All right, let's get this show on the road everybody.
But it's treason also, Pete, and Trump, you would think, would be very interested in that.
And I would like to know, for one, if he isn't interested in that, why is he not interested?
Because he's always saying how much he loves America and how much, you know.
So he's very important to Trump, one would think.
He should be interested. Nuremberg 2.0 is a thing.
Sure.
All right, let's go. Welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International.
This group was founded by Dr. Stephen Frost during the darkest days of the COVID scam responses with a desire to pursue truth, ethics, justice, freedom and health.
Stephen has stood up against government and power over the years and has been a whistleblower and activist.
His medical specialty is radiology.
I'm Charles Covess, the moderator of this group. I'm Australasia's passion provocateur.
My jacket is red because red is the color of passion.
I practiced law for 20 years before changing career 30 years ago.
And over the last 11 years, I've helped parents and lawyers to strategize remedies for vaccine damage and damage from bad medical advice.
I note that medical misadventure, bad medical advice is the third largest cause of death in America.
Look at the stats. I'm probably around the world, by the way, probably the same in Australia.
I'm also the CEO of an industrial hemp company.
We comprise lots of professions, including doctors, lawyers, homeopaths, journalists, scientists, filmmakers, professors, ex-military like our today's guest, Pete Chambers, peacemakers and troublemakers.
And we're from all around the world. Many of us thought that vaccines were OK.
Now, many of us proudly say, yes, we are passionate anti-vaxxers.
If this is your first time here, welcome and feel free to introduce yourself in the chat and where you're from.
If you publish a newsletter or a podcast or you have a radio or TV show or you have written a book, put the links into the chat so we can follow you, promote you and find you.
Some of you are just putting a link and not putting the name of your show.
So we don't know from the chat what link you've put in there.
So if you do want to promote something that's that you publish regularly, please say also what the show is.
Most of us understand we're in the middle of World War Three and there are various battle lines as part of this war.
Some of us believe we're in a continuation of World War Two.
Most of us understand the development of science and that the science is never settled.
This meeting runs for two and a half hours after which, for those with the time, Tom Rodman runs a video telegram meeting.
Tom puts the links into the chat if you are able to join.
We will listen to Pete Chambers, our guest presenter, for as long as he wishes to speak.
Then we have Q&A. Stephen Frost, by long established tradition, asks the first questions.
There is no censorship. It's a free speech environment with appropriate moderating.
Free speech is crucially important in our fight to preserve our human freedoms.
Some people think free speech means they can speak as long as they want and as many times as they want.
And that they would that that you know if if if the moderator me stops them, then that's not free speech.
Well, that's a bad understanding of free speech. If you're offended by anything, be offended.
We're genuinely not interested. We reject the offense industry that requires nobody to say anything that may offend another.
We come with an attitude and perspective of love, not fear.
Fear is the opposite of love. Fear squashes you. Love, on the other hand, expands you.
If you have a solution or product or links or resources that will help people, put the details into the chat.
The meeting is recorded and is uploaded onto the Rumble channel.
And now welcome to, I guess, present a former Lieutenant Colonel.
Maybe you're still a Lieutenant Colonel or Lieutenant.
I'm thinking Australia Lieutenant Colonel Pete Chambers, who has presented to us before.
We thank you again, Pete, for giving us your time, wisdom and insights.
And thank you, Stephen Frost, again, for creating this group and for organizing our presenter today.
Pete, over to you.
You muted Pete. Peter, you muted.
Matilda, can you mute?
Okay, there we go. We're rocking.
Wonderful. I love the set of rules there, Charles, that sets the standard and I'm a standards guy.
What I'm going to start out with, just to people that may or may not have been on when some of these calls when we've been together before, just a little background, just so you understand my life so you can have context as to where I'm speaking from.
I'm a soldier. That's all I've ever been as a soldier from 1983 until 2022. I hold the rank of retired Lieutenant Colonel.
And, and I'm proud of it. But I'm prouder of the fact that I started as a private with no rank, no, no nothing on my sleeve, because that's where I learned my leadership
tenants, I'm going to say tenants, and I'm going to, I'm going to share some personal stories along the way. I understand we got an hour to do this and I can do it.
The first role of leadership I had was at 18 years old when I showed up to basic training and they said, my sergeant who was a Vietnam veteran said, chambers, get out here and there was 500 of standing in this quad of potential infantry soldiers.
And to my best friend that lost his life in Vietnam, he is.
His name was chambers, you're in charge of this platoon so I got first platoon alpha company of echo nine to echo company, ninth infantry training brigade, second battalion second brigade.
That was my job. And I had that job all throughout basic training and that that taught me a lot of things so I had to quickly ascertain what was good and what was bad because you don't know when you're an 18 year old.
And I wrote this little book and I still have it somewhere.
The old military books with the binding that you know uses the heavy line filament.
And on left side was all the things not to do, and then the right side was all the things to do. Sergeant so and so did this look good to me. Sorry, Lieutenant so and so did this he ate after his troops.
I think that's really neat. So, so I developed this book and I carry it with me through my whole enlisted career and I added to it. And someday I'm going to print it up or, or have it published as a leadership manifesto, if you will, because the lessons
learned all into play when it comes to what's happening now with this attack.
We talked about the Breggins in their recent article that we are the prey.
We were just talking about that before the show. We are the prey we're always the prey. We've always been the prey. We've always been the prey of evil. We've always been a prey of those that want to seek to steal our joy.
Somebody asked me when I got out what of all the places you've been in the world from Australia to the Pacific Rim to North America training and then the Middle East, Afghanistan Syria Iraq, Africa, everything but Antarctica.
What have you learned about people. And I said,
They want to have love they want to exhibit love they want to feel love. They want to interact they want to see their children grow up they want to watch their children be married.
I lost paint momentarily. Stephen, are you still there? I lost me.
I don't know what happened then. Okay, well we'll just connect the two trials there are two bits of the recording now.
It's okay. It won't be a drama.
So we, we look at this. And as I'm learning these things as a young soldier and I'm sitting on the border of South Korea looking at North Korea, and for a year, and then I'm stationed in Hawaii enjoying some waves once in a while and as I'm, as I'm
putting on a different uniform that of an officer and now leading men, and then putting on a different uniform and becoming a physician and my specialty was emergency medicine. And so I was used as a resuscitative care guy on the battlefield, not in a hospital I never worked in
a hospital once in my military career.
I took people to hospitals, but I was the guy that that was there.
I was putting the first hand on a patient, so that we could.
And then my patients were all green brace special operations guys.
So we do it a little differently there we we also train to become green braids and that's our special forces, much like an SAS unit or a Ranger Battalion but we specialize in unconventional warfare, irregular warfare warfare between the seams.
And it opens your eyes up to the different things so it's like, I believe we speak a different language in that we, we are no better than any other soldiers just that we, I spent, you know, 20 something years in combat honing that skill.
And it's, it's allowed them when this thing came on and this thing is this this where we're the prey now.
Who is it that's doing it everybody asked who is it that's doing. And I'm going to tell you my opinion, and we could discuss it for hours and days on end. Who is it that's doing it.
This is a spiritually driven black ops operation by Satan himself and his minions. And this is my opinion, I'm a man of God, I left the army and of mankind and joined the army of God and fusion six, you know, putting all the full armor of God.
And I'm a broken man I'm not a.
I'm not a. I don't have a halo sitting on my head.
You know, but that was that all those things prepared me for this fight which is the biggest fight because this is humanity. This is not about red white blue America.
It is about the world, it is about humanity, and Todd calendars a good friend and he really opened my eyes up to the, the other side of this thing that I didn't have because when you look through a scope and all you see is battle, you know, physical kinetic battle.
And when you see that.
That's all you see for 20 years, you miss some of the other pictures now I, I grew to understand those things in briefings with congressman and, and the Speaker of the House, a few times in the United States and the king of Jordan was able to brief him as I was training
his troops down there with my team.
And you see their bodies and you see their, the way that they do things, and you see how they govern.
And we know that that that these governing bodies are are given that authority from above, and we render under Caesar what is Caesar's.
And sometimes under the doctrine of lesser magistrates which a Scotsman named Knox wrote up to the, to the nobility that you have to interpose for those people that you have to stand in the gap.
And this is what brought me to where I'm at now, which was understanding that premise, understanding my regulations, understanding the Hippocratic oath, understanding the initial information that was coming out about the shots the boxes, quote unquote.
When we were given the mandate on the last mission that I was ever on which was on the Texas Mexico border, guarding the southern United States, the most important mission to me in the kinetic realm.
In that mission. It was, it was my job to take care of up to about 3500 soldiers, give or take.
And my job was the ultimate end state as the task force surgeon to bless off on treatment plans modalities evacuation routes, preparing the battlefield it's not a battlefield but it's a different kind of battlefield down there.
It's preparing it for the command to be successful. That's my job primarily. But my job is also to be an advocate for each and every one of those soldiers from the lowest rank that I started that to the highest rank.
The general staff and the general really.
I advocate for them if they're that really nearly that they don't know what's going on and many of them don't.
When the two star general showed up at my location in McAllen Texas down on the Rio Grande River, and six soldiers at the time had taken the mRNA vaccine.
I'm always going to use quotes when I say vaccine, or that's what the box said.
When, when, when he came to me and said why is no one taking shots. Why is no one taking this doc, we need to increase the numbers we're not getting enough. He drove with the team.
I think he flew down actually from from Austin, five hour drive, hour and a half flight to the border to talk to me about this problem that he had because the numbers weren't high enough.
And he just looks at numbers.
And I said well, I gave informed consent sir, and I've told this on this show I believe but I want people to understand it.
That in this fight. There are moments of truth in this fight where we are the prey there are moments of truth when you're going to have to stand up and say, No, we're going to have to do like my one of my unit models was new stuffy on which is a French is we defy.
That was a special forces you have for brag.
And the other motto that we have is overall as special operators as they oppress only bear which is Latin is to free the oppressed. So these words have meanings.
Our oath of office has meaning the regulations have meaning. And when a general comes to me in that moment of truth, which we all will experience at some point you're going to have to tell a family member, a family member out of love.
And they're going to think that's wrong. And they're going to hate you, and they're going to, they're going to despise you, and people are going to think that you have a tin hat on your head or whatever.
If you're doing it out of love.
And, you know, I like what I like the rules that that Charles put out in the beginning.
If we live in a no offensive environment here.
I don't have feelings anymore. I wasn't issued those. So my job is to with straight face, and with straight fact, brief someone on the situation report, the sit rep.
That's the facts. If you don't like the facts. It's not my problem. My problem is to tell you the facts.
I've stayed in that legal moral ethical realm. First of all, do no harm.
Since I was a soldier, and then the Hippocratic came along as I became a doctor and went in to be a surgeon emergency guy.
Those words have meanings. And when that general said to me, Why is nobody taking the shot, you will quit doing informed consent, I had to say, sir, there's a regulation on that, if it's emergency use authorization by by doctrine by regulation, I have to do them.
He said, Well, I'm telling you now you're done doing informed consent.
And now, this is this is a moment of truth, sir, that is an unlawful order.
And there's a one star standing behind him and a colonel. And you can just see the ire you can see it build up. And, you know, of course he commented about my mustache at the time was out of regs. Okay, he got me there.
But, but the regs that I was that I was quoting in regulation 40 dash 562 chapter eight paragraph two through four were truths.
That's it people stay on your truth stay on those facts, but don't allow yourselves to get caught up in a Hegelian dialectic would create a synthesis, which leads to what initially they were calling cognitive dissonance, and there are some degree of that.
But now we're at now which is the Stockholm syndrome.
As a special operator, it's my job to to rescue people in bad situations. I've only been involved in one real world, hundreds of training operations.
But you go in and you rescue someone if they've been there for any period of time. They're captors, and let's just relate this to where we're at now save time by doing this.
And the governments have been doing to us collectively, especially the five by countries of Australia, New Zealand, Canada, United States.
And the five by countries.
We have allowed.
And the United Kingdom, we have allowed our governments to take away to give to take away to give. And we, and those that are cognitively dissonant who minimize the situation.
They want to believe that their government's here to help them. And that is the right methodology that the that's in the book in my field manual I call it the Bible.
That is why those people were ordained that, but it doesn't just say that render under seizure what it seizures, but it also says that if it's, if it's an unlawful and I'm paraphrasing here, there's not what the government, I mean what the Bible says, but if it's a if it's a, if it's a government
steeped in in in evil.
We have to stand up with there are moments of righteous saying there and truths, those things are done. Very measured, they're done very measured out of love. The greatest virtue of a warrior I say it all the time is love.
Steven Pressfield wrote a book, the gates of fire, and it talks about the battle thermopylae or the monopoly. And in that battle there are 300 Spartans that stand in the gap.
And then, and this fictional book talks about their, their dialogue and they, and they throughout the whole book they're trying to build what is the truth is virtue of us warriors in this quantum entangled fifth generation warfare we find us in ourselves in.
It's love. It's not accolades it's not how many people can you beat up it's how many pushups you can do it's not many medals you got it's not what your rank is, whether you're a civilian it's not how much money you have in the bank.
It's how do you operate daily, our love.
And when you don't, and you operate out of hate or despise or despair or fear.
Then the book talks about also the fear accumulators that the body is the body is a fear accumulator. It has these wonderful little systems called adrenal glands that helps us to fight or flight, mixed with the, the, the reactions the neurotransmitters in the brain.
