get this thing stopped.
But you know, the you did one, it's called EMF and parasites.
And I put that into the chat for anybody who wants to see it.
That one was really eye opening for me.
And I send that one to a lot of people.
One of the injured people here in Chico, a Chico state professor after Pfizer,
she's got live blood and dried blood slides on a video that I put into the chat that show parasites.
And Dr. Robert Young named the parasite and her EMF damage.
It is unbelievable.
So everybody needs to grab that video link because you will actually see live blood,
dried blood, and she will walk you through the professor, but the impact of this EMF.
So that Chico state professor.
But really quick, my question is on Tom Renz recently at the MTG congressional hearing.
He made a claim about a vaccine injured person from Fort Riley, Kansas,
that apparently got a COVID-19 shot of Moderna in 2014.
Have you heard that?
No, I haven't heard that.
Yeah, OK.
I haven't heard that, but I don't know.
You know, in other words, it would have had to been labeled that they found a label.
I don't know.
Yeah, it was interesting.
So that's Tom Renz.
He threw that out there and he swears by them like Fort Riley, Kansas.
Maybe Dr. Lee Merritt would know about Fort Riley, Kansas.
Well, Fort Riley is big in this whole thing.
Yeah, I don't know about that.
But I will say that the issue with parasites, I think has there's lots of meaning.
And one is that I think the people we're dealing with practice this creepy religion where you don't want to take karmic debt.
If you kill somebody directly, you get karmic debt.
But if you let something else kill them.
So a great way to do it is to dumb down the immune system,
damage your immune system with injections and let your parasites kill you.
And I think that's what's happening in a lot of cases.
People get cancer. What's turbo cancer?
Why did cancer change in 2020?
Shouldn't have. Right.
We've had we've been around cancer.
It's never looked like this before.
But suddenly we've got a whole bunch of young military people that don't have their immune system anymore.
And they've been out snooping and pooping in the weeds and they've got all these parasites insisted in them.
But that was OK when their immune system was good, taking care of them.
Now we gave an injection.
The injection caused their immune system to dumb down.
They let the parasites out.
And now they they're growing these sacks and they call them Mets and they say go home to die because you got cancer.
I think first thing in the morning I try to wake people up with this.
Xi Jinping does not inject his military and his PLA with this garbage vaccine.
That's exactly right.
Either does Putin.
So Putin's army is out there getting stronger without any vaccine.
So anyway, thank you for your time.
Thank you.
Thank you. Good points.
Lee. Thank you, Julie.
Lee, one resource that you now have available to you is that Diana Henry on this call put a note in the chat that she has access to all pay walled academic papers.
So, oh, that is so nice.
And if you could just send a direct message to Lee or put you I'll see.
I'll see Diana's email address with you.
Well, if I can get a copy of the chat, because I also want to get that to you as well.
Other things.
I'll put a couple of papers in that chat to you can download that I wanted you to look at to one in particular was had 10 authors on it and it was on the, the effect of coronavirus worldwide through misusing wireless sensor networks.
This one right here is damning as hell. It costs a lot of money. I got a copy of it. I've been messing around trying to dissect it and other ones.
You know, I've got a really good handle on this nanotech now all the components.
Yeah, I'll look at.
But put your put your contact on you, John.
Yeah, well, I'll do it right now.
Excellent. All right. And so Diana, if you could put your email but we'll get that chat to you as well. Lee, no problems. Okay, Rose, our care warrior of renown.
Hi, Lee. First I gotta say you're a fabulous speaker and with a huge pun it really resonates with me.
Back in the 90s I was actually part of a neuropathic study where they were doing humming and chanting, because they found with the monks and the Native Americans when they took that away, their health actually diminished.
So my question for you is, is I'm I've been on the front lines now for probably about seven years and I'm working with a bunch of military right now.
So many of them are still being deployed have had the anthrax x, y and z. They know the 5G has been spread across the bases.
What is there that there can be some kind of protection for these guys because I'm now helping them because they're now starting to get oh I've got leukemia, yada yada yada.
And my contact who has a DARPA contact said there's nothing to protect from the 5G. So you talked about you know, I don't know that that's.
Yeah, we don't know. I mean we have EMF protection. So there's EMF protection and then there's 5G and unfortunately it's true.
If they, and that's why I heard a physicist say one time, and I thought she was a little crazy because she was in a Faraday cage when I first heard her.
And this is maybe a decade ago or five minutes, a long time ago before COVID. And she was saying if you allow this new 5G kind of stuff to come on, it's going to be like one day you're going to wake up and it's going to be an AK-47 on every single day.