And we see a pattern and we see that I put my hand on the stove it hurts. We don't do that. When I see somebody get hurt, it looks like it hurts, I'm not going to do that there's a sense of fear is a sense of fear where every time I jumped out of a plane,
because I knew what could happen. I broke my back on one job I broke my leg on one jump. Then I started to have more respect, but I didn't let the fear overtake me, because I was able to operate and control that adrenal cortical release of adrenaline nor
epinephrine nor nor those things take control of us. It makes us combat ineffective, or makes us unable to do our thinking processes in a logical planned out manner.
And so when you see all these things you're just you end end end to be so blessed to have been involved in so many things at the pointy end of the spear but also at the strategic level to meet with the thinkers and the, and the law givers and the, and to see their
minds and see how it works and to see our to ask the question, are these people really looking out for us.
I believe there's a faction that does, I believe that there's a huge faction that themselves and the leadership is cognitively dissonant or, or has Stockholm syndrome. I believe that there are nefarious actors that only think of themselves they put themselves
first in their pocketbook first that works at that level, but the bad guys as it comes down from the top, in my opinion, Pete chambers.
My God, Texas Pete chambers.
How it comes from me is, there's a dark spirit that that has overtaken the world that wants to see humanity squashed that wants to see that it to the next year down the transhumanist agenda take place, the eugenics take place to see people's joy taken away
to put people in 15 minutes cities or, or.
That was another term I heard but the 15 minute city model.
It's harder to see that in the United States and I was asked the question before. What does it look like there I'm gonna tell you what it looks like here in the blue cities and the democratic cities that are run by incompetent, in my opinion, legislators
and magistrates.
There is only one thing which is control. And if they don't have control, they get more vitriolic.
Now, we're seeing these, these once beautiful city San Francisco I would, I got out of the army the first time, as enlisted guy in San Francisco.
I'm in San Francisco, my out processing station, wonderful city.
It's a hellhole. Even Austin, Texas, this the capital of Texas downtown has become a very liberal bastion of wokeness.
And we hear grow woke, go broke. Well, go woke and experience misfortune, because that's the facts, there's no getting around it. There's no socialist country and all the places I've been that were socialist.
And that is doing very well right now. But those are man made control mechanisms upon mankind.
And then we add to it, the weakening and the watering down of the messages that are coming through the churches.
You see cowardice from the pulpit.
There are many that are holding out. And I'm going to tell you that it's my belief that until we give it back.
In the Chronicles 714 it says if my people will reach out will will paraphrase it will reach out to me and get on a knee and pray, I will heal their lands.
What says, we got to look at what 13 says because we never just take things out of context, especially when using the field manual the Bible.
It's a, it's a, it's a tool for me to look at it and go okay let's look at the bigger picture what's this chapter talking about.
So what we have to do is go back one, one verse in 13, where it says, if I take and this is a very logical sequence because you know the if then therefore, logics blocks building blocks.
If my people, if no, if I take away the reins drought.
If I allow the locusts to cover their lands or on food.
If I allow plague upon mankind.
If I allow them to talk about plague coven quote unquote viruses that are used in a pandemic, or a pH EIC pandemic health emergency of international concern.
If I do that.
And my people then do this, come back to me.
Then, therefore, I will heal their land. So we have the playbook.
So telling us what to do.
In my opinion, that's where we're at in this quantum spiritual warfare, because the, the fifth generation warfare stuff that's lower level stuff that is that is a war for your hearts and minds, you know, as we look at for first through fourth, being, you know,
Muskets going advancing to the rifle muskets and then to the repeaters and then to the machine guns and then to the indirect fire through artillery and mortars, then to the flamethrower and then to the tactical nuclear weapon and to the ICBMs which ultimately, if we ever got there, pray we don't destroy mankind.
So, those are first through third counter insurgency operations now we're starting to get into fourth.
In fifth generation. It's using data, it's using, you know, I don't even have my phone handy but it's using that phone to get things into my mind to sway my opinion.
So it's using a thesis and an anti thesis entities antithesis, which would be like a CNN and then Fox News, so that you think that you got a warm fuzzy with your crowd with your tribe, but your tribe is being fooled.
The same owners on both sides. And Todd counter uses that term with the owners, and I like that the owners have control over the large media. That's why these, these venues that we're on these these modalities are so so important, because we're getting the message out
And it's effective. Okay, because when we all started this.
When we started Stephen when you started this I mean it was.
It was, you were alone and not afraid.
I was alone and not afraid on that battlefield or on that border.
Telling truths to people that could squash my career.
I had 39 years overall between the active and the reserves and guard 39 years of wearing a uniform.
And I wasn't afraid of any man.
I respected rank. There was no man that that that that was afraid of, because I also had scriptures that I would go to on the battlefield that would keep me through that phase to control those fears, but in this world.
To the ability them to sucker punch us into believing into believing that coven was a thing. Let's, let's, if I don't want to get into the details of it but let's just use this as one example of this.
When every year we saw influenza A and B that were at certain levels and they would in the United States, you might have 30,000 deaths you might have 100,000 deaths some years when the coven came along the influenza deaths went to in the hundreds miraculously, all of a sudden.
If we look at and I saw the pre read on this, this talk, if we look at the PCR tests alone who were never supposed to be used in that way to do mass screenings on healthy populations.
When we cycle those up enough to where we can get a positive out the bottom of my shoe, that we know that we're probably going to get a lot of false positives.
I saw it happen.
Okay, but I'm gonna, I'm gonna get back to that because that's about the actual techniques.
When we saw that, and we're wondering why are there so many cases but we're not seeing them in the hospitals. We're not seeing them in these FEMA camps that we built.
And how do I know that.
I'm gonna tell you how I know that firsthand, I'm not getting the second hand. I'm not reading it off of a of a data sheet. I'm not reading it in somebody's sub stack.
I'm telling you firsthand, as the liaison from the, from the Texas military department to the governor of Texas governor Abbott, my job was liaison. My job was to make sure that all these places were tested around the state.
My job was to make sure that all the beds were available to take over convention centers and and hotels and build the bed capacity for this onslaught that the Imperial College of London told us that there will be 10 million people dead in the state of Texas, if we
didn't follow the rules, if we didn't do what they said. That's a fear tactic.
So, we go out to the first place to test Tyson's meatpacking plant, Amarillo, Texas, the largest meatpacking plant in the United States.
What do they do they test every single person that works there all three shifts, roughly about 10,000 people.
So, the threshold high enough to where the, the positives the false part of something I'm going to say, ended up shutting down the meatpacking plant.
Subsequently, the second and third meatpacking plants were shut as well.
And I used to tell them, like if you want if you want to stay open just tell your people not to call in sick. I didn't care about the repercussions, because that's truth.
That is the truth of what happened when we bought all of our PCR tests and they showed up in a warehouse in San Antonio, every one of them was marked with a Chinese word on the side.
Right.
So I quickly left that job because I kept telling them truths and they finally said you know what, we need to send you to the border you're better app for for combat operations or supporting that kind of an operation.
So I did. I went to the border for my last stint.
These fear tactics, using perceived science, using half truths. It's science yes, but the application of it was not true.
Those put fear into the minds of people that don't research their things because they only watching those two mediums of information.
And so did I watch Fox News religiously.
But because I saw what was happening it didn't marry up with the truth because I was at those places where they were setting the beds up, and nobody was showing up. So the Imperial College London had to be wrong in their model.
That's, that's the key.
The key is listening to places like and I see somebody but just put this up, oh a and end.
You pick it, if you believe that they're telling you the truth. That's where you go.
And I'll tell you my truth if I don't know when Alex Jones asked me one time on the Infowars show. What about, I'll do Alex Jones. What about January six, what do you think, Pete.
I'm not here to talk about January six.
Way bad think about Klaus Schwab, but not here to talk about Klaus Schwab, because I'm here to talk about the border, and what's happening to our soldiers, my soldiers at the time, they were like my kids.
And the sad story about that is I was relieved of my job that was sent away to pasture, and I retired because I had plenty of years and I retired.
But those moments of truth or are key critical to this whole thing for every one of us to do.
And the more and more of us that get together behind enemy lines, you know little paratroopers running around in the dark, and you're with the 82nd and I'm with the 101st and we say, hey are you with me.
Yeah, we figured out. We get together and when I meet all of you, and all kinds of other groups, and we all talk together. We all share the truth.
And when we share the truth, we become a force to contend with and that's my hope for humanity is that because I'm a glasses half full guy. I'm a truth guy, I don't have emotions, but I'm a glasses half full.
And I believe that we are at that stage, I believe it with with every ounce of me.
So we just came back from Virginia Beach, switch subjects here a little bit where it was attended by a guy named Glenn Beck. He's a more you would call him.
He is a man with a vision who was a heavy Fox News guy for a long time.
He'll tell you he started out very humble and he spoke truths, and he still does, but it wasn't about Glenn Beck at the same just saying that he showed up there.
This was called the first landing 1607 event in the United States. This is where the first landing took place from Great Britain.
John Smith, two other captains had three ships, they landed on this point right across the way from the Navy base there at Virginia Norfolk.
And they landed their ships and then they went to Jamestown after that but before they left to go to Jamestown to set up the colony. They to set up the township I don't know what account colony at that point but they, they dedicated this continent to Christ and they
took one of the masks off the ship and they made a cross and they put it in the ground and they did a covenant, a marriage, a contract with God and when you make a contract, like an oath of office you have to do your side in order to get that side.
And as we've fallen out of favor, and we've taken a knee at the, at the, at the altars of ball and moleck and ishtar and all these old gods that really kind of continue on in their in the minds of people and worshiping different things transhumanist
We will be gods we will all be gods we can do this we can put chips in your brain and make you, you know smarter than God through using artificial intelligence. When we start worshiping there, we lose favor.
The intent of this event last week was on the same date. Many years later, was to do the same dedication, and it was amazing and just just hearing the, the speakers but also the symbolism of that to dedicate this back gave me hope again in my Christian walk okay.
That's just me.
These attacks. Yeah, when, when somebody spoke a word of knowledge or and said that when this happened that legions of angels were released to help us in this fight.
Like I'll take one.
You know I mean, I'll take one angel, but a legions legions of angels are released in this tech because you've made this covenant with me and I'm gonna hold you to it.
I'm gonna hold you to this covenant, just like me, you go down range, you sign up on an oath of office that's notarized and kept in my records that says that I will defend the Constitution based on truth based on john Knox based based on the Bible, the Constitution
And that enemy is in our midst the enemy is in the wire. I've had enemies in the wire Afghanistan 2014 to gov valley, Afghan National Army guy picks up a squad automatic weapon felt fed fully automatic machine gun and shoots into a midst of us into our midst that's that's enemy in the wire, that's
that's called a green on blue that's a bad day.
And those can happen. And that's what's happened to us. So think about that guy like me sucker punched. It happened.
We ultimately, you know, ended up with a long day of fighting that day but and lots of casualties, but it's, it's the fight that's invisible to us right now that's happening.
How does that look. Okay, here's here's a prime example of how it looks.
A couple months ago, maybe two and a half months ago I was in Ohio, and a town called East Palestine.
When the train derailed, whether purposefully or not, we can, we can make a venture to guess.
There were certain chemicals aboard and out of 150 cars it just so happened that at the place where the train derailed was that those five cars that had these extremely toxic chemicals aboard.
And we were hearing a lot of things that the news was telling us but we weren't getting truths. One of my specialties as a, as a special operation surgeon is weapons of Max mass destruction and bio warfare now I'm not a, I'm not a theorist.
I'm not an analyst. I am a, how does it look like when my soldiers get hit by a bio warfare.
I take care of it. Okay, so I'm not a, I'm not the guy in the lab. So I'm not going to talk about that.
But what I'm going to talk about is, as I go up there to get soil samples, and then started talking to the local people about what really happened.
Then there were some truths that came out.
The truth is were this, and there were 12 of them, and I wrote them down I six, I can prove six going to require a deeper dive.
But through General Flynn was able to get those to President Trump.
45 former President Trump, maybe currently President Trump I don't know, believe the cute people.
Getting that information to him was key critical because he then got on the stage at East Palestine a week later I wasn't able to breathe from directly but to get it to him.
And he spoke a couple of my points and one of which was, this is a land grab the privateer corporations the corporate talker see is RFK who's running for president as well.
Robert Ken, Jr. is says the corporate talker see, because we are a republic constitutional republic some people call it democracy, there's our dialectic right now, where it creates an emotion and now we allow the synthesis take place.
There's, there's also a unit party across the world. And the unit party exists to
make us their prey.
We are their prey.
We create numbers.
We create the jobs we create the food we create the movement of things the logistics of things we create things we make things. Now, if I wasn't doing this fight right now.
I would be raising my cattle and selling beef, but I can't go do that because I'm stuck in this job, which is good. And I need to be in this fight, we need to be in this fight.
This is a noble fight, this is a warrior monk fight this is a well done good and faithful servant kind of fight.
And the way it looks on the ground, and at least in East Palestine in that particular case was chemicals released. They told us the worst case scenario, people start selling their land, people start leaving their farms, this is one of the breadbasket
baskets of the United States. The Ohio River Valley is very fruitful land. It also has the second highest oil reserve underneath it in the lower 48 Alaska has a huge one, Texas has a huge one.
But the Ohio River Valley and Pennsylvania down to West Virginia. Lots of coal, lots of oil.
One of the other points that I made was that the, there was a governor of one of the local states there and there's a senator that are invested in incident incinerator plants in the area to then take
local waste, pump them into the ground.
Okay, pump these ways into the ground to create a carbon credit, which is then traded on a bond market.
Okay, these are truths. This is where we're going with this this ESG stuff.
Where we're going with this is this fake world of green energy. You know it takes more energy to make a battery, a lithium battery than it does to fill up enough car, you know, I don't have the exact number but the lithium battery
thing requires a lot of energy to create the blades on the wind turbines takes more energy than the wind turbine will ever produce in its lifetime.
These things are facades they are what they have.
They have used to usurp our freedoms, our lands to then pump us into the 15 minute cities. So, those things all together now as we start looking back and standing back and looking at 40,000 foot view, and I keep giving you the tactical view on the
ground. You can see that these bits and pieces make sense. Now I'm going to talk about the border to give you another avenue of vector, because even I agreed in the beginning of this that COVID, in my estimate is only 10% the COVID thing
but it's 10% had a very large effect. As far as the attack vectors, it had a very large effect on our minds, on wearing masks, on creating cognitive dissonance. The only thing I can do to wake somebody up that's that's on the ground, it's got handcuffs on that's
stock home is grab them put them over my shoulder and carry them out of the room. I don't have time for discussion. I can say follow me if you want to live but if they don't they don't have time, because we are at that time sense of criticality.
We're at the point of no return if we don't go to the other side of the precipice, because we get pushed back.
We've got them on their heels they're scared the owners are scared. And Todd counter said this and he believes that the senior leadership of the, of the, of the owners is either gone, or is in such disarray in fighting and vying for the pole position of the
the first position they everybody's buying for that because they're all narcissists and they're all want to be the leader of of death.
These, these things that they're doing these.
They happen on massive scale and they were planned years ago and they're using the Chinese, and they're using the Russians and they're using all these other tools to play the world against itself, humanity.
So on the border, the border is an exact example of what's called mass human osmotic pressure is one thing, which my friend, a war correspondent Michael young uses that's his words I'm giving him credit human osmotic pressure.
So if I create a war in the Middle East.
There's a bunch of immigrants down to Jordan, let's say, south of Syria.
When I was there on the border there were two camps. I saw those two camps go from hundreds to 100,001 and 70,000 and the other, the camps of hot a lot and root bond on the border of Syria and Jordan, because Jordanian king wasn't going to allow them to come in.
They found another way out to the north went through Turkey and they ended up in Europe. Okay, so those people in that war, you human osmotic pressure.
But what does that do now the end state of that is transfer migration and transfer migration is a Marxist technique, which is used to take the people that live on these lands and replace them with more obedient people.
Americans trick traditionally Australians I know this about you I spent some time down in the Ross River training with your voice.
You're very hardy people who are willing to go and be those pioneers and willing to go and be self sufficient and live out in the, in the hinterlands and grow things and plow things and break ground and and and fish things and create things and be self sufficient.
So, the problem is the opposite of what they want they want to AI every computer and every factory so no human touches it so that we can decrease the population needs.
But what does that do when the population doesn't have an income.
Well they have to move, they go into a 15 minute city and they get a lesser job.
And what happens when you bring in on our border now 12,000 a week came across the Texas border alone when I was down there now it's three times as many matter of fact we're looking at 15,000 Haitians about to hit the city of Del Rio, Texas, in the next 24 to 48 hours, and the place where I'm
We still advise those people that are on that border from Texas, not the federal from Texas my former unit on how to create virtual fences and walls so we're fighting that fight in a very real sense.
But we're overwhelmed because the system is overwhelmed.
United States has 5 million new that we know about people since Biden took over.
Well, that overwhelms the system.
We can't feed every mouth.
And so in this chaos that's ensuing comes the those vectors once again, the covert kicked it off this particular fight in this particular battle.
And it only to me represents about 10% of their efforts, because they got a lot of bang for their buck on that one didn't they, because they got a lot of fear.
A lot of people jumping in line, a lot of people lemmings pushing their way to the edge of the cliff with the rest of the lemmings. They are trying to crowd their way onto there.
And I think now, I believe we're pulling more back with with talks like this because we're not doing this for our health.
We're not here to just talk to each other pat each other on back and say, Hey, good job there Pete, you're a smart guy. No, we're all busy. We're all in this fight.
The reason these things are effective is because we are doing this, you got to take a little time out of the day, I left the think tank came over here so I could do this because I want you to know that this is important I got the opportunity to do this.
So a spot day it was literally, you know, can you do this so they absolutely my chance to speak. We had a guy named Paul Revere. Sorry people from the UK we kind of won that first route salvo, but Paul Revere went out.
And he, he warned everybody along the way. Hey, the regulars are coming regulars he didn't say redcoats everybody says he said redcoats he said regulars, because they were all colonists they were all members of the United Kingdom.
That's what we're doing now we are all Paul Revere's in this fight we're all out there warning, telling truths. And that's why it's so good, your rules in the beginning once again, that you don't, you can debate it.
So, the debate is over in the end, I expect some debate. I want some debate but I'm just going to tell you the truth so I'm going to win the debate every time, but it ain't about winning that it's about sharing the truth.
If I don't know I'll tell you I don't know. And if your opinion teaches me something new I'll take it, because that's what that's how we advance this cause, because I find things out from soldiers on the battlefield or how do medicine sometimes when a soldier
when you run out of tourniquets, you can use this. Oh, that's a great idea soldier. Good job. And I started sharing that that quick creates combat effectiveness. So, we're getting close to the end of my hour but I'm going to finish out with this and then we'll go into the into the question
session.
When when we all collectively.
That's how we outnumber them and maybe 10 20,000 of these knuckleheads at the top. They got their lackeys underneath them that are yes men, but we can, and women, we can, we can work on them, we can work on them.
But we've got to start it with ourselves in that we've got to control our own fear. And the way to do that is control the chaos where you can't control chaos Pete. No, you can't, but you can control the controllables in the chaos, the control that you have action
on. You can control those things. So that's where you've got to ask yourself, what do I have dominion over what do I have control over, because really control is is overall control is impossible.
But as we all control our controllables, then we are seeing what I'm seeing now and I would, I would welcome any comments as to what people are seeing as well.
I don't know if you feel like it because I can't take the temperature of the world, but I can in little pieces like this understand those regions of the world so help me help me to help you help us.
And I've got another opportunity to advise RFK.
I met him a couple weeks ago in Boston when he announced, and I've spoken with him a few times and he knows me, you know my dog better. But he said where's your dog.
But when you have the ability to speak to people that make decisions. It's very important to understand.
Very important to understand that you've got to tell them the truth. Because when I tell somebody that's supposed to get to the top, the information, and it gets redacted at wrong number one.
Then at the top it's, it's a totally different story they can't make the decisions, but anybody that has the ability to speak to somebody like that.
And sometimes you're going to have to get your feelings off your sleeves and just take whatever they give you but just stay on the truth. And God bless every one of you.
I think we're close to that. And I'm welcoming my first question from Mr. Frost.
Dr. All right.
All right, Pete.
Thank you. That's scary isn't it. Telling the truth.
Thank you for sharing your truth.
Thank you for the courage that you have shown in sticking up principles I saw. And I'm wondering on the before Stephen asked the question on the Hippocratic oath I saw a note an email last week that that Hippocratic oath no longer is taken by medical school
graduates in the US. So maybe somebody can comment on that Stephen I wonder whether that Hippocratic oath is happening in, in the UK, but there was an interesting comment you know that first do no harm has been taken out of it.
Thank you very much, Pete for sharing your wisdom with us, Stephen Are you ready to go I've got a couple of questions but you go first.
Yeah, so, oh, I thought I was muted and not.
So thank you very much.
Pete, I think the, I think you're absolutely right, the, the greatest weapon we have is the truth and we can only know our truth but we need to be as truthful as possible.
Every last one of us because that way we get and sharing it with everybody around, obviously you know some people are going to get a distortion of the, whatever the truth is.
And I think that everyone knows the truth, but that all we can do is be honest about what we know.
And what we don't know.
And, and spread it around as much as possible. So, do you think that I am coming to the conclusion that the most important thing we need to do now is to educate our fellow human beings about all the issues which have had a light shine on them.
And I just wonder. So, one of the things that struck me I mean I knew it was bad before 2020 but since 2020.
I'm amazed how little people know.
There is a tendency for each one of us to think that everyone around us knows stuff for example I didn't realize that people have a very poor understanding of mathematics and arithmetic and, you know, numbers you quite often hear people saying I don't really understand a million
and certainly not a billion and I just couldn't understand that because I could always translate a million into 10 big football stadium, you know the number of people in.
And so I could quickly do that. And, but I just thought that, because I could do that, think in numbers and be interested, everyone else could. And then I realized that they didn't, they couldn't.
And they go through their whole lives.
innumerate and many illiterate, you know, and they don't care they don't ambitious they, they just don't care and.
And I just wonder how we're going to turn that around because caring about what we care about is very important because if we don't care about it then we're going to lose what we have.
Yeah, that.
My opinion, the.
This all starts in in kindergarten grade school obviously you know and then is it going to take us a generation to do that.
We've got to start though we've got to. So in the United States what I'm seeing in the rural areas is homeschooling and things like that.
Charter schools, PMA is private military private.
Clubs so they they join it but they're they're being taught by people that think that way to get that information out. I have a food forest abundance Academy down the road they're teaching kids how to grow things, and then teaching them history reading
writing arithmetic, so that they can then take some of the things they've grown, sell them at the farmers market, learn how to budget their money. Half the money goes to school half money goes to the kid.
And it's an amazing project, and it's being built just down the road from me, and it started in Florida with Jim Gale he'd be a good one to have on talk with you because that builds that sovereignty that you have.
The kid goes home teaches the mom, the parents that generation above them learns how to do it at their home and builds a victory garden, and then they go in and teach their own children when they become parents but to fix this problem I think the only way we can do it is to, to
We have to put people in that in that the things that we know and to be able to speak at their level to because I'm not talking down about anybody but because I have to speak to soldiers who I used to be at a very base level.
We have to, as people that do have some knowledge, be able to get down to that level to speak it straight playing and in and digestible pieces, if you will.
So, of the values which we hopefully know about.
Pete well what values do you think the most important, and if you can put them in an in order, but if you can't answer that question I understand it's a pretty wide question isn't it.
I'll go by just the principles that I use for me now, not me, as I learned but now.
And it's sometimes hard to do when you're driving in traffic, but you got to start with love I have to look at people, no matter how
misguided misguided perfect. No matter how misguided.
I have to literally step back and get over myself and say okay.
I got to love this person, I got to tell them truth, and that's hard that is the hardest part for me is that because I, my ego does step in a lot because of general see them general see spirit of spirit.
Perfect. Wonderful. Yes, that's my number one go to everything else trickles down from that but but then then comes the truth. So the next thing is for me is the truth and the truth to me is in this form.
It, it exhibits itself it where the rubber meets the road and truth is what I call personal courage, because you have physical courage to take a bayonet put it on a rifle and repellent an enemy requires physical courage, but personal courage is 10 times harder.
It is so hard. If it wasn't hard, then we wouldn't have only had three whistleblowers the United States Army amongst all the providers there were only three in the very beginning now they're more now.
And that's good because people follow, you know they follow leaders, but personal courage. That's a value that's a virtue, because that says, I'm sorry, that's an illegal order, that's an unlawful order.
You know the consequences of that that these things come with a price.
They come with a price there's nothing that's ever been told that was true that somebody didn't want to hear that didn't come with a price. But the price is not is not bigger than the price of not doing what you did.
Correct. Correct. And that's now.
Nice.
It's nice.
Even worse to say nothing.
It would be worse to say that's a that's called a sin of omission. It is worse to do nothing, because if you know bad things happen when good men do nothing. And it's so it's, it's so important.
But the price. Here's the price. When I was doing that and then they told me you're just going to go to the to the unit and just sit there and do paperwork, and we're going to give you busy work and then I started to retire at that point I put in my paperwork.
I'll be honest with you, I was depressed. I was used to being a person of stature in my, in my uniform and pride in my uniform and pride in my government and pride in my military.
And I was really, I felt betrayed.
And we trade by the thing that you own that you only know that I've only known since 18, when you're betrayed by that. It feels like a, an et tu Brute moment.
You just got betrayed by the thing you bled on foreign battlefields that you put bodies in a body bag that protected that Constitution, and you were betrayed by that that institution.
But Pete, don't you think it would be, you know, you're a human being I'm a human being. Do you think it'd be abnormal if we hadn't also felt a bit depressed about what was going on that all the terrible stuff that's been going on for three years, we
We all, we all are in that same everybody I talked to every person that I talked to in this fight every, every one of us has felt betrayed.
Sometimes, not embarrassed is the wrong word but alone, unafraid, sometimes afraid. Did I make the right choice. Am I going to lose my pension. I mean I was threatened with that it didn't happen but, you know, you're going to lose everything doc, you're going to lose it all,
I mean I lost pay and allowances and things during that time, but that was well worth the feeling that I have now of knowing that I did the right thing we all feel that now we do.
So having come through that, that difficulty that almost existential difficulty. You're in a better place to teach people in the future.
And well to speak about it because it's no use speaking about it if you can't do it yourself.