And you're going to wake up and it's going to be an AK-47 on every street lamp post and every tree in the forest aimed at your family. At some point we won't be able to get ourselves out of this.
But now as there's a window of opportunity to stop this and to take these down. And I think there is a point there. I mean, you know, I got to say if they crank it up, I don't think you can protect yourself now at low level EMF.
For the everyday guy walking around, I believe in the EMF sol brand. I've got it on my website. And the reason is because they have bioassays that works.
They can show you that it doesn't open up that if you use their mitigation stuff near a router, the cells don't open up their voltage gated ion channels and they can show you the bread doesn't mold prematurely.
They've got bioassays that this stuff works and I don't just put a stone around my neck because somebody says it'll help me. I have to look at facts, but I think there's does.
But you're right. I think when the 5G is fully employed, if they want to zap us with it and that's, you know, I'm a laser operator. Let me tell you, that's what MAUI was a laser hit. I'm sorry.
Yes, it was. It was a 1064 laser hit. And why do I know that? Because 1064 doesn't hit red and blue very well. And it looks just like that's why it could melt the metal and not melt the plastic.
We're in an age when we've got people with weapons beyond our abilities to counter if they want to really do something. So we've got to, we've got to, everybody's got to start paying attention and being active.
You're right. I think, but I would have a look at EMF. So don't let anybody don't let these military guys die of cancer. Have them get on the parasite medicine. We've had people reverse leukemia.
We've had people treat their cancers. I mean, there's a lot of stuff you can do and I've got that what to do for vaccine.
Also on my website. Thanks for thanks for helping my guys. Yeah. Thank you, Rose. And as
And as Brunstad, you muted. Hello, can you hear me now? Yes. Yes.
I'm sorry, a little bit. I have a bit of a cold. It's very cold in Norway.
And so I just came back from India a week ago and it was much warmer, but I'm fine. I'm good.
And it was very nice to listen to you lead.
And I almost felt like I'm in heaven. Suddenly there is somebody who listened to what I believe in.
You referred to partly Robert Oldham Young and I believe you know him. I know him quite well.
Me and him will probably be on presentation tomorrow.
There's something going on in Germany with link to Holocaust survivors.
I'm not sure I should share this with you, but I will give a little bit of a detail.
There is a bit of a controversy now because Mike Eden was.
In a presentation to somebody in Berlin or Germany.
Maybe three weeks ago.
And. He was canceled.
And the cancellation was linked to what I know today because I talked to the people who canceled him today.
And. They wanted to try to explain why they canceled him because this.
I have the alternative is a Deutschland.
They they want to keep their party inside the possibility to publish on the YouTube.
Oh, yeah. And if he's on, they'll take it down.
And they were afraid it would be taken down and because of the risk, they canceled him.
Yeah, and they didn't tell it.
And they didn't tell him that before many days later.
And I know my quite well.
And he he was sharing that information quite early on.
And and I want to share this with you because I don't agree to that policy, which was coming out of Germany.
And I want to share with you the details why they want to cancel him.
Yeah, well, YouTube, YouTube does that.
I mean, I was on early on way back.
This is 2020 sometime.
I was on a show called Outside the Beltway.
It's the John Frederick's show, John Frederick's show.
And he had this radio show forever and he always put them up on YouTube.
And so this was just radio at first.
Wasn't I went on to his TV show when he got it.
But it was just radio the first time I was on it.
Just me. Where's my name being on that?
He got banned from YouTube for a lifetime one time.
So I don't even bother. I mean, in my opinion, YouTube, YouTube can go away.
I just think, you know, my to.
But now I want to go to the point. OK.
The main reason of that alternative is the Deutschland that they want to ban him is that
he disagreed in the policy of what you say, Lee, and you are a very smart person, I can say.
And the story is that Mr. Mike Yeaton, who is, I would say, one of the smartest guys I know.
And he's an humble guy who accept, let's say, past history.
But the story is that he on November 11th said that he.
Don't believe there was a virus. Yeah, that's a primary cause why they canceled him.
And the other guy, so what it back to, which I also respect very much.
He is a guy who still believe in a virus theory.
If we talk about these things, you know, we're not supposed to talk about that because.
We are supposed to believe in virus theory, but we are supposed to believe in all of that, you know,
and I can share with you that while I don't believe in it and I have studied it and I can tell you that.
Robert Malone, Robert, not Malone, but Robert Oldham Young and me, we know very well like you, Lee,
why this theory of virus is not correct, because if you believe in science,
you should be able to go back to Robert Koch and earlier days and you would find that you would need to.
Make a story of four or five or six steps where you would be.
Isolating and identifying of whatever you would be doing the.
Yeah, the Robert Koch post and as we're tied for tied for time, do you have a question?
Yes, so I would say that I am very much a fan of the.
To Lee and I think that this is a quite important story.
So, so is there any way that.
We can be wrongly that there is a virus.
OK, I say there might be a virus, but if there is a virus, has it been proven ever?
There is a virus. OK, I say there might be a virus, but if there is a virus, has it been proven ever?
And that's what you went to smallpox, etc.
It was DDT. So I turn the ball back to you.
Can you say that this is more or less the story that there is no virus, no proven virus?
If we've been misled to believe the virus is a prolongation of the stories and his question.
Come on. Yeah. Yeah. So so the answer is, yeah, I could say I, I do not believe the virus theory has been proven.
Now, what I cannot say is there's no virus, although I don't believe there is.
But it's not my job to prove a negative. They have to prove a positive.
In other words, the they have to show me in clear logical science with step by step and no hidden papers that there's a virus.
And that's and that's why Stefan Lanko ultimately won in appellate court about his case, because even the judge recognized that there was no proof on the papers given of a virus.
It was not logically consistent. And so I have to say, and I'm sure you're aware of his work.
I think that that they don't they have not there.
The onus is on them. And that's what Patrick King said in Alberta. Unless you can prove to me this thing exists.
How can you lock me down? You know, that's so obvious.
How can you do all these things to us unless you can prove it exists and they're going to do it again with this new one coming from China.
That's why this question is so important. But you're right.
I want to add that the China story. No, no time for stories. Thank you for your question.
Gary, we have a lot of questions. We've only got 20 minutes to go. Gary, the think.
Okay. Yeah, thank you. I'll be quick. I think on this issue of whether or not there's a virus, whether just virus theory generally.
Look, when I I go back to the 1980s when I started university and we were introduced to this concept of models in science and, for example, the model, the atom, do do do atoms even exist?
You know, Neil's the Neils Bohr model was a model that explained the observations that we see in natural phenomena.
It's not it was later proven to be not a perfect model and was superseded by other models who were then found to be flawed.
So I just see the concept of a virus as a model concept that explains natural phenomena that we see.
But it's probably not a perfect model. I'll let you comment on what your thoughts are about that.
But just about your true true true true Truman show, you sort of mentioned three fears that stop people from exiting the show.
I would suggest to you that there are a few others. There's the fear of there's the fear of being ostracized from society.
There's the fear and threat of job losses. We saw that actively employed during the pandemic.
Again, I'll let you know. I'll be key to know what your thoughts are on that.
On the information war, there's clearly an information war going on.
There's an information war relating to climate. And I worry what's the what's down the road in terms of digital currency.
One thing that you mentioned is about parasites and acne. That is new is new to me.
Do you have on your website sort of this anti parasitic sort and doses that can treat a young teenager with with acne?
I do. But it's not the only thing about acting now. Acne rosacea is not like cystic acne.
Please realize that this we're not talking about all acne here.
Acne rosacea is an inflammatory thing that is a predecessor of all. It's an autoimmune.
And it OK, fine. That goes into lupus and other things. If they keep giving it steroids, then the people develop lupus.
And so that's why. But but again, why is your immune system on auto burn on this high burn?
Because it's probably got parasites. And we can't prove that yet. But I'm just saying that's one of those diseases that we know.
That's why hydroxychloroquine was given for lupus and rheumatoid arthritis.
Yeah, so I wanted to ask you a final question.
So I first sort of encountered you on YouTube with your activity relating to the AAPS.
Are you still involved with them? And I recall there were court cases that we were all holding our breath with great hope.
But I never saw what the outcome of those cases were. Can you remind us and update us?
Well, well, the AAPS Association of American Physicians and Surgeons is the group of free market medical doctors that have advocated for ethical, patient centered cash pay medicine, basically non-government medicine.
And and so we have court cases going period. We don't we all we do briefs and things.
I don't know what the latest one is. You know, like one of the one of the things we did was we went to court at the Supreme Court level and and proved that you cannot force somebody to be drugged with an anti psychotic drug to then stand trial.
You know, that was one of the things. So that's the kind of thing we take on things that are ethical issues in medicine.
But had people you know, you can go back one of the talks that I gave there that I I haven't been able to go to meetings because I've been doing this.
I've been busy but recently, but I'm still a member. Yeah, I'm the past president, but I gave a talk on the lessons of Karl Brandt.
It's also written in their journal. And if you look that up, I ask at the end of that about the German doctors.