And then and how does that look, this is how that looks every day when I'm going through my phone or have it, my signal chats with my all my people that are still in the military that are coming out now and saying, and asking for advice and at least once or twice a day I speak to
somebody that's been backstamaged in the military, and I give them some hope and I sent them to a place where they can get help.
And those things right there. That's the, that's the equation that we don't see that the, the, that the output is emboldened meant the output is camaraderie, the output is, I have faith in humanity.
That's where those things happen. That's what it looks like, because I see these, these texts and I talked to him and I just got off the phone with one of them earlier with five or six people that we're going to meet, and we're going to go together and give advice to
I mean, there's, how did this even happen? I don't know, I don't know, but it's just people said, people have truth sense people of truth, they seek them.
And when they, when they find it doesn't take long with the sermon to figure it out, especially face to face. You go, I'm going to cling to this person, they're going to tell me what I need to know if that person is a man of a woman of substance, and they have some
experience behind them, and they have the ability to affect change.
So, Pete, I think I don't know what you think but I think that human beings are very good.
Very, very good at recognizing allies.
Yes.
Very good point very well said. Yeah.
I agree with the allies, because it doesn't have it in the ally thing doesn't come with a flag.
The ally thing comes with just.
And allies very important of course in, in the present circumstances.
But anyway, so I can come back and I so Charles, should we let people people ask questions and before we go to John, I'll go a question then john Bowdoin.
Have you looked at the legalities I'm, I'm trying to do this in Australia as well.
When, when a government official takes an oath when a soldier takes an oath.
And all of us, you know when you take an oath, who is that oath to in the UK and Australia ministers take oaths of office.
What I'm interested in is for all of us to think about who can enforce that house.
You know so in Australia and ministers as I will. I, I swear and maybe Anna can, from a UK perspective but no one has no one's really looked at this question but you mentioned the, you know, the, the oath that you took, and all soldiers take to uphold the Constitution.
What happens. And I don't expect an answer by really inviting us to think about it. Well hang on if a soldier if a, if a general does not uphold the Constitution, who has legal standing to then enforce that oath.
Correct. Very good point. So the Uniform Code of Military Justice dictates that for us in the military, that's a that's a separate from the bar law the common law or the statutory law that's different because that's on the civilian world and the military
So who has the authority is subordinates down to a private now who has the intestinal fortitude to do that is another story.
Because if he's doing something illegal immoral unethical, then it is my duty to tell him that's illegal that's immoral that's unethical. That's my duty.
If the if many people may not know this story but in Vietnam war there was a place called me lie, and there was a massacre that took place. And there was a lieutenant Cali, and he took some troops in there and said go in there and kill everybody in that village, and the
And they listened to him and did it. But there was one or two that stood up and they, they, they kept it quiet for months when they got back to the states.
But eventually it came out. And they were tried. And they were.
I don't know he was executed but life imprisonment. So, there, there is a.
And that's why I still hang on to the Nuremberg 2.0 thing, because these orders were given, but they were illegal orders, and they were based upon an emergency use and we can go into the details legally legal legalities of it but I don't think that we were going to go down that rabbit hole but but that we're at the start.
And then Todd calendar, he, through Lisa McGee foiled everything from the president down and that senior staff of the United States of America for their oaths of office, as for them.
They came back, not a one, not a one was complete and proper, not a one.
The only thing that was changed was it was it notarized was it signed by a witness, or the dates correct, some of them didn't have dates, some of them changed the wording, the oath of office for for for a member of magistrate in the United States is to the Constitution
to the United States not to a man not to the president not to a body, but to the Constitution to uphold the Constitution which means you uphold the laws, First Amendment, through the very last one is the Constitution.
And that is the key to how the United States on the outside works uniform colored military justice. There's a system, if a, if a, if a naval captain is got a destroyer and he's bombing a city haphazardly or starts a insurrection.
You don't just do a mutiny, there's a system for it and the executive officer must then go and say hey sir, we're going to relieve you of command there is a there is a thing that happens, and who, who enforces that military justice.
Very good so there's two, everyone to this two elements, well explained Pete on the military side, but also on the civilian side and I think john bode when we go to your question john and that's very relevant for all of us because we can then send letters
to the citizens, and so that to me would give each of us legal standing, and we put them on notice that we're going to hold them to their off to the oaths. So, the very few cases are run on it but I think it's going to be a very promising cause course.
So Charles I think the politicians in the UK and the you and Australia, for example, and New Zealand.
Their oath would be to the Queen, wouldn't it. Okay, it's an, it's an oath to the people you I swear, actually doesn't precisely say you know, there's an interesting question, Stephen, and the, and the wording of the O's also changes over time.
So, and that's what Todd calendar has been doing he has been investigating paid has any what precise, did these people take and Stephen there's no evidence that they did take the O's.
So, no, no, no doctor in the United Kingdom as far as I know, even see the Hippocratic oath, no mind.
Swear on it.
Interesting.
Can I interject here on that or not.
And it will get to you in a moment.
Okay, because I really I really need your input on this because I think it's, I really do think if we're going after these people personally Stephen and Anna and Pete, it's going to give us greater leverage all right john Boatman let's go to you so and then
Thank you. Nice to meet you, Pete.
I don't know if you know my name from dealing with Kersh and the rest of those guys.
So, a couple of questions first one when you were in Boston with the at the RFK thing. Are you the one that pulled the fire alarm.
I'm just kidding.
The other guys probably don't know.
In the middle of our FK Junior speech somebody pulled the fire alarm and we're all looking at each other like do we leave. And then the security came and said now you don't have to leave.
But, but to my real question.
You're in, you're in Texas right. Yes, sir. Okay.
I did talk offline sometime, I have a number of plans.
I've had about six people including Yaden and Kersh and Daniel Horowitz and stuff approach the Santas and Latipo.
I'd like to talk to you about Ken Paxton.
He just announced that he's going to do the grand jury thing. So I've been on the criminal track for quite a while now.
And it's since we're talking about the oaths, both they create legal duties to act specific to the oath taker that are beyond that of an average citizen.
And in creating those duties, they have a legal duty to protect the citizens because they're taking an oath, which is upholding the Constitution and so forth.
And in action, when knowing that something is in their purview is not being taken care of that puts them in a position of a criminal act or in it's called a negative act right there.
They're not acting when they should act.
So I guess it's not really a question but can we talk later. I don't want to talk in a big group here.
Absolutely. Yeah, because that falls along the lines of you know some of the things we deal with with after Uvalde dereliction of duty with certain peace officers and sheriff's officers.
Yeah, exactly. That's exactly what I read on to that. So I would love to be involved in that.
All right. How should I reach out to you?
The best way to do it is I'll send you a message on the side here.
And I'll find you and I'll send you one in the chat with my email and you can go direct.
Thank you very much. Yes, sir.
Thank you, john rose.
Hey, good evening sir. Hey, it's an honor to speak with you and know some LTC that you know, I'm a 40 year healthcare expert. And I'm in Florida working on the medical freedom, and also, I was in the Capitol on March 7 meeting with reps and senators there when they had
to do a trade show booth in the Capitol giving the shots in the Capitol.
One of the things that I found throughout the country is people don't know the basic laws, as in the 1974 National Research Act, which was signed by Nixon.
For this very reason, and nobody is aware of that law in the US.
The other thing I wanted to let you know is I speak to so many people in multiple states at the ground level and universally they feel I'm powerless there's nothing we can do anyways. So can you just speak to what was the best thing that you would say to them as far as fixing at the
at the ground level, at the city and county, local level. Yes. Oh, that's great question rose. Yeah, many people do that. So many people say that. What can I do ridiculous.
This is such a great question because this just falls on the heels of something that just happened in Collier County, Florida. If you're aware of it or not I'll share it.
There was a couple that approached me. The Kylie's this Scott and Jamie they approached me and said, Would you come down and speak. What is your speaking cost. Now I'm in Texas. And that's Florida that's a 22 Collier County 22 hour drive but I went down there.
And I didn't have a cost I just said well, you know, help me out with the gas I'll get there. This is important. And Karen Kingston was there, and myself and some local doctors and great Americans, and over a period of about two or three months of public debate
at the county commissioners level.
Now there were five county commissioners one of them. One of the county commissioners Mr Hall supported this to create legislation to create also a.
So, it was, I can't remember the verb is because it's very, very county level stuff but I'll remember here a second but they what they did was they created legislation to never take coven money again at the county level.
So, that's the city of Naples and San Marco Island.
And the ordinance as it went out as the legislation, the ordinance basically says we will not create this, we will not take this CDC money again that comes with strings which comes with with mandates and then the resolution that's it the word I was looking for the
And the resolution was eloquently written was we know the resolution is just who we are, the ordinances, where the rubber meets the road but I have contact with those folks because we did a debate, the open debate forum for two, two events to two events with them
And so, if you want to go through those pieces through. That's what people can do, but you have to identify which one of those county commissioners or city leaders, etc.
are going to be open to that. Now all five of them voted, and all five of them voted to take that off for that to turn around that was the first county that I know of in the state of Florida that did that.
And so, their intent is to take it across like wildfire across the whole state.
Now, there are a lot of people that really like the Santas and there are people that don't.
But understand that he, and it's neither here nor there to me but if he's potentially going to run for president.
Some of the things that he's done has not indicated that he's fully aware of the of not pulling some of the, the quarantine requirements should they should we get another ph eic.
And some of the bills that he's done has been very wishy washy as to how much it's really going to do between him and Latipa and I believe that opposed more on on fire about it than he is.
But he's considering running for office and I don't, I don't know what kind of other stressors that are involved with that and I don't want to get into a Santa's talk here but just know that at the ground level that's what I saw.
Same thing in Texas, we've been doing that here, creating citizens groups things like that neighborhood watch programs to be prepared for if we did have 24 hours 48 hours of no electricity or we did have two weeks of infrastructure breakdown to where we didn't have
logistics support with transportation bringing in food.
And so, while you're doing things legislative you can't forget that things happen in parallel.
And so, the controllable there is your development of your network of your of your support network, where you live, and being a part of it whether you could just knit, you know something or whether you can grow something, or whether you can provide medical care for that
because in Texas we do get hurricanes on the coast we do get tornadoes in the north. We are already set to do that in many places, but many places are not and I always tell people in my mindset, a warrior.
I look at the most dangerous course of action I know that if we can control all that below, then the most likely thing that's going to happen we've got it well under control.
But the most dangerous course of action is that we cannot beat ourselves for two weeks.
Should we have some sort of event.
If the most dangerous course of action is that another pH EIC is put into place in the WHO treaty which is more of an agreement it's not a treaty, but if this agreement takes place in our, in our government allows it to take it to the worst level.
And it creates some sort of a riot in a city and people can't get supplies can't get things.
I have to play those I work in those every day in this think tank, that's what I do. And we have to be prepared to handle that situation because typically that's done by the, you know, civil defense kind of people or emergency management kind of people.
When we saw when we see that system failing. We had to create it ourselves, and that's what we do, and we do it very legally, very much in line with the governor's office as a think tank where we're advising his staff on things on the border all the way up to responses
to the next pandemic.
But we have to be prepared so I think that group of people, you know, long winded way to answer is that grassroots is really where it's at, and we are.
We are the lesser magistrates but I think in really a greater sense where the greater magistrates because we're operating out of love because we know our neighbors.
Thanks doc hey by the way I sent you a private message because I have a resource for you. So thank you again. I will, I will pull it up here. Yes, thank you, Rose and Rose, can you just repeat the impact in your view of the 1974 legislation.
That's interesting.
Yeah, I haven't met a single person in the country that knows of it so there's a long lineage I always start with DDT.
There was radiation, should experiments, there was Dr. Southam in New York who was injecting people with government grants with live cancer cells and he became head of the Cancer Society.
And the Tuskegee was kind of the final one, and that's what the Belmont report was created off of to create the 1974 National Research Act which includes must have informed consent.
You must have an IMB safety board. You cannot do coercion and unduly influencing. That's where all of that stuff comes from and it's a combination of the Duremberg Code the Helsinki and a couple federal regulations, all put together.
Rose thank you for bringing it to our attention everybody please note, use, Pete, please, or you'll get the chat of course, and there's reference made to the Belmont anyone else who has links to the Belmont Act, and we'll share that with people share that with Todd calendar and
Warner Mendenhall, no one else has mentioned that Stephen as far as I'm aware of that 1974 Research Act.
I've heard it mentioned in these conversations.
So thank you, Rose.
Now before we go to Anna.
I just want to note in there we talked about the fact that Novak Djokovic and Stephen and I can now travel to the US Stephen because the man because of the VEX mandates have been dropped for visitors but they've also been dropped for all US federal workers federal
contractors and healthcare workers.
When did the VEX, when did that requirement in the last few days.
You don't know the dates.
You can now fly.
Hang on.
It's already haven't gone. Charles. So, Mark, it hasn't dropped stop yet.
No, it's the 11th of May. Good. Well, no, but I don't think it's.
They've just said loosely I think that the mandates are going to know the emergency is over on the 11th of May, but they haven't said anything about the, the people who want to get into the United States.
Yes, I just reported on that earlier that Novak Djokovic has been has now been announced that Novak can come because he can come and play his unjabbed and he can come to the States to play tennis now the precise date.
Right. No, no, Mark says it's the 11th of May, so I'm someone will know we'll find out. But anyway, but also 11th of May. Okay, just for you and me, Stephen.