And I said, how you know, Karl Brandt, he wasn't a monster. It's really easy to demonize people. And then that explains their behavior. No, no, he was in an evil system.
And I said, the problem with Karl Brandt is he was a good surgeon. He was a good guy that saved a lot of lives, but he didn't get off the bus at the right time.
He he when he knew there was a problem, it was too late. And he just kept trying to save the country and did bad things.
And you can't do that. So will we know when it's time to get off the bus? And I think we've learned from covid. No, we won't know.
We didn't know. My medical profession rode the bus over the cliff. And it's really sad to see.
I think you had a court case relating to hydroxychloroquine or something. Was that correct? Did that go anywhere?
I don't know. I don't know if that's that's that. I don't know what the status of that. I apologize.
Yeah. All right. That's fine. What do you think about my concept of being a model for science?
I didn't get a chance to answer it. I'm sorry.
Come on. That's fine.
OK, I was just so my thought being that the virus is just a model that explains all the model.
OK, there's a model. It's a model that is so wrong that it makes people afraid of each other.
And that's why they're doing it. So I'm I'm not buying that it was just a random model.
See, I don't there are too many things wrong here for this to be random.
This is a this is in my opinion. Again, I'm a conspiracy theorist on record.
Now, I really do believe that this is a program thing against humanity.
So if you're going to have a model, it should fit the facts.
And they don't they just make they they kind of squeeze the facts into their model, not the other way around.
We should start with data and move that theory. That's fine. Go with theory.
Yeah. So thank you. Thank you. It's a great question.
Thank you. Thanks. Thanks, Josephine.
And Josephine, you seem to be on mute.
If you're not there.
Oh, hi. Can you hear me?
Yep. Yep. Hi. Thank you so much, Doc.
This is such an honor to be able to speak to you.
I'm a person that's walked around with a box of puzzle pieces.
And because of your explanation and your theft and, you know, of knowledge, you were able to give me a big picture of what's going on.
I totally am in agreement. I'm not a scientist.
I have worked in the medical field for 32 years and I totally agree of these crimes against humanity.
But I have a two part question. One is, can you elaborate more on these EMF products? Are there any good?
I mean, these groundings and stuff like that. I live in a city and there's not a lot of a lot of skyscrapers and there's not a lot of sun.
And my other question, too, is the protocols for HIV.
I know you've mentioned about lupus and stuff like that.
But in reference to HIV, is there a protocol? And thank you so much. I love you tons and God bless you.
I well, I'll start with the last one. I really don't know that much about what's the latest on HIV.
But ultimately, I mean, people with, for example, liver failure and all these different things that we thought were viruses and that were irreversible.
It turns out in a lot of cases when they're getting when they get off the meds, they were on and they get on.
They get on programs to detoxify, to clean out their liver and more natural solutions.
They can heal themselves. I know somebody that went from being on the liver transplant list to having totally normal liver enzymes because he did a beet juice based thing.
It sounds crazy, but actually, we just didn't look at those things because we were convinced about things like AZT.
And I can tell you that I know people that know people that know people like Magic Johnson that they may advertise some of these drugs, but they're not on them themselves.
You know, the whole thing about HIV, it appears now and I again, I haven't studied this enough to be an expert.
I'm not pretending to be an expert, but it looks like that HIV broke out after Fauci and those guys had had gone around to various six or seven cities in the U.S.
And convinced the gay community to get involved in a hepatitis B vaccine study.
And then we got then we got HIV and then we got AZT that kept that seems to have made people sicker because at the time that they were doing that, there was another group.
And I learned this from Rashid Butar. There's another group that was using selenium into these papers.
They were using selenium in these HIV cases, and they found that they were using selenium in these HIV cases.
And they found that by using selenium, they never progressed.
Yeah, they had this test again, the diagnosis, how's the diagnosis made by the same kind of fallacious testing theory that we're using on this.
So I would be very skeptical of everything.
And I would I would go back to what we actually know and what what, you know, the basics here.
So it's probably a combination of toxins and parasite release and a lot of other things.
I don't know, but I would not I would not go down the standard treatment for that hasn't been really great.
But that's not that's not official medical advice.
That's just what I would do if it were me. The other one about the EMF.
The only thing I can say, I'm sure there are lots of good products out there for grounding.
I think the best thing is to go hug a tree and go barefoot.
I don't use the grounding pads because I'm afraid they could be an antenna.
I just don't know. I don't know on that one.
But I do like like I say, if you go on my website, I've got some resources there and you'll see the one for EMF, Saul.
And they go through the science of why they believe that their product works.
And I got to say, we may not be able to save ourselves from the 5G direct energy type weapons.