But for federal healthcare workers and I presume Pete that means all military.
Right and the military's was pulled with last National Defense Authorization Act.
Yeah, so the military just went up there and lobbied directly with the legislators on that one. That was several months ago that we did that.
So the military one was pulled before the federal workers. Yes. Yep. Yep.
Thanks. Thank you. Sure. Also. All right, so everybody if you get if you've got the precise date terrific Anna over to you.
Hi, thanks so much, Peter that was such an incredibly inspiring and, you know, interesting talk to listen to you.
Everything you say resonates with me and as a fellow army officer more junior than you much less experienced than you. It fills me with hope that there are senior officers such as you who get what's going on and, you know, on it so thank you so much.
I just wanted to pick up on the US because obviously I can't explain what the US, how it works in the US but in in England, or in the UK at least, you know the, the monarch is the head of state.
And so the oath of allegiance is to the head of state, as the, you know, the monarch is head of state. And so you swear it specifically to, you know, whichever monarch it is.
And the wording is set out in various oaths acts, you know statutory acts of parliament, which nobody has the right to change.
And so you have the acts of parliament, and that includes the coronation oath act. And of course all eyes are on King Charles for Saturday.
Because there's all sorts of rumors that he's going to change the wording of the coronation oath and so lots of people have been talking about whether you can in fact change the wording of those.
And so the coronation oath, the coronation oath act of 1688 specifically sets out I think it's in section three, the form of the wording and says that that form must be used for all future kings and queens.
But what you'll find is that virtually every monarch who's taken that oath since 1688 has changed the wording.
And if you look at statutory interpretation the way that rules are, you know the way that statutes are interpreted there's a whole body of rules that you have to apply.
And there are two rules one is the golden rule, and one is the literal rule and the golden rule says that you, you know, you look at you have to interpret the statute in accordance with its intention.
So for example if the wording of the coronation oath at the beginning says you know that I will govern in accordance with the laws, you know all my territories which consist of blah blah blah.
You know those territories listed in 1688 are very very much smaller than the territories listed in the 1953 coronation oath given by Queen Elizabeth.
And you're allowed to amend the coronation oath to include all of the territories that she's governing for, you know, but then the second part of the oath has been changed at various times.
And there's been a lot of controversy about that. And the fact is that, you know, the only way that you can in fact change an oath is by changing the act of parliament wording.
So if you're going to be able to change it by precedent, you'd have to be able to prove that you have the right to do that because the original statute implied Lee allowed you to interpret it in such a way that you could amend it so sorry if that's very long winded and boring
But it is quite a technical point, and it's a very important point, because you know, not only as you say, are people not giving us, but they're not giving it in the correct form, they're not notarizing it properly it's not being witnessed properly.
And certainly in terms of people's understanding of the earth you know anyone who's sworn an oath to the to Queen Elizabeth, their oath automatically transfers to King Charles.
So the idea that you can suddenly say I choose not to uphold my oath because there's a mnemonic in this constitution doesn't work.
So that's an interesting point that people should be aware about as well including the.
And that can't be true because all MPs had to swear allegiance to King Charles, when he became.
Well that was nice. Yes, it is true because that's what the law says the law says it automatically transfers. And so I was also intrigued that they did that but I think that's more of a matter of formality that you know everyone knows that they have now sworn it to King Charles, but in
the absence of doing that, their oath would have automatically been transferred to Charles.
Right, because it said, and their heirs.
Because you know the act of settlement sets out the, you know, the, the heirs to the throne.
So it's assumed that for a period of time following the death of a monarch. You know there'll be a period where obviously everybody carries on as normal essentially, assuming that the new monarch is about to take the throne.
And so, everything stays in place, even though there's no one who's currently officially that office holder because they haven't officially swore the oath. If that makes sense.
I put the oath in the chat.
So the elite, the oaths just carry on to the new person and if you're then asked to swear it specifically, then sure, but you're not entitled to assume that your oath has fallen away.
And also was the oath that they made to the Queen, the same as the one that they made to Charles.
Or the other way.
I would say the actual wording is set out in the Act I think 1872.
And Mark and Mark put that in as I'm just reading it now, and it says I swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and paid I'm interested in the in not so much the military oath but in the US but that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to his Majesty King Charles his
and successors, according to law so help me God that's it.
And so it's interesting. I bear allegiance to the king, according to law, and so it's not. That's where the question of the enforceability with us, whether you and Stephen can say hey you aren't acting according to law.
That's the question of legal standing and I think Pete's point is that in Australia.
The minister swear allegiance to the Queen but anyway that's that's the it's a precise wording and my question there and is if I swear an oath I'll be true allegiance, according to law what's your view about who can enforce that.
Oh, only the king or us.
Both in this, in this Constitution we have the right to put in the monarch to uphold the coronation oath, which all office holders should be upholding.
And it's a person who should then be you know, enforcing the office holders to uphold their oaths, but we can also petition the office holders to uphold their oaths. And can I just say, make a quick point here.
The original oath of allegiance 1688 specifically sets out the oath of allegiance that the, that office holders should take, and it was a huge oath of allegiance.
And it's been gradually watered down over the years, and the original oath of allegiance made sure for example, that no papists could take office.
And that there was a big section pretty much setting out the treason laws.
So, you know, that would be enshrined implied Lee in an oath of allegiance, even though it's a much shorter version because it's still part of the Bill of Rights and that hasn't been repealed.
Nice. So, whose responsibility is it to ensure that oaths are not changed, because if they can be changed at any time according to whim or whatever, then you might as well not bother with those, because that's the whole point.
I think a question, Stephen, and I'll tell you what I found out on that I contacted, I phoned up the Archbishop of Canterbury to challenge him on why the Archbishop of Canterbury 1953 accepted the oath of the monarch, as amended.
I spoke to his secretary Dominic Cummings, and he said, It was nothing to do with the Archbishop of Canterbury, and that I should contact the ecclesiastical Law Society turns out they're a charity they're not part of the Law Society of England and Wales at all.
And it turns out that was a misdirection because of my research shows that it was actually a privy council decision, led by Lord Chamberlain, who said, Yeah, well when you look at the legal position, whilst the act says that you cannot change it, because I think it was seven monarchs had in fact changed it under our law that creates the law of precedent.
And so it's been allowed.
Yes, but it shouldn't have been.
I think that's a nonsense and, but the practical reality is, if you're the head of state, you must be a, you must be entitled surely under common law and under ethics and morals to have the wording of the oath that you would want to have, because you're the one who has to uphold it.
And, you know, whilst it has to be in accordance with the law, etc. You know you can't uphold an oath that you can't.
So Anna in the context of Charles and his interest in the green nonsense.
That's not me, that's, that's some other like King Charles you're talking about Stephen isn't it.
Correct.
So, it's very important that we look at what is said by Charles on the day, and that we go through the fine tooth come identifying any changes in the wording and drawing attention of everybody in the United Kingdom, that the wording has been changed, if it is changed.
Exactly.
So the whole point of an oath.
The whole point of an oath that it seems to me is that it's immovable it can't be changed. So if people are changing it when they want to change it, that's nonsense and if people who should be responsible for policing this business.
Don't do anything, then that's also important.
Yeah, well as I say the first part of the earth is bound to be changed because it sets out the territories over which the is, and those territories have changed.
So that will necessarily be changed but it's whether or not any of the other part of the wording is changed.
I can't see the legit, you know, the legitimate reasons to change any of the rest of it. So we need to get a transcript on it, and of what is said on Saturday by King Charles III, if it is the third is it.
Yeah, well, yes, I think it is.
So the exact wording of what is said, complete transcript, and then compare it with what the what he should have said, and then point to any differences and say, find out who's responsible.
It sounds like the, the people who seem to be responsible, like the artificial cancer, it sounds like, you know, somebody like him should be in charge of something like that but actually it's a little bit like the law of exhuming people who've been buried.
That actually is not, not the people you think it's other people who are not accountable.
David Kelly his body was exhumed.
Yeah, it was responsible for authorizing it apparently amazing.
To be fair, they're thinking about it further it's not really the Archbishop of Canterbury to say whether or not the wording can be changed. That would have to be no but yes, but someone of his standing, you'd expect when you, if they're going to be serious about it.
Yeah.
Oh, yes, similar standing.
All right, so it's it's well worthy everyone thinking about this because it's not black and white answers now Pete, putting on your military hats.
John Baldwin, and, you know, this the there are lots of people involved in groups on this call now and people who are watching this recording subsequently in groups.
So as a military man we've got where we've got a spiritual war on our hands strategically strategically with there are people taking action there are citizens groups taking action there are, as I said, Mark, before you came on the call, you're out there
against the 15 minute ghettos.
Pete is the word you're looking for that Christine Anderson was using all 15 minute concentration camps. So Mark has been taking action. My question to you as a military man with the fight that we've got you think about this all the time.
You know what strategically is your recommendation for people involved in groups and there are many groups represented here.
Number one, above all, number one, you have to network the other groups, because that is where the lifeblood of this thing takes takes form.
If, if we're not when we started this thing in Texas when I got kicked off the border as a as a truth teller.
I immediately went to my local community and said you'll have a neighborhood watch yeah I said let me let me talk to him next week, because now I was getting out of uniform and soon as I got out of uniform I could do that because we have to be careful we
don't create a new militia we can't use that word. That's a scary thing, even though it's in our constitution, a well formed militia.
But, you know, so I created a neighborhood watch program which, you know, there's little old ladies in it and there's, there's young guys and of course the young guys are ready to, you know, charge up to out the battlefield and was like, they say
about that voice. This is about being networked for that in that thing that could come down the road. We pray it doesn't happen I've seen ugliness of war we don't want that.
But we know that there will be other things that will be useful for literally several months later we had a winter storm and ice storm shut everything down and we went went to work.
But then I drove several hours because in Texas you can drive a lot of hours and still be in the same state. And I ended up in Stephenville and they had a group already started there and I network with them network of these.
And so, five groups in Texas now.
Six one coming online, our network. And that becomes thousands of people thousands and thousands, and all concerned citizens who are doing something, and they're all doing something that's the key is so look for work network.
And then let's look at what I did for a living as a green beret my job was to go into foreign countries.
And to do one of two things, if it was a legitimate government and they were friends of our country we did what's called foreign internal defense.
In the opposite, if it was an illegitimate government or it was a bad actor state, or it was an organization that was a foreign terrorist organization that we call an FTO, then our job was to do unconventional warfare.
They're both the same thing, it just depends on who the customer is.
Well there's certain lines of effort that have to take place for all that stuff to happen. And strategically, the first thing you do is you develop rapport with, we call them the G's or the gorillas if we're talking about World War Two and Office of Strategic Services, etc.
So, I have to develop rapport. Hey you this is me, you know I think like you, I want to defend. Well I go to this other group let's say out in the mountains of, you know, someplace that I want to dime anybody out, and then you find out there are a bunch of nut jobs
that are carrying rifles that are trying to figure out how to attack some thing in America. Well we're not going to network with them but you got to develop rapport rapport goes both ways.
And this is the kind of person that I want to be aligned with, because alliances are very important.
And they're important at the micro and at the macro level.
So this develops. And in this unconventional warfare or this foreign internal defense line of strategic lines of effort.
And I think that multiple take place throughout the whole planning process because we have to understand. Currently, there are many places.
When I'm thinking about the atmospherics of this what atmosphere we in, are we operating in a permissive environment. I would venture to argue that we are not, we are in a semi permissive environment.
I would just go and exercise all the freedoms that are given to me in my constitution, because if I'm in California, and I'm a doctor, and I say something against what public health is saying, I lose my license, that's a semi permissive environment.
I am controlled by something that is above me, even though the Constitution of the United States allows me under First Amendment rights the ability to say those things.
I'm not there. Therefore I'm semi permissive that changes my planning for my strategy. If I'm in a non permissive environment, that would be Baghdad in 2004. When I was there. Bad place to be very non permissive.
You can't walk outside the gate with a US uniform on without getting shot. So you don't do that. That's not permissive we are not there.
Yet.
Now, the yet.
We've got to get to those dots so it just doesn't happen because that's that's by doing these things. We will avoid that, because that's ultimately.
We got a saying in Texas if you poke Bubba in the eye enough times, Bubba is going to fight back. Now Bubba may go to church every Sunday, and he may pray for your soul, but eventually you keep poking him and that's the intent of the, of the bad actor states is to poke
to a certain element of the population who are.
Now, they are the doers, but sometimes they do things out of passion and they might jump a little bit before they make a good decision.
They will prey on that, because we are the prey, they will prey on those people. So for that position.
What is it that separates us from the other five countries that keeps a little bit of fear in their hearts. The Second Amendment. And in the Second Amendment. You have the right to have to protect yourself and that's a that's a common law thing that's a biblical thing you
have a right to protect yourself. A man goes in someone's house, you do. So that's, that's the environments are so important how you plan these strategies but first of all it's got to be the network.
And then from there those those specialty people who want to talk to legislators, talk to county commissioners, etc.
On the issue of arms because the US system is so different to the UK and Australia. I'm not sure about Canada have elected sheriffs.
So this, so this issue in Texas because that's where you are at. Ham. Number one, how many county sheriffs are there in Texas and number two, you're suggesting that the report be built with those sheriffs because their mothers and fathers as well, aren't they.