But but the standard cloud, we may be able to mitigate that he thinks he can mitigate the towers.
The guy that owns his Corey Hills owns EMF.
So he had this discussion with him.
So, you know, that's a work in progress.
This is new territory.
But I think, you know, I mean, I I hardwired my house.
It's a it's a telling thing that the guys in Haifa and I think the tech is tech down in Haifa.
I think so. Anyway, these the smart guys over in Israel that create all these electronic stuff, they had their kids schools.
They got rid of the Wi-Fi and hardwired it.
I wonder why.
Right. I've heard that five can't have 5G in Brussels, home of the EU.
Absolutely. Thank you. Thank you so much.
I mean, I thought what it's worth of 20 years, I've been wearing my Q link to reduce my the impact on EMS.
Some people say it's bullshit. I go terrific. I don't care.
I'm in great shape. So do some keep doing some research and also look up Rob Verkerk.
Send me an email. I'll send you a wonderful two part analysis.
He did at the Alliance for Natural Health Global Rob Verkerk on vibrational healing modalities.
Everybody was in February of this year. Alliance for Natural Health dot org.
Wonderful resource. Lee, I'll send that to you as well. Josephine worth checking it out.
All right. We're tight for time. Jim, thank you so much. I appreciate it.
Thanks, Josephine.
Hey, Lee. Hey, thanks very much. Great talk.
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein versus the virus is in your paradigm.
Does it does it do allow for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as Jason McClellan says he designed to put in the vaccine?
Now, James is a ringer. OK.
Thank you. I know, James. You know, honestly, the problem is, again, can you make a genetically what's what's genetically engineered hydrogel?
Could I take genetic material and somehow program it into some hydrogel and make some kind of pathogen?
Absolutely. I can believe that can be done. Can I prove that's what it is?
No. And when I hear people say, oh, these people have spike protein coming out their hair follicles on autopsy and I say, where do you get the stains?
And they say, well, yeah, they get the stains from the same people that gave them the PCR test.
So it's a circular argument. And until somebody can independently prove to me that there's a genetic sequence that is coming out of some somebody's cells, there's doing this.
In other words, this stuff, I can't say that this isn't the nature of reality.
It's like the guy's point about the Niels Bohr's atom, you know, his his concept.
It might be real at some level, but but it hasn't been it's not something I can touch and taste and put on.
Now, at least the atom has some has some proof in how it works in the world.
I mean, we can make it work in theories.
This one, the spike protein, as far as I know, is just because they say it's there and they say they see it all over and they say it could see.
Here's the thing, James, you don't know. You know, you can't we can't know right now.
It's like the argument of exosomes and viruses.
Are we seeing these little globules at the EM because these are the these are the these are the cause of the disease or are they the result of the damage, the cytopathic effect and it's stuffed the cells spitting out?
How do we know that what we're seeing as, quote, spike protein, in fact, it'd be interesting if you know you could do this.
Here's your homework. Take the take the genetics of the spike protein.
Take this 1200 bases, take pieces of it, run it through the blast program and see and then hit human.
Don't run it through the general blast program because it's been algorithmically set to go all to SARS-CoV-2, but run it through the human and see how much of those sequences are in human beings.
Because if they the point is, they're not doing that.
They're not telling us how much. Remember when they told us in medical school that viruses were in our DNA?
Well, there you have it. I think we're spitting out stuff.
They're calling it viruses and they're using it against us.
But I can't prove that. I'm just saying it's not my job to prove that nothing exists.
The problem is they have not proven to me that this is pathogenic, that it's causative just because it even happens to be there.
Thanks. And do you want to talk about that type T?
No, we're tied for time. One question each. Simon.
We'll do that another time.
Thank you, Dr. Regan, for a great talk.
One point about the patent on COVID-19 there, it's actually been renamed.
So it's it's been filed as a different title and you can actually rename your patent into 2020.
So that's why it was called testing for COVID.
It's just a little detail.
Say that again.
If you want any patents.
So I can put you the the pattern that you said in the beginning that they knew the name because they had the testing for COVID from the guy from Rothschild family there.
They can go back and rename it.
Yeah, so they actually have the name.
They can go back and rename it.
Yeah, so they actually renamed it in 2020 as for COVID.
But before that, it was called system for biometric testing.
It has nothing in the title of the book.
So the pattern was applied for in 2015, but then with a different time it was published.
They have changed.
Okay, well, I'll have to go back and look at that.
I didn't realize that that could be done.
It's a bit the same.
Yeah, I can send that to you and it's a bit the same what they did with the so-called testing kits for COVID and people say look they've already put the name of COVID in 2017 on so many testing kits they ordered.
They were also actually testing kits for testing something in general and then they will be called COVID today.
But anyway, that's just a detail. I'll send you that by email if you want the actual patent.
The other thing I think I like really a lot just like other people said, yeah, the Truman Show comparison.
I wonder if we can use that somehow to pick some scenes out of it and change the audio and make it into today's scenery.
I think it would probably be funny.
But Fauci is Truman?
Yeah.
Just a little.
The other thing I was wondering is that saying as you say vitamin D and parasites, anti-parasites most important.
Why don't we have a monthly or six monthly anti-parasite treatment for everyone that is not comfortable with like what they do in Africa basically.
Right.
That could be done.
Right. We used to. And see this is my point is that we used to do things when I was a kid and when I was first in medical school what we did changed.
And it changed to make this possible. If we had had, you know, I grew up in farm country.
The kids got wormed when the animals got wormed. Okay.
And worms is a bad term because these are not all worms.
But the point is that we used to treat people routinely for parasites.
And if you look at the Rockefeller Institute that who always gets blamed for taking over medicine, his right hand man Frederick Gates pushed him to start the Rockefeller Institute to deal with parasites.
They knew that parasites was a big problem.
Hookworm was the disease of the day in 1920 that they wanted to eradicate.
So why suddenly did we decide that, oh, we're going to teach you about 1976.
We're going to teach you about parasites. But that's a third world disease.
You don't need to really know it.
But again, did we know little things that should have awakened us to it?
Of course, when I was a freshman medical student, they told us in medical school.
And I just remember it because I thought it was so weird.
Why would it be it increases your risk of multiple sclerosis if you have a lap dog before the age of five?
Now, why in the heck would that be? Okay.
Here's why. Because before the age of five, your blood brain barrier is not completely formed.
You've got and you've got little kids being licked on their face by their dogs.
And so when that happens and they're young, they're more likely to have this kind of the particular kind of parasite that apparently can then get into the neuro axis and cause this later in life.
So I think it makes a lot of sense.
In other words, when you start looking at the world correctly, all these little weird disparate facts start falling into the mesh.
And you say, aha, that's why it works that way.
That's why cancer is this way.
That's why rheumatoid arthritis is this way.
Well, if I think you know, your talk here is that if you look at the current events, which you probably know about the current event, which are the big solar flare who wiped out the telegram system in the early 1900s, I think it was 1912.
System.
The older telegram at the time, you know, yeah, yeah.
And then later on, I mean, I think there's there has been a very big solar flare also 2012 from the other side you can see Mr.
They could have wiped out basically all technology.
And then because of your talk, I looked up and I put it in the chat, a paper which shows all the diseases linked to all the solar spots.
Now they're looking at the polar.
Yeah, right.
It's not just this one. Yeah. And I'll tell you about four months ago, I had people calling me every day.
I had 10 people calling me probably because they started having a cough.
It is this electromagnetic thing always starts with lung irritation.
They start having a cough, and then they would get they'd get a slight fever, and they just wouldn't feel good.
And finally, after about four people called me, I happened to see on telegram, we had just experienced a big solar ejection thing that was hitting the earth.
And that and I said, I know what this is. Actually, I got a little of a cough too.
And I said, this is going to just settle down. It's literally sunspots. I mean, just let it go. And it did.
It went away. So we're it's true. We're seeing that. No, so I'm gonna go.
We're going to go. They recognized the.
And you can predict. I'll send it to you. Thank you. Yeah.
Yeah, so I'm the center of the chat. Okay.
And then Jill and Steve is the last couple of questions and then we're finishing.
And unmute yourself. Come on efficiency on and unmuting.
Oh, we'll go to Jill. Sorry. Sorry about that. Sorry. Sorry. Hi. Yeah. Sorry about that.
Firstly, Dr. Lee Merritt, thank you so much. That was a brilliant talk.
And you were one of the first that I heard back in 2020.
I don't know if you know anything about me. I'm briefly UK lawyer, but army officer as well.
And I totally also thought it was a bioweapon. So hearing you talk about that is very interesting.
So my first question is, are you willing to come on a podcast with me so that I can take you through your evidence in a more formal way?
Sure. Oh, that's pretty good. Give me a give me a thing there.
Okay, thank you. I'll email you. That would be brilliant.
And the second thing is, I've sadly got cancer and I'd heard you ages ago give a brilliant talk about treating parasites.
And I went on to your website and I couldn't actually find the talk and I can't find your protocol.
Oh, that's probably my fault. But I'm just being cheeky here.