That's what I work on heavily that is one of the main things I do here is that because I did carry a commission as a peace officer in the state of Texas for a long time as a reserve. I understand their, their lingo and they know me is kind of like Doc holiday.
I'm just throwing it out there.
I, we have a rapport with the sheriff's in my contiguous area. There are hundreds of sheriffs in the state of Texas however many counties I can't remember the number of counties but hundreds.
It's a large state, and every sheriff based upon where they're at I could say the difference between Travis County, which is Austin, that sheriff is going to be very liberal.
He's probably not going to be a constitutional sheriff so don't waste my time there because I don't have a lot of time so I don't go talk to him. But in Comal County, just south of me, or Hayes County where I'm at now.
We have report.
We have a system where people have a formed neighborhood watch program, which is sanctioned by the sheriff's office to give tips, if you will, but not on tips on who's not taking the shots that stuff is crazy stuff.
We're talking about tips on hey there's a crazy guy driving on the road down here we want to let you know, or during a time of duress snowstorm winter storm or hurricane.
This group gets together and helps people.
I don't know if it's a loss of power that any of that important, but the sheriff's constitutionally in the state of Texas especially what which is backed up by the Constitution of Texas.
All right, they have more authority.
And I would say, under the doctrine of lesson magistrates but also more authority legally by those two pieces of paper, then does the President of the United States in that county.
They have the authority to arrest, they have the authority to detain a federal agent that comes in their county that's doing something that he perceives as illegal immoral unethical, or let's say he has a search warrant, and he goes to execute a no knock warrant just kick
the door down. But the piece of paper says it's a knock warrant. He can arrest that federal officer, does it happen, not very often. Do they leverage them sometimes and lean on them a little bit.
Absolutely. And John, John Bowman asked the question, can the sheriff impanel a county grand jury.
Absolutely.
That is something that has to be done we've talked about that from, not just in Texas but in many states.
I think I think what you're talking about ties into what Anna was saying that the military don't understand military law, and the sheriff's many times don't understand their powers.
I think you've just raised something, you know that perhaps john point out there's 254 county sheriff's in Texas. Perhaps one of the things that we should all be doing is educating in, you know, educating our local enforcers, the way we've got some rapport about what
rights they have and what their obligations are.
This is, this is something that when we do meet face to face we, we say because here's the old sheriff is appointed position, he may not have came come up in the ranks as an officer or a peace officer as a sheriff deputy, he may not have.
He may have been appointed or not appointed but run for that office. And then he goes and gets a kind of a fork and knife school on how to understand the law and he gets a legal block and he gets these, but they're not necessarily going to be from the ranks that
they're going to be from the law, and even peace officers when I went through as a reserve deputy. We got a one day event several hours to understand all of, you know, criminal law, it's impossible. So you understand the things that have that affect you in your job and you
way. But yeah, that they have to, they have to be involved.
Okay, that's, that's an interesting so educating the law officers, same in Australia, it's a different process but we building that rapport with the local police and telling them what their rights are and their duties very good.
Okay, that's, that's, that's most helpful that everybody I really, you know, these groups that building of rapport, because the sheriff's often don't know what they can do and certainly in Australia, many politicians don't understand the, the operation of our own constitution,
they are ignorant about the law as it applies to their role as politicians.
Right, john.
I just wanted to comment on the grand jury thing it's going to be different in every state and even counties within states and like Texas being so big. That's awesome that you have kind of grand juries, we're the last, we're not the last I can't say that there's some little
country I can never remember that still has grand jury system but as far as the bigger countries and the five eyes. Everybody got rid of them but the US now we have federal we have state we have counties I believe New York City has a city grand jury, which is kind of weird but
they for people listening, it's not innocence or guilt, the output of a grand jury is probable cause, it's whether or not to indict, but you don't have to have a true bill or no bill whether you're indicting or not you can have a, a presentment.
A present and can sit on the shelf forever. Now, if you're, say, looking at murder, there's no statute of limitations. So you can wait till the next administration comes along and that present and still sitting there from a grand jury 10 years earlier, they can pull it off
the shelf and and indict and prosecute.
The other thing is in the grand jury investigation they can haul anybody's ass from anybody in the US anywhere in the US into their into their grand jury to testify you can you can reach out and grab power chief from Texas pull him pull his ass down there.
You know, put it put his put his feet to the fire with questions from the grand jury you can subpoena evidence that they have to bring.
It's extremely powerful US people citizens don't know how to do it.
The problem is that all of the executive branch departments of justice the State Department of Justice they all believe they control the grand jury's, well they effectively do pragmatically, but grand juries can on their own.
Tell the legal advisor, and there's a legal advisor appointed to work with the grand jury because they're just citizens they don't know the law it's like you said, you know, who's who's who's bringing the knowledge of the law.
It's the legal advisor in the federal, it's the US Attorney that's appointed.
And then you people have heard about a special prosecutor there's a special rule called the special prosecutor or independent, independent counsel sorry same thing.
But on the civil side they both have to agree on it. So, anyway, long story short, the third paragraph in my opposition memorandum that I filed a few weeks ago that still hasn't been ruled on, I'm sure I'll be dismissed.
I think they're waiting for it to be moot. So when vaccine mandates go where they're just going to say oh it's moot now you're dismissed on mootness, because I think I made a good argument for standing.
But anyway, my third argument there is a legal pathway for the grand jury for the judge to impale the grand jury without a legal counsel from the government but one that the grand jury can then pick on their own, who's a retired prosecutor who has some honor from
an older generation.
And then lastly, to provide a report a public report to the people.
The people just want to know what happened if the government's going to be corrupt the grand jury can come out and say hey, they broke all these laws, this is your government it's all corrupt they should be indicted but they're not going to indict, because they're not going
to indict themselves. But here's the public report unsealed. That's what I'm asking for. Anyway, just wanted to go on that rant.
Everybody so John is a resource for all of you if you want to get into grand juries in your state in the US. So thank you john for that reminder Pete on the question of the military to groups of people.
The injured from the jabs.
And then those who like you lost their commissions, or were discharged, like my commission but my job. Yes, lose. So he's losing. Thank you.
So we've got two groups. So the injured and those who refuse to jab and therefore lost their jobs.
What's happening with using them as a resource for the war that we're in.
Absolutely. So I always tell people remember that, you know, when you, you say I didn't take the shots, you know I was smarter than you or I came into it, I figured it out before.
That's good. I mean it's awesome. But remember that these people we still have to love them, they made a mistake. Yeah, I was told you got to take this thing if you're going to go be the provider on the border you're the only guy and this
was before January, going down to the border, and all providers had to take it. There was a mandate for us way before.
And it, you know, hindsight 2020 would I do it again, heck yeah I would because I got to take care of people and keep them from taking it. But we have to understand that when we, when we polarize those people because they took it.
And the ones that are damaged, or the ones who had orders we call it orders being flagged, they couldn't get promoted, or they lost pay, or they got discharged out of the military, those things.
If we want to reinstate those things. We want to bring them back into the fold.
It won't happen with the current command structure the way it's at now, because they will not pivot off of their, their wrongs, their either ego, or there's something involved there's somebody higher up telling them that you're not going to pivot off of this.
That's, that's going to be a hard place to be. But we're working on that because that's what I was up here lobbying at the NBA because I had to go through the house, and then the Senate, and the house said well, we could consider some of those reinstatements, we can consider
some of those things. The Senate just said no, we're just going to pull the mandates we're not going to even look at that.
But there are still legislators up there fighting for us the very few who are saying okay we need to look at reinstating because if the war that we're in.
If we are weak militarily, we're talking about the ability to fight on a war on two fronts in the United States, two fronts, you have to.
Recruiting is down 25% for just the United States Army alone.
If the pilots that have been backstabbed 35,000 in the inventory pilots, not not numbered backs damage but we have 35,000 pilots, roughly, in the all of the military.
If roughly about 4000 of them have had an event post jab.
That's a significant reduction in capability, whether they admit it or not.
That's a reduction in capability.
I've had some sort of an event.
That's called readiness. And when I argued readiness at seals versus Lloyd Austin, the Tampa court case a federal court case, and said, my, my.
What I came up with they're not safe they're not effective we can do it by lesser intrusive means.
What does that mean. That means that I don't have to give somebody a jab in order to keep them well well how do you know that doctor, because I had 3000 soldiers on the border, and nobody was sick when 12,000 people walked across a week, which, who knows what
their back status was, I was more worried about tuberculosis. Okay, with that many people from around 130 countries around the world coming across.
So, if I could, if I could articulate that in a court case and say that, and, and, and they, they accepted the admission of that information.
But the point of this is is that if, if, when we're especially when we're in court, and it.
That's where those things happen with guys like me. Okay, people that have information, but not everybody can do that not everybody can get to that court case, but we can and a little, and that's that's the important things to keep these truths coming out, because
in the military.
We were not going to get the generals to decide all of a sudden, you know what I was wrong. I think I'm just going to change my mind. I've only had one Colonel that called me after he retired and said you know what Pete.
I was involved in that decision making process, and we did you wrong after I got out I started looking at things differently. And I'm sorry. And I said I accept your apology. We're not going to go have coffee now.
Well, the question the reason why I asked this question the number that are injured.
And also the number that lost their jobs because they refuse to be Chad, they are resource for the people on this call paid in America, and Australia, where we got to love them and I got off my original point of the answer was, we've got to bring those people back in
we can't say hey I'm a pure blood, and you're not. We got to get off of that thing. You need to say, look, we're all in this together. And how can we help you because think about all those coming out now, or whether they're instilled, that is it that's in this fight with us,
absolutely huge number. And, and as Warner Mendenhall told us when he had three weeks ago, the legal group of 250 who came together many attorneys were not aware of how many attorneys were thinking the same way and I'm sure there are a lot of military who are not aware.
Yeah. Right.
So, I would urge all of us to somehow reach out and somehow we need to use this resource about people who are clearly going to be on our side I'm certainly not in favor of discriminating against those who took the jab and being injured I wouldn't do that.
It's a resource for all of us in this war.
And they will fight with us. Based on that relationship.
Warner said, Charles, he specifically said this, he got the impression but I don't think he fully understood the significance of what he was saying he got the impression that many of the lawyers were alone and isolated.
That's right. Yes, those were the words, weren't they? Alone and isolated.
And that was, that was the aim to break social bonds to isolate people.
And any torture. Well, yes, any torture that was taking place would make them feel 10 times worse if they had no social contact.
So I wanted to ask you,
you in the military. There've been a lot of vaccine injuries, you say, Pete, you know that for a fact here.
In the US military. Yeah, well, I mean, can I can I prove it with a diagnostically.
I can just say that I haven't anecdotally.
So you're a doctor, and you can rely on anecdotes to reach a medical opinion so I'm just. Yes, so your medical opinion as a doctor was that there were a lot of vaccine deaths so what I wanted to ask you was, if that, let's just say that that is the case that a
loss of vaccine deaths, sorry, injuries in the military, and maybe deaths, I don't know.
So it would stand to reason that some of those people who've been injured would be military pilots.
And as you know, you're a flight surgeon, aren't you? So, as you know, the margins are very tight.
For some of these planes, especially when they start doing things that are right on the edge of the capabilities of the plane.
And very often the pilots. So I just wondered, have you heard. Well, maybe you don't want to say but if that's the case, just say, have you heard of any.
Have you heard of any, how shall I say, instructions or recommendations that pilots were not to push the plane to the limits and not to push themselves to the limits that you know whether any kind of recommendations like that.
I was kind of winding up to the question.
And then of course the next question is, if you so there's a lot of vaccine injuries in the military you'd expect some pilots military pilots to be affected.
And I think that the boundaries are used the right at the edge of the capabilities of the plane and the pilot, but a lot of the time.
How there must be, there must be crashes. So, if there are crashes are they being reported. Yes, or are there suspicions that the dammed crashes aren't being reported is all being covered up.
Perfect. So, as I said, out of the 35 to 40,000 pilots that are in our inventory right now in the military. That's the number roughly in the United States military of those reported this last year reported were just over 4000.
And I'm going to give you the exact verbiage, it was a reportable event. Right, so this is a reportable event the definition of a reportable event is either a death.
Okay, not not specifically, we're not talking about attributing it to a vaccine we're just saying out of 35,000 pilots. We had 4000 reportable events in this last year 2022 in 2019 prior to 2019 reportable events definition, death or hospitalization
of something that was significant. Okay, that's the definition. So, we go back and we look before 2019. Now we're looking in the numbers that range anywhere from 26 to 50.
To 51 year 100 150 averaging roughly I would say somewhere around 100 reportable events out of roughly 35,000 aviators.
So it's almost 40 times.
It's 40 times more than previously, and that was 2022 in 2023. It was 3000.
Give or take, I don't have the exact number reported to me from Dr long as information that was in the current system, as they're reporting it reportable events, not talking about covert related in 2023 that this show me, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, backwards.
2021. And then prior to that, in 2020 2000 some odd reports can see an increase. Right. But here's the concern. We can see a decrease in hospitalizations on that same demographic.
So if we had a decrease in hospitalizations the definition is death or that we can only assume that those would be deaths, but we cannot get death information because it was, it's been kept close hold for some time now over the last two years.
Numbers that are attributed to any diagnosis, other than it was the crash that did it. We can't look at them and say what was their back status. Now, we've had a safety stand down in the last 48 hours in the United States over all rotary wing assets, that's helicopters.