I wondered if you could just let me know if you could send it to me or if you could let me know how to find it.
It's called the parasite paradigm. And I just sent a link to somebody just today.
But before we get off here, I will put the link on there on the chat. How's that?
Brilliant. Thank you so much.
Thanks, Anna. Wonderful. Thank you, Anna. And we're rooting for you, Anna.
Thank you. Get on to it and keep doing what you're doing.
All right, Jill, last question and then Stephen, and we're finishing.
Okay, last question.
I want to keep you very, very long.
Shocking.
Jill, shocking reception, unmute yourself and try again.
Otherwise, you'll have to log back in.
No, no, crap.
No, log.
Come back. Come back in.
Give me a second.
Or type the question into the chat, Jill.
All right.
This is.
Well, I should come. She'll come back in. Stephen, last couple of last couple of questions, if you have any.
And then we're we're going to finish. Where are you, Stephen?
There is. So, Lee, your journey has been has been wonderful.
You presented to us some two years ago.
That recording is available.
The work that you put into this overview, we've had a number of presenters.
In fact, there is a wonderful UK nurse, Kate Shemarani, who is absolutely on song.
And Kate's got a program on TNT radio.
I will get her onto here as well. We need more of those seven steps.
There are plenty of people on this call, including Julie, including Karen from Scotland, of understanding the functioning of the human body in this model.
As you say, seventy one thousand different codes. No, there's not that many diseases, but what a great moneymaker it is.
So it's a salutary reminder for. I'm back.
Charles, can you hear Charles? Yes, I can. Jill, yep.
Thank goodness for that. I won't take much time.
Lee, thank you for a very fantastic presentation. It really resonated a lot with me.
Can I just say a little bit? I'm a nurse, an advanced nurse practitioner, and I have lost my career through being awake.
But I work a lot with people about breathing and a lot of what we what we have missed out is that when the first thing we do when we're born is we breathe.
And the last thing we do before we pass this brief and the wonderful job that I have is making that a lot longer and more efficient for everybody.
And. People with covid, if it ever existed, people with respiratory conditions, we can help them improve people with cancer, we can help them improve.
And I've not got enough time to go into all that I could do. But Lee, thank you very, very much.
I would just love to contact make contact with you to explore with you what I do and all the stuff that you're doing, which is really amazing.
So, Charles, my husband and I, who's from Melbourne, we teach what's called butyco breathing.
And we'd love to come on board and explain a bit more about that. And I'm not going to take up any more time.
I know you run out of time and I kind of lost it when we dropped out. But thank you very much for letting me speak. Thank you.
Thanks. All right. That's interesting. Somebody said there's a alert on my website. I don't when I go to the website, it just opens up.
But are you overseas? Is this the Darius? Yeah, I'm in Scotland. Yeah, it's just popped up.
Oh, yeah, it's the same site. I don't know what they're saying. Yeah, that's just popping up through clicking through Zoom here.
So I don't know. But it opened right up. I just said go to Web page. I know that's kind of like roadblocks that get thrown up that are bogus.
Yeah, they just want to make me look suspicious. I am suspicious. I know they're suspicious. So I'm not your conspiracy theory. Yeah, they've got you know, I'm wearing it like a mat like a metal like this is Sam Sigaloff's
badge of plandemic reprimando and COVID-19 reprimanded ranks. You know, he got ripped out and one you know, another military officer.
He was 19 and a half years in the military and he was a West Point graduate, a colonel or lieutenant colonel, battalion commander, and they let him go because he would not take the shot and would not force his people to take the shot.
You know, that's I mean, he gave up his, his, his retirement and everything to do the moral thing. Really unbelievable what's going on.
Sam is a great man. All right. Thank you, Steve. Last couple of questions, then we're going to go. We're two and three over two and a half hours.
So Lee, thank you for presenting to us, but I wanted to ask you, so do you remember when we were, I don't know when you were at medical school, but when I was in medical school, the immunologists were kings of medicine, or at least they were in my medical school.
In the 80s in the UK, at least the immunologists, I was talking to Kevin Corbett, who's an expert on HIV. He was in London in the 80s dealing with HIV and he did a PhD and yeah, he so he knows Celia Farber who's on the call.
And, and he just happened to mention that in the 80s, the immunologists, their influence declined. But of course, the immunologists knew all about how brilliant the human immune system was and undoubtedly had great-
They would have blown the whistle in other words.
Sorry?
They would have blown the whistle in other words.
Correct.
Yeah, I believe it.
So I think that not only did virology come about for nefarious reasons, but also they had to get rid of immunology as a special, not rid of it, but to decrease its influence.
So they did, they killed immunology effectively, just like they killed Kerry Mullis in my opinion. What do you think?
That's an interesting point. I really hadn't looked into that. I don't remember. So now I was in medical school 1976 to 80. Is that about the time you're talking about?
Yeah, right.
And to be honest, I knew an MD, PhD. He was in my class, he was MD, PhD, and he was in immunology. But other than him, we had very little about immunology. You're right. That wasn't a big we know, you know, learned about antibodies and antigens and that, but it didn't have a lot of practical import in the practice of medicine.
Very interestingly, one of the people mentioned, one of the doctors mentioned today is Sukrit Bhakti, who is brilliant. I think he is an immunologist and a virologist.
Right.
Or Stefan Larkus, if I wasn't.
I'll send him the link to this video.
Okay.
Ask him what he thinks.
Yeah, no, he's awesome.
Yeah, he's awesome. Yeah. But obviously, it must be very, it's tough for us to watch the decline of medicine in the last four years.
But actually, it must be very tough for him because he's a medical doctor, but he's also a virologist, immunologist, and he's tying it all together. I think he's a toxicologist as well. I think he's got five different.
Oncologist.
Oncologist, wow.
Well, you know, it's like Stefan Larkus.
No, you're talking about the British guy.
Okay, right. Yes.
Yeah.
Do you know him by the way, Lee?
No, I don't.
He's probably the best qualified medical doctor in the United Kingdom.
At one time he was a professor of three different specialties.
Let's get this right. Oncology.
Charles, can you remember?
Epidemiology, I thought, and virology, something like that.
Or.
Yeah, something like that. Anyway, he was a professor of three different specialties in three different London medical schools.
Wow. So he fell in love with an Australian girl, you see. So there you are, while he was in.
Yeah. So, yeah, I've lost the point now.
So anyway, so yeah, he is the kind of medical student, I think, that professors wait around for 50 years.
Yeah.
But now we're discouraging them from doing anything except algorithmic program medicine.
We're not teaching them to really think and question. It's just, you know, you push this button on this computer and you do this.
And if this algorithm, you know, if the patient has this, then you go this list of things.
I mean, medicals, my son is a trauma surgeon and I it's sad to see what they.
He wouldn't have touched patients.
Guess what, Lee? They had to introduce that as well because they wanted to introduce evidence based medicine, which I always said.
I said 15 years ago that this is the road to tyranny.
Right.
Getting all the doctors to think alike on every issue that was prescribed by the computer is just ridiculous.
And there was no. So it undermined the whole practice of medicine because it took away the ethics.
Right.
I just say it took away the observation of individuals where we used to assess.
Absolutely.
Patients. You would see a patient walking up the ward.
You would look at them to see their skin target, their hair, their eyes, their gait, their demeanor, their weight, all of that stuff that we did as students has been taken away.
And now you just took a box.
And Lee, very crucially, we were taught at medical school.
I was taught at medical school that the history taking the history was the single most important thing.
You took the history. If you didn't know what the diagnosis was at the end of the history or have a differential diagnosis, some idea what the diagnosis was, then you had no basis for taking the ordering tests.
Of course, you had to do the examination as well, but the examination was highly unlikely to lead you anywhere.
That's what we were taught. And then you had to come up with some tests, maybe.
But you only did a test if they were absolutely necessary.
Whereas now the history is taken by the computer. The doctor doesn't think at all. He's not encouraged to think.
It's an absolute travesty what has happened to the practice of medicine.
It was done deliberately and it was done, in my opinion, to do exactly what they did in 2020, a global coup d'etat based on the improper use of medicine and science.
Got it. All right. You got it. That's exactly right.
Beautiful closing statement.
Yeah, we've got it.
Time, Lee, you've got to go. You've got time.
Stephen talking about history reminds me, Lee, of the bank robber who came into the bank and said, pointed the gun at the teller and said, hand over your money or you'll be geography.
And the teller laughs at him and says, don't you mean history? And the bank robber says, don't change the subject.
Thank you for the reminder, Stephen, of the joke. Lee, thank you so much.
Everybody go to the medicalrebel.com. Your Telegram channel again, Lee, is?
Freedom Doc One.
Freedom Doc One, everybody go to that Telegram channel to get the feed. Thank you, Stephen, for organizing. Daria, thank you for organizing. Lee, thank you. Big round of applause. We'll get the chat to you.
Thank you so much, guys.
Everybody, wonderful time. See you on Tuesday. Bye for now. Time is up.
Lee, if you're interested, please contact me. If you're interested.