In the last, believe 48 to 72 hours, a safety stand down. We've had so many collisions we've had so many crashes over the last few months that it got to the point where Fort Rucker, the head of Army Aviation which is rotary wing mostly has done a safety stand down to investigate the cause.
I wonder what that might be. Bingo.
Okay, but that's a good thing. Now I asked Dr. Long I said have they asked you, and she is an investigator, she is a senior investigator. She's an aerospace trained, not only aerospace.
She's one step below an astronaut in her training level. I am just a plane flight surgeon, that's my job, because I had to know high hypo beric medicine to take care of special operators jumping out of planes.
She does it for a living.
Never once did they ask her, where you investigate one of these, because they know that she's a truth teller.
And she has not been asked and she's a senior person in that job.
So, I don't understand how the figure can be going down for hospitalizations. If the figure for both hospitalizations and deaths is 40, at least 40 times higher from what it would take out if the hospitalizations went down you have more deaths and that's the point,
but I don't have, I can't know.
But what I'm trying to say Pete, it would be not just a few deaths, it would be a huge number of deaths.
It would be a huge number of deaths. Yes. And I saw on how can all those deaths be occurring in another one, what you'd expect to be a healthy population.
Population in the general is just thinking oh well, you know, have to say, yeah, the physical exam for a pilot and for a special operator are pretty similar.
The most stringent physical standards of anybody in the United States military has to be because of the stressors, because of the fact that they ride around, they're fly around at condition yellow to orange in their, in their heightened response because they're typically
flying at mock something or they're doing maneuvers that are not typical to just a lift and a bus in the air. We're talking about better combat.
What's to stop you and Teresa long for that matter writing to a chosen general and asking for the figures about.
Oh no nothing is nothing has stopped us that is all happened.
And we've got, we got nothing but have you pointed out the, the 40 at least 40 times that just came out this year.
That report came out a few months ago and she did directly walk in the general's office at the aviation school. So it's in the back of his head if you think about this.
When he's doing the safety stand down right now.
We can only pray that he puts the pieces together. Yes, but, but if you put all that together, Pete, there must be something wrong because it, you know, I'm pretty good with figures and it wouldn't be just like a 40% rise in the number of deaths.
You know, from crashes.
It's like a massive rise.
So it's massive to start with the two together. Yes, then it's it's even more than that because the hospitalizations are down. It just doesn't seem to be consistent. It's not the hospitalizations would be down.
And it's all those deaths.
It's, it's worthy of exactly what they're doing now with which is an investigation, but the investigation has to have a leg on it of doing the causation look, looking at maybe it's a chance for you to go because the helicopters, they're probably the most dangerous of the aircraft.
People don't understand because they, the damn things can't fly without those rotors. They've got no aerodynamic capability they can't kind of, they can't glide for example.
So you can't they can you can auto rotate and go if something's wrong with the pilot, the first aircraft you'd expect to be taken out would be the helicopters. Right.
That seems logical to me but, but it seems to me to be a chance for you and Teresa long to go in there and maybe others you know doctors Oh yeah if I didn't if I wasn't looking at 30,000 people coming across the border next week I would go there but you know for me that's
that's a tough call order but for her she's there at the at the schoolhouse. And yes helicopters basically beat the air into submission that's how they fly.
So yes, exactly. So, can you. So I have got three salons email address but I haven't really occasionally I email her.
She doesn't seem to see the emails I don't know what I'm writing to the wrong email address. No, I put me in touch with it that'd be great. Yeah, it'd be a lot easier I you know I know that she has different stressors put on her than me as I'm out and she's not so I but I will.
I will definitely reach out to her.
All right, so we've got Rose Rose Rose here.
And I want to show before go to Rose and then back to you, Steven. And Peter I want you to share the screen I shared this last week, or earlier this week. Here's the squawk 7700 monitoring, everybody.
I hope you've got access to this I can email this to you. I did I watched you last time you did it. Yes, I was there. All right, so everybody this is the May Day calls blue line is 2022.
Have a look at that extraordinary increase. So it reinforces Pete what you've just been saying and all of us are saying, Rose.
Yes sir. I love your 5g document that I use many many times and I know this is the same way but it actually goes hand in hand with the shot conversations. Can you review any additional information on the 5g and do you have additional reports
that I can reference as well.
I have additional reports on 5g. I have a lot of a lot of information not all of it's on my website that was just a repository for lines of effort but yeah, you know, I, there is a lot more on that but I would defer to Mark steel, as his information is, you know, he's the SME on that.
Looks like you have Mark steel to speak on 5g good. Very important because that that right there he, when I want to talk to somebody about 5g I go to him and he tells me, dude, does the EMF environment that's inside of a inside of your house if you have a router next to
your bed affect you yes, does it affect the pilot and the cockpit Yes, if there is some sort of damage if we are speculating that there could be something linked up between hydrogel graphene and binary lip and nanoparticles in a vaccine, which I cannot prove at this point, and that's, I'm not I'm not on that line of effort but I listened to the experts.
So if there is something on that if there are patents out there that relate to that, then we have to consider that as as not just 5g but just EMF in general, as a, as a, as a concern. The 5g if it's weaponized. Absolutely a concern, and that's where Mark steel has been really hot and heavy working on that recently.
So, Mark steel is is British and these from.
So, you're a go to expert for 5g. Yes.
Right. Well, I've asked because it was only yesterday that someone pointed to me to Marks dear never heard of him before.
So, um, yeah, okay. Very good. Thank you. So yeah, yeah, well, I talked to him because you cannot get a lot of information that's open source on the actual weaponization of 5g.
You can get plenty from the tele telecom tele, not telemarketing telecom companies, a lot of stuff on 5g but it's just going to be a drop in the bucket. If you want to understand the weaponization of it and that's the, that's where I go to for him I yeah I talked to other people I have people that text me every day on it.
So, maybe you don't know but do you know where he gets his information from or maybe you can't say.
Well, he was he was trained in it and he was worked he worked in that particular branch in the military.
Maybe in research but I don't know, I didn't ask him where he came from but which particular entity, but I know that he was trained by one of the best because I knew who that guy was.
And he referred to him as his instructor his mentor.
I see. Yeah.
Very good.
So, oh, hang on, maybe we're on as a quick. So anybody who's got any questions, I encourage you to dare to ask, because it may be you've got the crucial question that will lead to us all being freed from this nonsense.
So, I wanted to ask you, oh yeah, so very important to in order to prevent this happening again.
We have to hold the people responsible for what's happened in the last three years and before probably to account. And I just wondered, you're a military guy so you know all about strategy, how do we go about
holding these people to account when a lot of people on our side.
So, I think that's really important to us possibly on on some aspects, we, we don't really know what's gone on, we don't really understand the magnitude of what's gone on in the last three years.
So the site that you know the military grade psychological operation, the psychological torture which has got people into this state of Stockholm syndrome and I think it's much more common than we think on this call.
So, I think that's really important to us possibly on on some aspects, we don't really know what's gone on in the last three years.
After the Second World War but hopefully be better than those trials but they were a good start, arguably.
Having said that, of course we know that both sides were in the Second World War were being funded by the very people who are perpetrating these crimes on humanity of the moments.
How do you think we can best hold these people to account and obviously you may have views on how much you think we understand now what's happened.
Are we getting there or not.
And so I would say that, you know, I've seen okay, I'll use a story again because it's important to understand the mindset.
The very first time that I was a whistleblower with Teresa long is the lead whistleblower but I was one of the other four or three.
We spoke to Senator Johnson, and it was upon us whether we wanted to give our name to become a whistleblower. And he said if you don't do it, I can't use your information.
And there goes the moment of truth thing. And I was a, you know, special operations guy who had nothing on the internet about me not one stitch you couldn't find anything about me.
And that day, I'll, my name was on the C span or on some other news articles and, and therefore I wasn't living in the shadows anymore could not do that job anymore.
But I spoke with Senator Johnson the first time face to face in Dallas, Texas when he was down here doing an event. And I went in to see him and give them a brief and update on what was going on regarding the military.
And I gave him my email address and my email address has in it, the name Nuremberg. Yes, and you've seen it. So part of my email address. And he said that's a bit much to be sending to me could you send it to me to my official address with something
that's not depicting of Nuremberg because it's, you know, somebody foyers this they're going to see it's kind of out there right now. This was when we were whistleblowers, January 24 of 2022.
So there's further back.
And I said 15 months ago, 15 months ago. Yeah, I think that's when we were the whistleblowers, because yeah, it was 2022 January 16 months.
Yeah.
And I said, you'll get used to it, sir.
And he said, Okay, so then some fast forward now to several months ago and I don't remember what program he was on but he was talking about Nuremberg.
So, you see the switch. Sure. I've seen that. Yeah. Yeah. And then, Andrew Bridgen called me MP from the UK. Yeah, I know man. Okay, so you know I'm he's a great guy.
And he put us together and he wanted to talk about 5g and I explained you know my experience with it but he wanted to talk to Senator Johnson. I said well, I'll get him on the phone right now we could just talk.
But we're seeing more and more like that. I mean when I'm getting phone calls like that, you know some dude in Texas is you know, just a grunt. Essentially.
I might have done some important positions that I had to be responsible for but when those kind of connections are happening.
That's when I see the ability for people like me who have somewhat of a voice now to push to them at that level. Exactly.
Speaking. Yeah, when I'm speaking to Jim Jordan, who I've now talked to five times now, and say hey you're on the committee, looking at the weaponization of, of public health, okay he's got a committee specifically for that.
And I did a dissertation on that and I sent it to his office and I said, Here you go not dissertation a PowerPoint.
I did a research, very small compared to what a lot of POVA and Catherine what did, but it was my level, my way to understand it before their paper was out.
And now I have a person on his committee that talks to me, you know, not a not a legislator regularly. So the information goes direct to the top from the people like me from the information on the ground.
That's how we do it. Who's that Jim Jordan, Jim Jordan. Yeah, I am Ohio.
Yeah. Yeah.
So, I don't, and I'm not in contact with him. But I'd like to be.
Absolutely. He's a he's a he's a busy guy right now he's got the head of that committee but he uses somebody to talk to me because I can't talk to him every day but if something reaches his level, I get it directly to him.
That makes the ball move faster. This whole thing is the race and it's a race to the finish for humanity. Yeah. Yeah.
So, you're a key person in the United States to get information from this level to people who can really make a difference.
So, yeah, tonight, I'll email you, Pete, because I agree with you. It's all about.
So I got loads of contacts but it's not just having loads of contacts you do nothing with them. So we need to be put, I need to be. So I tried to do it. But I'm always thinking well I could do more you know but that limited number of hours in a day.
And I'm sure you know that problem. And, well, and understanding who your customer is so if my customers Jim Jordan versus Ron Johnson versus Mark Wayne Mullen, say, Senator from Oklahoma versus whatever exactly they understand their flavor, what do they want to hear.
Sure, Johnson says, I don't want anything more than 11 second television spot, and it's got to reach my level, Roger that. Hey sir I got an MP from Britain you want to talk to him. Absolutely. Okay, I'm not going to say hey sir I got a, you know, county commissioner down here in Texas wants
talk to you ain't gonna happen. You have to understand their, their comfort levels how busy they are, what they're doing. Sure. The soldier says hey I want to do a whistleblower. I'm not going to call him directly I'm going to call his staff.
But if he says, hey I found something huge, and he tells me, and this happened an FBI agent call me and said hey I want to be a whistleblower, and I found out this.
And I said, I'm going to call him directly on that. That's important. So I have to gauge that as to knowing where they're sure eyes in that strata of advice. So, so you have to not be calling wolf wolf all the time and it ends up in the busy guys.
Yeah, but, but, but of course, they need not to be busy to, to, at some moments to sort this out, because they can't be busy all the time. Yeah. So anybody that has those kind of connections important to do something exactly because if you just sit in and go I'm
I can go to the tea party with them. I could care less I don't want to hang around with exactly. I'm not interested about that because we're in a fight. We don't have time for tea we got to.
I agree with you. Yeah, and certainly not champagne. No, we're not celebrating yet. No, I don't mean that.
Two hands up we've got 10 minutes to go. Okay, let's get it done. Have you said that when we do meet people have some champagne together.
Yeah, I'm not a whiskey. How's that.
Yeah.
Prefer champagne I think but maybe you can convince me.
So we depends on what you give me just a wee bit.
Right.
All right, Daria.
Hi, I'm you.
Hi, Colonel chambers good to see you. Thank you again for being with us.
I don't know if you remember I'm a retired neurosurgeon and.
I do. Okay, thank you.
I, as I listened to you of course, 8 million questions come up with the first thing I wanted to ask you about from a flight surgeon standpoint is with all these mishaps and crashes and everything, where we don't have some kind of
distress call saying the pilot is incapacitated like we caught a few of those where that happened. But if all of the flight maintenance crew are jazzed, and they're malfunctioning.
And they're mentally glitching. And they're leaving things untightened and things like that. You'll have equipment failure crashes, and nobody will ever trace it back to the maintenance person that got jabbed.
That got jabbed. So the readiness issue is probably far far far more serious than even just the pilots, which is huge. Okay, that's why I've been on a plane since September 2019.
I'm driving everywhere I'm driving right now to Cincinnati I'm going to be meeting with Jay Bhattacharya and Scott Atlas at Hillsdale College event. Here's the invite.
So I got about 85 miles to go to get there. But that was my first point. The second thing was when you mentioned that the graphing and you may have, I don't know if anybody's been able to do this but clearly, people are identifying graphing and patents,
Karen Kingston I think said something about it. But is there a way, or if you, anybody you've spoken with, been able to determine if there's a way to measure or quantify not just qualify identification but actually quantify the presence of this, either with some kind of electromagnetic measurement of a person,
Teresa that's in our falls stuff sticks to magnetic.
So, it seems like there should be some type of testing, be it a blood test or an electromagnetic exam. I mean we could do EEG's we can do EKG's, you know, there's all kinds of different energy type tests that can be done.
It seems to me if there's a critical mass of graphing that's going to trick, combine with 5G to trigger some bad reaction in people, then there should be a way to see if the receiver, you know part of this which is a graphing and the person is present.
Yeah, I don't know. Yeah, no great great question so I'll answer quickly. First one is, yes, the ground crews, it has been identified when our tail rotor flew off of a Kiowa at Fort Rucker.
That was a maintenance issue straight up.
And two young men went into the ground Luckily, they survived.
And that happens and that's that's extremely. Dr. Long stepped in and I know she tried to get in there to get on the investigation she couldn't. However, she recommended a safety stand down at that time. That was seven, eight months ago.
So now we're finally getting the safety stand down, and it has to be across the board.
So, you know, we're looking at the next you know maintenance crews, all the way to pilots all the way to the towers you know we're looking at people in the towers. We work on stuff with the FA all the time and they're, they're sticking their hand, head in the sand.
The second question I don't have anything, any way to quantify that I know of. I know that they're working on it, I just don't, you know, I've stayed off that line of effort just because it's, it's not been in, in my wheelhouse but I have not heard I still pay attention.
I don't know if I've ever yet on the ability to quantify that but that you're right, it should be some way because it is is affected by EMF and you should be able to measure that. I agree.
Thanks. And then just the last was just an observation or an insight like one of my doctor obvious isms, that's been explained.
So, talking about the higher officers now ordering the stand downs and absorbing enough of this information it's like it's got too big for them to ignore.
It's almost as if in my mind, if you think of a brain like a computer, and it gets overloaded with so much malware that something's got a switch has got a flip where you just can't keep going and living in the lie.
And now, mental malware. So Stephen said psychological torture. It's also psychological bad downloads, and you reach a critical mass of, you know, for wants of a better term bullshit that you start even the most woke person is going to have to start
So I think we're getting to that point, but what's so heartbreaking and I think everybody agree with this is how many countless lives have been destroyed in the process, when we were all standing here screaming bloody murder back in 2020.
And, you know, with the false flag with the geriatric genocide, the whole nine yards the remdesivir and the days of lamb murders, you know, we saw this, and it's almost like you see the disaster in your case being a crash like it's going to happen, and there's nothing you can do to stop it.
And that's kind of where we are. So I hope we're reaching a critical mass of people that have had their fill of critical mass of bullshit, and finally, start paying attention. And also with these checking on the people that got jacked, make sure they're getting the proper testing and screening, not just your basic CBC and everything else that may come back normal, but also like the dimers and spike protein antibodies and things like that, like really go specific, because that's what they've been saying, oh, we can't find anything.
Well, you don't find what you don't look for. Now I'm going to mute my mic because I know we're running out of time but thank you and God bless you keep going.
Great to be careful.
Good to see.
Okay, bye bye.
Thanks. Thanks.
Hello, thank you very much for what you're doing.
I can't thank you enough. I'm here in Silicon Valley and I, the lockdowns were unbelievable. It's like a ghost town here. And we were all looking for our sheriff, so I'm really grateful for what you're doing.
I've been a doctor of acupuncture for 30 years, and I researched this quite a bit. I'm very concerned about the possibility of another, what I call scam them coming along the pipe with more fraudulent testing and more fear mongering.
I know you said you think about 10% of what they called coded was coded.
I just am hoping that we will look at the testing.
What, what was or was not actually isolated and get more clarity, so that we don't have another scam them it's happening.
I think the swine flu was a scam. And this is, this was a global scam. And I don't trust the science.
I wonder how you feel about. Yeah, so thank you very much for the question I you know, 10% of this what I believe was was the attack vector. So, the amount of effort put into this is about 10%.
And I think that for any of it, truly I have not seen anything isolated as a, as a coven, you know, Corona, Kobe to type of, you know, coronavirus has been around since when I was in medical school, it was the common cold, right, that was coronavirus.
So, it was a it was a target of choice I believe in this case so was the swine flu, or a lot of those things. So is Marburg so is monkey pox so is any of these things that are coming along which could possibly be the next thing.
False flags have gone out they didn't work. Supposedly a gas was released in New York City last year, when somebody ended up shooting up a train car and had a tank on his back and he was wearing a gas mask, and then, and then he shot everybody in the subway about 15 people.
Unfortunately they caught somebody in the front car caught it on video. And this was supposed to be a false flag.
The video shows them throwing blood bags down the ground and stepping on, just like in the movie.
So, we called it out, they backed off as I said yeah we caught this guy just let that one go so kind of goes back to the original question that we got in the last one was, what is it that.
How is it we're going to get this information out people wake them up. If they've been in charge of something and be standing there folding their arms going no we're just not going to change.
What's going to happen is eventually they're going to be embarrassed death and we've got to embarrass these people if they refuse to change and pivot off of this repent.
If they refuse to do that, we got to embarrass them because at this point now, there's more of us than there is of them. We've got to remove them from offices if we can.
And that's a whole nother story talking about election integrity but we've got to do that.
There was, I don't know if you know in 2007 there was a 100% false whooping cough PCR test scam that happened at the CDC newer. So,
I can get Stephen to get you the information. So this this PCR testing, locking us the whole world and scaring us thing it's got to stop they did this with HIV too.
I just, I don't know if you've ever read a farewell the virology by Dr. Mark Bailey. I don't have an argument about this. I'm just looking for that we don't have this happen again where a pandemic locks the whole world.
I encourage them that we just keep looking at how to stop false testing you said is 100% spot on. I mean, thank you. This is the fight. Absolutely. Thank you very much for being so great.
Thank you. Thank you. Just carry in rows and we're getting right up to the two and a half hour mark. So we will be quick. Thanks. Just a carry.
Hello, Dr. Chambers I'm originally Texan, but I'm in Florida.
I'm a family practitioner pediatrician, and I'm a friend of Monica Webby's we were in the same medical school class I mentioned you bet her, you were at a conference together.
My question is, I haven't.
How, how close are we to completing the wall, because I saw that Texas was going to actually keep going with a wall they found a way around the legal federal block that's not happening.
No, that's not. That's an optic is the reality is that they've made a chain link fence. It's about seven miles long right now, I can cut through it with my toenail clippers.
That's the truth.
I have a question, why in the world. I know Kevin McCarthy is not.
Anyway, why in the world is the house not defunding the who and you and such, because they have the budget, they have that power, and that would stop this, that's really the fastest only way to do it.
You're 100% that is the fight right there right now that is the fight because they control the budget, and they got to stop that funding, but also at the same time, and it could be an end around being done by Biden he could do an executive order and just sign
it anyway, it doesn't matter at this point, because everything seems to be executive orders that's their new tool if I don't like it. I'm either going to take my ball and go home or I'm going to change the rules of the game.
If they defund it he can still executive order and and override that you can't defund the who because we we we can't defund all their money there.
Most their second contributors the bill and Melinda Gates foundation.
Trump did it.
Yeah, he took us out of the who and then Biden put us back in. Yeah, and then he put him back in. Right. Right. Yeah, but the point is that he did it, he did take us out of the
Health Organization. It didn't stop it. It still happened.
Yeah, but that wasn't him.
So if he had he got reelected, then the who would still be without their funds from Trump, without a portion of it. Correct. Yeah, but
unless that the
Yeah, and if they vote for it, this is a great thing. You're right. Our legislators are weak. Most of them are weak. They're cowardless. They're cowards. They're feckless. They're weak. Most of them. There are some good ones, but just, you know, that's that's the fight.
So I think to Dr. Peter Bunkala, there is a new test coming out for justice by protein to see if it's still circulating.
Just throw that out. So we're going to have that ability, not just antibodies.
God bless you and God speed.
Very thank you. Awesome. Great to see you. Thanks, Gary. Talking about the feckless.
And then we'll finish up with last question.
What Carrie, sorry, sorry, Charles, I'm just thinking, what Carrie was saying there is very important because I also think this is just not this is not how you practice medicine.
And you know that when you think about it. So, but I think what Carrie was pointing to then is that exactly that this is not how you practice medicine. And yet if you look at the mainstream press, they seem to think in their ignorance that it is, and they seem to hold that view sincerely, even though they're completely wrong.
So I don't know, how do we reverse this nonsense?
That's a big question. We haven't got time for that, Rose.
This is really important. So it's not.
Are pandemics possible because I'm beginning to think that they're not possible at all, whether man-made viruses, so-called man-made viruses or natural viruses, the damn pandemics, which is the lifeblood of the World Health Organization,
can't occur because guess what? A deadly virus, in inverted commas, can't transmit because it kills its host. So a pandemic is always impossible.
And this has not been highlighted by, I think that's a great possibility.
Anyway, that's, Stephen, that's a five hour conversation and you're quite right. It has been raised. It's too big. We've got, you know, we're over time. Come on.
It hasn't been raised. It hasn't been raised sufficiently, in my opinion.
Good. Well, let's have a topic on it. Is it possible to have a pandemic? Great topic. Rose.
I have a quick one for Doc Chambers and Dr. Schoohler. I pray every day for basic discernment. And so that's my guide. I'm not a scientist.
My background was originally critical care nursing before I got into business analytics and consulting.
I stumbled upon answering the question, what is the commonality of the different regions that the spike proteins are affecting?
Because everybody's looking at it as the blind man touching the elephant. And I stumbled upon nitric oxide as a connective possibility.
Independently, I came across an obscure writing by a PA in Denver who was giving patients L-Arganine in the ER and then nitric oxide for the ARDS.
When I got on the phone with him, he says, are you aware of the Albert Einstein Institute and their double blind study in Italy giving patients L-Arganine?
And it reduced hospitalizations from 46 to 20 days. So they approached it from the L-Arganine and I was coming at it from the nitric oxide angle.
I'm not finding any scientist or can get to any scientist to really give this close scrutiny.
And I did send it off to the World Council for Health and they're reviewing it. But I think it's a huge aspect that nobody's looking at.
You know, I and it definitely is and it's definitely a conversation to be had.
I don't know that I could do any justice to it at this time, but I agree that we should look at all avenues. I'm just not on that line of effort.
I am so overwhelmed here in this think tank with dealing with, you know, the thing that's going to take down this country first.
Yeah, my question is, is who could I get that information to to run with it? Because three different people stumbled upon it independently.
Yeah, I don't know. I don't know who to get that to. I could speculate on it and just hit me up to my website and send me that and I'll continue with it because I don't know.
I couldn't answer that in this venue.
Yeah, maybe Dr. Long could run with it.
Yeah, she could.
Senator Stavem as well, Rose.
Yeah, could you do that, Rose?
Yeah, that would be great.
I'm sorry. Say that again, please.
Could you say, could you send this stuff to me that you were talking about?
Yes, shoot me out of your email so I know where to send it.
Oh, so it's Stephen with a PH.Frost as in Jack Frost at BTInternet.com. BTInternet.com.
Okay, great. Thanks.
We got it.
Thank you.
All right.
Time is up. Last question, Stephen, and we're going to go.
So last question, Pete, are you in touch with JJ Cooey?
No, not.
Right. You need to be in touch with him.
Okay.
Because he is a biologist. He's absolutely brilliant on the biology of what's happened.
And he agrees with me that these damn pandemics, either man-made viruses or not man-made viruses, natural,
it's not possible for them to create a deadly virus. It's not possible for a deadly virus to create a pandemic.
So we need to get this information out.
Yes, please. If you have a contact, link us up. That would be great.
And I think that JFK Jr. has been briefed on this, but I think it's entirely possible that even he doesn't understand the significance of it. I don't know. Maybe he does.
Yeah, I don't have the...
RFK Jr.
So sometimes, Pete, I think it... So do you agree it's not just a case of getting to these people, getting the information to the people.
You need to have a kind of following up conversation because it very often happens that you must have noticed this and I as well, that you come across information.
It's only three months later you understand the full significance of it.
Yes, about three months is right. Yes, absolutely. And yeah, I've run across that and I have to sell it in a different package to every different person.
Exactly.
You got to get that elevator speech down pat.
And JJ Cooey is absolutely brilliant at being honest with himself. So there's absolutely no point in, you know, getting the publicity and being sure about things when actually you're not sure.
I'll get it in front of every single one of them. RFK, Trump, it don't matter. I'll get it to them.
Very good.
Yeah.
All right. Okay, everybody. Thank you so much. Where's Pete? There he is. Daria, too late. We're going. That's it. Thank you for being here. Thank you, Pete. Round of applause for Pete. Thank you for your work. Keep up the fight.
White, by the way, is the hat.
It's just a light up top. It's a tan hat.
All right. Okay.
That's a palm leaf.
Very impressive.
All right. Thank you. Have a lovely evening, morning, day and see you at our next meeting. Thanks, Pete. Thanks, everybody.
Thank you, Charles. Thank you very much. Thank you, Peter.
Thanks, guys. Bye. Bye.
Bye, everybody.